Keplr Suspends Google and Apple Logins Following Wallet Security Incident Keplr has temporarily disabled Google and Apple login options after users reported unauthorised transactions from wallets created through these methods. The issue has been linked to Web3Auth, a login infrastructure provider owned by Consensys, which has entered maintenance mode following a security incident. Keplr’s co-founder estimates that…

Channel
CryptoMiners | News
@cryptominers_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,467subscribers
-121 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001343081160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptominers_news |
| Description | Crypto Insights | AMAs | Spaces | News | Binance Affiliate DM @wolverine571 / @awkwerrd for collabs 🏠 @cryptominers_co 🐦 x.com/cryptominers_co & x.com/minersverse |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptominers_news |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:35 | 9,467 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:21 | 9,479 | -18 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 9,497 | -20 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 9,517 | -35 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 9,552 | -19 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 9,571 | -27 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 9,598 | -20 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 9,618 | -32 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 9,650 | -31 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 9,681 | -85 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:57 | 9,766 | -196 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 9,962 | -96 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 10,058 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 10,063 | -32 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 10,095 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 10,110 | -71 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 10,181 | -278 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 10,459 | +914 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 9,545 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 9,546 | first reading |
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.1%
- avg views ÷ 9,467 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,430
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 8.61%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 74 (27 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 38,618 |
| Reactions total | 3,247 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,010
- Videos
- ≈678
- Links
- ≈8,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 31s
- Average length
- 1m 46s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,808 reactions across 69 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 753 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 749 | 11.0% | |
| 🔥 | 729 | 10.7% | |
| 🤩 | 699 | 10.3% | |
| 🎉 | 675 | 9.91% | |
| 💯 | 631 | 9.27% | |
| ❤🔥 | 622 | 9.14% | |
| 😍 | 602 | 8.84% | |
| 🥰 | 579 | 8.50% | |
| 👎 | 197 | 2.89% | |
| 😢 | 195 | 2.86% | |
| 😱 | 165 | 2.42% | |
| 😁 | 77 | 1.13% | |
| 😈 | 25 | 0.367% | |
| 🥱 | 23 | 0.338% | |
| 😡 | 21 | 0.308% | |
| 🍌 | 18 | 0.264% | |
| 💔 | 18 | 0.264% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 0.235% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.059% | |
| 6 further kinds | 10 | 0.147% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,808 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
CNBC brought up FTX during its conversation with Binance Co-CEO Richard Teng, and I think his response was worth listening to. He made an important distinction between the two incidents. FTX was fraud, where customer funds simply weren’t there. Binance’s incident involved an external attack, and the company has committed to covering the full financial impact. Looking at the recovery, Binance has already set aside m…
🤩44❤38👍36😁32🎉26🔥25👀1🤯1
Binance and Deribit Revoke SignalPlus API Keys After Security Breach Binance and Deribit have revoked all customer API keys linked to SignalPlus following a cyberattack on the crypto trading platform. The attack reportedly began with a compromised Telegram account belonging to a third-party vendor. The attacker impersonated the contact and sent a fake Microsoft Teams invitation to a SignalPlus engineer, eventually …
Samsung Wallet Launches USDC Accounts on Solana for US Galaxy Users Samsung has rolled out its Stablecoin Account feature, allowing eligible U.S. Galaxy users to buy, hold, send and receive USDC on Solana directly through Samsung Wallet. Users can transfer USDC to external crypto wallets without Samsung transfer fees or send money to qualifying bank accounts in more than 60 countries, with recipients able to receiv…
❤1
Binance Reveals How Hackers Used Fake Job Interviews to Pull Off $6.34B Attack What started with a fake job interview eventually led to one of the biggest security incidents in crypto. Binance says hackers tricked an employee into downloading malicious code disguised as a coding assignment. They later used the compromised device and an internal AI tool to gain access to other engineers’ systems and reach the exchan…
👎16😱15😢14
Aztec Launches Tierra V6, Doubling Private Transaction Speed Ethereum Layer 2 @aztecnetwork has rolled out its Tierra V6 upgrade, fixing security vulnerabilities, including a critical V5 issue, and cutting private transaction proof generation time to around one second. The upgrade also reduces Ethereum-to-Aztec message times from around two minutes to as little as 12 seconds. Aztec is also preparing for more priva…
😢20😱19👎15❤1
CZ Calls for Crypto Security Alliance as AI-Driven Attacks Rise In his first interview since the October 29 Binance hack, CZ says AI is making cyberattacks faster and more sophisticated, and the crypto industry needs to step up its defences. He called for an industry-wide security alliance where companies can share threat intelligence, conduct security audits and coordinate faster to freeze stolen funds. CZ also s…
😁33❤27👍26🤩23🔥22🎉20👎19😢17
Binance Sees Deposits Outpace Withdrawals By 03:00 UTC, hourly deposits on @binance had started exceeding withdrawals, pointing to improving user activity and more stable flows.
😱20👎17😢15❤1🔥1
Binance Completes PoR Verification, Confirms 1:1 Backing for 10 Tokens Binance has completed the zero-knowledge proof for its October 31 Proof of Reserves snapshot, allowing users to independently verify that their balances in BTC, ETH, USDT, BNB, SOL, USDC, XRP, USD1, RLUSD and ZEC are backed at least 1:1. Users can check their balances through Binance’s PoR verification tool, with a guide available to walk them t…
👎21🎉18😱18👍17🤩17😢14❤12🔥11
Mercado Bitcoin Suspends Transactions After $40M+ Wallet Breach Mercado Bitcoin, Brazil’s largest crypto exchange, has suspended deposits, withdrawals and platform transactions after detecting unauthorised transfers from its hot wallets. More than $40M in suspicious transfers have been flagged across around 10 blockchains, with one on-chain analysis estimating the total at $48.5M. The exchange says the incident wa…
😢22👎17😱11❤1😁1
Trezor Warns Users After Suspected Hardware Implant in Safe 5 Trezor is urging customers who bought hardware wallets through reseller CryptoBilis since March 2026 to move their funds to a new wallet after receiving a report of a suspected hardware implant in a Safe 5 device. The alleged implant uses an extra circuit board with a cellular module that could capture recovery phrases displayed on the screen and transmi…
😢21👎15😱15🔥1
Binance Processes $4.65B in Withdrawals as Activity Stabilises Binance processed $4.649B in withdrawals and $1.01B in deposits between 06:00 and 15:30 UTC on November 1, resulting in a net outflow of approximately $3.64B. That’s around 2.1% of Binance’s $171B in total assets under management, based on its latest available Proof of Reserves data from October 28. After an initial spike, withdrawal volumes are now dec…
👎19😍17😱17😢16💯15❤14🔥14❤🔥12
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @cryptominers_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@dogepotann · 482 postsAnnouncement Stewie Inu
@AnnouncementStewieInu · 191 postOrgonX Official
@Orgonx2022 · 6911 postREALCHADLOUNGE
@REALCHADLOUNGE · 211 postROSlayersAnnouncement
@ROSlayersAnnouncement · 211 postAxle Games Annoucements
@axlegames · 3421 postBear Market Token Announcements
@bearmarketcoinAnnouncements · 11 postPepeDeFiAI Announcement
@pepedefiai_announcement · 4511 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ApexFintech · 1051 postBinance Research
@BinanceResearch · 10,2941 post₿itGo | Криптовалюта • NFT • Блокчейн
@bitgo · 1551 postBitMNR
@BitMNR · 2481 postBlockSec
@BlockSecTeam · 1,3881 postBNB Chain
@bnbchain · 71,7641 postBTCPay Server Official Community & Support 💚
@btcpayserver · 2,9311 postWAGMI: Chainlink Community
@chainlink · 3,8901 postCrypto news feed
@coindesk · 11,1931 postCrypto.fan base
@cryptocomJK · 3711 postGoPlus Security
@GoPlusSecurity · 8,5931 post𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚑𝙳𝚒𝚝
@HashDit · 971 postLido
@lidofinance · 8,4361 postmorpho 客服中心
@morpho · 111 postPessimistic
@pessimistic_io · 11 postsherlockdefi
@sherlockdefi · 31 postStarknet community
@starknet · 6601 postSui
@SuiNetwork · 2,2361 postTether
@tether · 49,4021 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 13
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 12
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptominers_news named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 23 August 2026 – 26 August 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 25 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 November 2026
named in 4 posts, 20 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 23 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 23 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 23 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 23 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 25 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 25 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptopandaann · 50,695
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@Crypto_Trust_CommunityAnn · 58,254
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@MetaBlockchainNews · 71,033
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
@DubaicryptowhalesNews · 46,599
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026
@cryptodetectorann · 24,263
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
@metamoonshots · 31,869
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@crypto_whale_global_annn · 41,546
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@Crypto_InfinityNews · 106,803
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@CryptoFi_news · 53,526
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 367,444
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
@Shitcoin_BSCCalls · 43,030
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
@CryptoWorldClub_News · 115,518
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@CryptoAvenueNews · 156,640
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
@Crypto_Planet_GlobalChannel · 54,053
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@cryptoastronautnews · 85,315
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
@whalesailors · 20,683
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@CryptoMoonShootNews1 · 179,538
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
@Gemhunterrs · 984,980
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
@CoinLabVerseNews · 122,607
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
@USACryptoGroupOfficial · 16,470
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
@kommunitas_ann · 22,527
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@CryptoPowerAnn · 40,119
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@Crypto_FinderNews · 125,919
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@CryptoTVOT_News · 240,044
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoMiners | News” (@cryptominers_news), 9,467 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptominers_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.