Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CPI Gems

@CPIGems

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,982subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001280876928
TypeChannel
Username@CPIGems
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CPIGems

Growth

1,9821,9831,982.56 August 2026 — 1,983 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,983 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,982–1,983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:221,982-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:401,983no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:451,983first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2440.7%
🔥1118.6%
🍌711.9%
🥱610.2%
😁58.47%
🤣35.08%
😭23.39%
😈11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2026, 07:45 UTC744 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Welcome everyone to the official 🐻

🥱6😭2

28 Dec 2025, 19:28 UTC≈1,080 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2025 was a year where every segment of crypto felt the pain 😭 • Alt season believers waited the whole year for a pump but ended up down more than 90% • Airdrop guys grinded every day but ended up with peanuts & unfair allocations • Memecoin holders waited for meme season but >90% of memes dumped to dust • NFT gang waited for NFT season but no ecosystem really boomed again 2025 was just fucked up for everyone, no

15

Signed Grover ⚡️ Community Strategy

14 Dec 2025, 12:57 UTC994 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

In 2011 this site used to give 5 $BTC for just solving a Captcha

13 Dec 2025, 16:43 UTC842 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥7

Signed Grover ⚡️ Community Strategy

28 Nov 2025, 15:17 UTC780 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/doomerfied/status/1994410935591833945?t=YQdN9NH-FKBlxdsXtDK9wQ&s=19

24 Nov 2025, 05:28 UTC610 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Most of the popular KOLs turned out to be Indian 😂 From dominating Fixing & Learning tutorials on YouTube to taking over the CT 💀 https://x.com/cryptoplayersin/status/1992827436577460569?t=sSPKl22CvP1dQL0ewJdnNw&s=19

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CPIGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 937,154 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ICO SPEAKS NEWS
@icospeaksnews · 314,250
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗦𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗫 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 221,595
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto TVOT Announcement
@CryptoTVOT_News · 190,783
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
CRYPTO MONSTER NEWS
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 158,516
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CPI Gems” (@CPIGems), 1,982 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CPIGems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.