Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sly Sports|Артем Слицкий

@slynestallone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,001subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001581274041
TypeChannel
Username@slynestallone
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/slynestallone

Growth

1,0011,0051,0037 August 2026 — 1,004 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,005 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,004 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,001 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,000–1,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:141,001-3
11 Aug 2026, 12:221,004-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:401,005+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:021,004first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.3%
avg views ÷ 1,001 subscribers
Avg views / post
313
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held17 (13 July 202625 July 2026)
Views total2,819
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6143.6%
3122.1%
🔥2316.4%
💯128.57%
75.00%
😁32.14%
👎10.714%
👏10.714%
😱10.714%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC218 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @megabodrVideo

Паша Яковлев тащит команду РБ прямиком в героический подвиг на международной арене

🔥63

24 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC221 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rbratingPhoto

Наши эксперты дали свои прогнозы на новый сезон РПЛ 🔮 Константин Генич и Александр Неценко уверены в чемпионстве «Зенита», а Андрей Бодров и Артем Слицкий считают, что золото возьмет «Спартак». Также есть расхождения и в прогнозах по лучшему бомбардиру и игроку чемпионата. Чей прогноз сбудется? 🤩 — Бодров 😎 — Генич 🤓 — Неценко ⚡️ — Слицкий 🤩 Скачивай приложение РБ

75

21 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC336 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В Москве растут цены на квартиры, а в Англии - на игроков АПЛ. Роджерс хорош (хотя и не раскрылся на ЧМ), но не за такие же деньжищи!

💯6😁1

20 Jul 2026, 22:27 UTC359 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Посмотрел Суперкубок. А накал-то — похлеще ЧМ!! А матчище-то поинтереснее финала! Спартак был лучше Зенита и заслужил победу. У питерцев ни одного момента. А пенальти… бедный Джику, наследие Станковича (от которого уже хочется избавиться) опять результативная ошибка, опять привезенный пенальти, опять рука (сколько их уже было?), на этот раз такая дурацкая. И ведь не за что пенять Карседо, это не Тухель, пихающий Бе

9👍1

19 Jul 2026, 22:48 UTC338 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всех переживавших за Фурию Роху — с победой! По делу.

👍13

19 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC328 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто?

  1. Испания 🇪🇸66%
  2. Аргентина 🇦🇷38%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍4

19 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC313 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍7

18 Jul 2026, 23:13 UTC342 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я бы назвал этот матч за «бронзу» цирком. Хотя что еще нужно американским болельщикам? Они любят шоу. Если оценивать с этой точки зрения, шоу удалось. Когда еще увидим такую россыпь голов? Ладно, войдет в историю! P.S: Мбаппе - лучший бомбардир? Ну не забьет же Лео 3 ЭТОЙ Испании?

🔥6👍3💯2

18 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC364 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интересный состав у «Спартака» на Суперкубок. В прошлом сезоне Карседо настойчиво играл против «Зенита» без центрфорвардов (хотя оба матча при нем были в Питере), и во втором случае даже успешно (победа в Кубке). Сейчас та же история. Верен идее. Хотя , вполне возможно, не уверен в текущей форме Угальде и Гарсии. Возвращается Бабич, его ждали. Тем более учитывая травму Джику в межсезонье. В своем канале «Спартак» р

👍71👎1🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC446 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По этому матчу точно нельзя сказать, что все пляшут вокруг Лео, сегодня скорее он работал на команду! Англия не должна была упускать инициативу, большую часть матча была лучше, но когда дала слабину, Аргентина включила тотальный футбол и заслужила победу. Хотя справедливее , возможно, была бы ничья. Но тоже , Англия, не щелкай клювом. Играй до конца. Честно, очень хотел ее видеть в финале. Теперь наверное за Аргент

👍9👏1

15 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC372 viewsread 7 August 2026

Англию жалко. Верим еще? Но эти аргентинские ребята взялись мертвой хваткой..

15 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC356 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мастера камбэков!! Очень круто, конечно! А главное — решают ребята из АПЛ) (Гордон тоже пока одной ногой )) )

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @slynestallone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

Кто?

  1. Испания 🇪🇸66%
  2. Аргентина 🇦🇷38%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 413,981 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sly Sports|Артем Слицкий” (@slynestallone), 1,001 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slynestallone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.