9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,954–30,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:25
29,960
-18
11 Aug 2026, 18:52
29,978
-5
10 Aug 2026, 15:16
29,983
-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:02
29,987
-2
8 Aug 2026, 15:08
29,989
-4
7 Aug 2026, 15:15
29,993
-5
6 Aug 2026, 15:03
29,998
-2
6 Aug 2026, 01:52
30,000
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:11
30,000
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.0%
avg views ÷ 29,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,580
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
21 (8 March 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
47,920
Reactions total
3,215
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
434
Videos
5
Links
884
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
19,150 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,856
46.2%
😢
3,261
17.0%
🤬
2,499
13.0%
🔥
1,545
8.07%
🤯
1,073
5.60%
👏
994
5.19%
😱
464
2.42%
👍
428
2.23%
🤔
30
0.157%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
82
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 21 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @megabitch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
28.6%
6 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
14,000
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
19,000
over 15 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Дело Линдси Клэнси и реальность материнства
TW: не читайте этот текст, если вы находитесь в уязвимом состоянии
В США идет суд над Линдси Клэнси, медсестрой, которая 23 января 2023 года убила троих своих маленьких детей и попыталась покончить с собой (ей это не удалось, с тех пор Линдси парализована ниже пояса). После рождения младшего ребенка Линдси переживала тяжелейший кризис ментального здоровья, принимала разны…
#реклама
Меня часто спрашивают, как я поддерживаю кукуху в стабильном состоянии, учитывая, что я работаю с тяжелыми темами. И я всегда отвечаю, что мне помогают тренировки. Я стабильно тренируюсь несколько раз в неделю, и эта часть моей рутины — обязательна. Потому, что я знаю, что сильное тело помогает мне справляться со всем, что жизнь в меня кидает.
Я стараюсь не давать советы, но если нужно, у меня для всех ест…
Jared Leto: Hollywood's dark secret
Рассказываю о документальном фильме BBC об обвинениях в адрес Джареда Лето
Сегодня вышел документальный фильм Jared Leto: Hollywood's dark secret об обвинениях актера и музыканта Джареда Лето в сексуализированном насилии. Большая часть девушек, которые рассказывают о своем опыте, были несовершеннолетними, когда взаимодействовали с Лето.
Год назад в издании Air Mail вышло расследо…
#реклама
Это сообщение для тех, кто думает о том, чтобы завести свой телеграм-канал, регулярно забрасывает свой телеграм-канал или испытывает другие муки, связанные с ведением блога. С 12 до 21 августа наши друзья из Papers проводят интенсив «Как начать вести телеграм-канал».
Это три онлайн-встречи по вечерам, во время которых вы разберетесь с темой и аудиторией вашего блога, придумаете, о чем и как писать и разбер…
Феминизм — это женщины против мужчин или борьба женщин и мужчин за равноправие?
Мне задали такой вопрос в инстаграме, и я хочу на него ответить развернуто. С дисклеймером, что я не гендерная исследовательница (могу ошибаться), я журналистка, и я занимаюсь темой прав женщин много лет. Феминизм — это не то и не другое, феминизм — это борьба за права женщин.
Есть специфически женские права, за соблюдение которых борют…
Они среди нас
tw: сексуализированное насилие
В Великобритании очередное громкое дело о многолетнем насилии над женщиной. 13 мужчин обвиняются в сексуализированном насилии в адрес женщины (ее имя не называют, чтобы защитить ее частную жизнь) с применением наркотических средств. Это дело похоже на кейс Жизель Пелико: полиция утверждает, что мужчина 60 лет из Стокпорта годами накачивал жену наркотиками до беспамятства…
tw: сексуализированное насилие
«Когда Рут О'Грейди по настоянию своего мужа зарегистрировалась на сайте для свингеров, она сказала ему, что никогда не будет заниматься сексом в машине с незнакомым человеком. Через несколько месяцев она начала делать именно это — и отправлять мужу видеозаписи этих встреч».
Так начинается новое расследование британского BBC Global Women — о женщинах, которых мужья вынуждают заниматьс…
Штраф за сексизм: парагвайский теннисист оштрафован за дискриминационные высказывания после матча на Ролан Гаррос
Неделю назад 22-летний Адольфо Даниэль Вальехо, теннисист из Парагвая, проиграл матч французу Моизу Куаме на турнире Ролан-Гаррос. Судьей была бразильянка Ана Карвальо.
В тот же день Вальехо дал комментарий изданию Clay, в котором сказал: «Такие матчи должны судить мужчины, для женщин это слишком сложно…
Неловко наблюдать за происходящим вокруг тура Оксимирона. Год и два месяца назад мы выпустили расследование «Творческий метод», героини которого обвиняли музыканта Мирона Федорова в груминге и сексуализированном насилии. Я совершила много попыток взять у Мирона комментарии, но он больше года молчал, потом выпустил новую музыку и отправился в тур. А теперь организаторы тура в ответ на возмущение людей тем, что европей…
Tw: насилие над женщинами и детьми
Недавно я наткнулась на ветку в Threads, к которой возвращаюсь только когда чувствую в себе силы.
Эта ветка появилась 16 апреля. Ее начала женщина, которая написала:
«Женщины, время настало. Последние 44 года я думала, что молчание меня защищает. На самом деле оно защищало насильника. Его зовут Рэнди МакЛеод. Мне было 12. Ему было 22».
Ветка набрала больше тысячи реплаев. Америк…
#реклама
Где вы читаете важные материалы о женщинах и о том, что их волнует? Я уже давно подписана на «Гласную» — независимое феминистское издание, которое не только рассказывает о значимых для женщинах новостях, но и делает по-настоящему уникальные материалы, в том числе о российских регионах. Например, материал о молодых жительницах Чувашии, которые делают народное современным и популярным, или рассказ женщины-саа…
#реклама
Что такое «здоровая психика»? (Поднимите руки все, кто сейчас подумала: а мне-то откуда знать?) Очень понравилось определение из психоанализа: здоровая психика описывается через способность любить (строить долгосрочные отношения и привязанность), работать (иметь значимое дело и получать от него удовлетворение) и играть (творить и ввязываться в приключения).
Если описывать ее так, здоровая психика уже не ка…
❤121👍15👏10🔥3🤬2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @megabitch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 70,939 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“дочь разбойника” (@megabitch), 29,960 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megabitch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
