Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

سلف غراف

@salafgraph

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,295subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179506231
TypeChannel
Username@salafgraph
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/salafgraph

Growth

2,2952,2982,296.58 August 2026 — 2,297 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,297 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,298 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,295 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,295–2,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:542,295-3
9 Aug 2026, 17:032,298+1
8 Aug 2026, 17:302,297no change
8 Aug 2026, 17:172,297first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 35s
Average length
3m 12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

896 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44349.4%
👍35539.6%
🔥293.24%
😢182.01%
💯121.34%
🤣91.00%
💔80.893%
👏60.67%
👌50.558%
😱50.558%
👎40.446%
20.223%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 896reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2025 to 12 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2025, 07:23 UTC≈5,000 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#الأحاديث_الصحيحة@salafgraph

29👍7

25 May 2025, 14:59 UTC≈6,050 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

غلط الرازي في تفسير المائدة وادعاءه أن رب عيسى المقصود بالطلب جبريل #مخالفات_الأشاعرة@salafgraph

👍3918

28 Apr 2025, 09:19 UTC≈6,290 views106 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

شخصيات منسية تستحق تسليط الضوء عليها.

👍5934💔8👏4💯1

31 Mar 2025, 19:02 UTC≈6,530 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

يريد الرفاعي بالكلام النفسي محض علم الله مما لا يدع مجالا للشك أن يقول القران الذي نزله به جبريل على محمد ليس كلام الله بل مخلوق من مخلوقاته ويريد بذلك نفي صفة الكلام عن الرب عز وجل موافقا المعتزلة في نفي صفات الكمال عن الله ومصرحا بالموافقة بلسانه وفي مسألة لفظ الحروف هناك تفصيل مفيد من ابن منده؛ بَابُ مَا يُعْرَفُ بِهِ الْكِتَابُ وَالرَّدُّ عَلَى مَنْ يَنْفِي الْحَرْفَ مِنْهُ عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ الْأَشْجَعِ

👍25🔥1742😱1

31 Mar 2025, 00:15 UTC≈4,410 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#خبر@salafgraph : كان الشافعي يقول: ما رأيت في أهل الأهواء قوما أشهد بالزور من الرافضة

42💯8

30 Mar 2025, 13:47 UTC≈4,290 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

كل عام وأنتم بخير

34👍8

28 Mar 2025, 14:12 UTC≈6,310 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

يدعي المحيسني أنه سمى معهده العز بن عبدالسلام تيمنا بكونه شخصية جهادية غير أن تبريراته تكشف أنه متملق فقط ويزعم أن الأمر إتباع لابن تيمية ولكن ابن تيمية ما قالها هكذا إنما قال: هم بمثابة أهل السنة في البلدان التي ليس فيها ذلك فهل تزعم أن سوريا ليس فيها أهل سنة أم ماذا؟ ثم لماذا العز تحديدا ويفترض باتباعك المزعوم لابن تيمية أن تعرف أنه قال عنه أنه ملحد ويرمي الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم بكتم الحق؟ فهل تريد أن تعلم طلابك

👍58🔥7

24 Mar 2025, 13:50 UTC≈3,860 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"وكُلَّما أحدث الناسُ ظلمًا وفجورًا؛ أحدث لهم ربهم -تبارك وتعالى- من الآفات والعلل في أغذيتهم وفواكههم، وأهويتهم ومياههم، وأبدانهم وخلقهم، وصُورهم، وأشكالهم وأخلاقهم من النقص والآفات، ما هو موجب أعمالهم، وظُلمهم، وفُجورهم". (زاد المعاد 4/332)

👍35😢63

23 Mar 2025, 10:52 UTC≈3,950 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: "سبحان الله .. في النفس: كِبرُ إبليس، وحسدُ قابيل، وعُتُوّ عاد، وطغيانُ ثمود، وجرأة النمرود، واستطالة فرعون، وبغي قارون، وقِحة هامان، وهوى بلعام، وحِيَلُ أصحاب السبت، وتمرّد الوليد، وجهلُ أبي جهل .. وفيها من أخلاق البهائم: حرصُ الغراب، وشرهُ الكلب، ورعونة الطاووس، ودناءة الجُعَل، وعقوق الضب، وحِقد الجمل، ووثوب الفهد، وصولةُ الأسد، وفسقُ الفأرة، وخبثُ الحيّة، وعبثُ القرد، وجمع النملة، ومكر ا

👍2919

17 Mar 2025, 08:48 UTC≈3,590 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

تعقبات وردود: جابر البغدادي - هل من يقرأ سورة الفتح يرى النبي في المنام؟

19👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @salafgraph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,115,583 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فقه النفس / مكاني
@makanyworld · 189,154
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سلف غراف” (@salafgraph), 2,295 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salafgraph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.