🧠 Sybil Resistance As AI-generated identity gets cheaper, proof-of-human becomes a harder and more valuable primitive. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots

Channel
Metamoonshots🚀
@metamoonshots
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
57,496subscribers
-2,680 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610445775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @metamoonshots |
| Description | Community for Web3 and AI. AMAs, News and Educational Contents. Enquiries @eddiemms @couponxdealer (Replying ASAP) https://twitter.com/metamoonshots Group - @moonshots Website - mms.cx |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/metamoonshots |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 57,496 | -498 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 57,994 | -325 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 58,319 | -238 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 58,557 | -276 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 58,833 | -750 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 59,583 | -450 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 60,033 | -143 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 60,176 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.6%
- avg views ÷ 57,496 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,670
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (14 March 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73,334 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,380
- Videos
- ≈93
- Links
- ≈1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
🧠 Decentralized Compute GPU marketplaces are crypto's answer to compute scarcity. Idle hardware anywhere can train models everywhere. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Agent Economies Multi-agent systems increasingly settle value on-chain. Smart contracts become the API between AIs. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Data Ownership Web3 reframes training data as an asset, not exhaust. Whoever owns the data pipeline owns the moat. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🚨 SCAM ALERT — PLEASE READ 🚨 We've been made aware of a fake channel @meta_moonshots impersonating our company to deceive our community and solicit money. We have little or no business operations via telegram. This is a scam. It is NOT run by us.
🧠 Verifiable Compute zkML lets you prove an AI model ran correctly without revealing the model or the data. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Autonomous Agents On-chain agents can now hold wallets and trade. The question shifts from "can AI trade" to "who audits it". — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Governance by Algorithm DAOs are quietly becoming AI agents' first real governance structure to operate inside. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Trading Bots The line between "AI trading bot" and "DeFi strategy" is mostly marketing at this point. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Tokenized Models Open-weight models are starting to carry on-chain provenance -- who fine-tuned what, and when. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Prediction Markets AI forecasts are only as good as their incentives. On-chain markets give predictions skin in the game. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
🧠 Sybil Resistance As AI-generated identity gets cheaper, proof-of-human becomes a harder and more valuable primitive. — 🚀 Moonshots Group: @moonshots · Channel: @metamoonshots
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @metamoonshots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 248,029 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pumpcoinbets · 1,039,723
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@CryptoTVOT_News · 200,395
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@immortal_airdrops · 620,635
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 157,837
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@Gemhunterrs · 618,145
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
@LowCarbonToken · 107,880
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@Crypto_FinderNews · 116,305
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 219,826
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoMoonShootNews1 · 154,536
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
@Crypto_InfinityNews · 125,718
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@Crypto_KingCall · 106,321
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@icospeaksnews · 310,868
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
@AirdropKartOfficial · 174,512
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
@airdropcomic · 319,251
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 200,959
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metamoonshots🚀” (@metamoonshots), 57,496 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metamoonshots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.