Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Территория Зап

@zap4you

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,166subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001180279311
TypeChannel
Username@zap4you
Created5 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zap4you

Growth

3,1663,1713,168.56 August 2026 — 3,171 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,169 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,166 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,165–3,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:283,166-3
9 Aug 2026, 17:013,169-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:013,171no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:553,171first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 3,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
865
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held19 (30 March 202624 July 2026)
Views total2,596
Reactions total139
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 09s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,144 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42437.1%
🤬1039.00%
😱988.57%
💔958.30%
🔥958.30%
❤‍🔥877.60%
🤯796.91%
😢524.55%
👏302.62%
😁232.01%
🕊191.66%
👎161.40%
👍121.05%
🤔70.612%
🥰40.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC605 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @megabitch

Феминизм — это женщины против мужчин или борьба женщин и мужчин за равноправие? Мне задали такой вопрос в инстаграме, и я хочу на него ответить развернуто. С дисклеймером, что я не гендерная исследовательница (могу ошибаться), я журналистка, и я занимаюсь темой прав женщин много лет. Феминизм — это не то и не другое, феминизм — это борьба за права женщин. Есть специфически женские права, за соблюдение которых борют

51👏15❤‍🔥5💔2

22 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC791 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @deptonePhoto

⚡️ Закон о фактическом «лишении гражданства»: как подготовиться? Разговор с правозащитниками Уже завтра Госдума может принять закон, который станет одним из самых жестких механизмов преследования российской политической эмиграции. Когда он вступит в силу, фигурантов любых уголовных и политических административных дел, без преувеличения, смогут «лишать гражданства». Согласно актуальному тексту законопроекта, они не с

😱74

14 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,200 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы не хотите идти на встречу с терапевткой. Если у вас выпадают неотложные дела на это время. Если вы внезапно заболеваете — и не один раз. Если не можете дождаться конца встречи. И с облегчением вздыхаете, когда она закончилась. Это всё повод обсудить с терапевткой то, что с вами происходит. Чаще всего следует качественный прорыв в терапии. А иногда она заканчивается или встаёт на паузу. Ваши чувства, какие б

55

22 Jun 2026, 19:22 UTC≈1,720 views126 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1500+ часов практики как гештальт-терапевтка. Горжусь собой. ☺️

63🔥56👍6👎1

16 Jun 2026, 10:01 UTC≈2,140 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @truefeminist

​​Про «свободный» выбор женщин Вот я почитываю «Тёрнз» и вижу, что в целом русскоязычное общество становится более прогрессивным, от феминизма не то что не падают в обморок — некоторые вещи, о которых единичные «фемки» спорили до хрипоты еще 10 лет назад, стали очевидной нормой, и их даже обсуждать неприлично стало. Появился оскорбительный и мизогинненький термин «пикми», которым обозначают женщин и поведение, еще в

💔3627

13 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,830 views138 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я психолог. И у меня был психолог с которым я ушла в дичайший перенос. (Давно) Она с ним не работала, она его использовала. Я слилась когда всерьез задумалась купить ей дом. Это не шутка. Я оплачивала ей продукты, привозила роллы, сопровождала в командировках. На все это она говорила, что за терапию которую она мне проводит я должна БОЛЬШЕ. НУ и неплохо было бы домик… Пруфы есть, в комитет по этике обращалась, мне с

😱78🤯48🤔7😢32

10 Jun 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,960 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Видео о том, как в Китае уничтожают девочек. Люблю её видео о Китае, режет как бритвой правду-матку.

😱135🤬2

3 Jun 2026, 07:54 UTC≈2,040 views90 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ледяная гора. Терапевтка: Скажи, насколько она большая? Я: Очень большая. Я вижу нас со стороны, мы нарисованы, как в мультике. Ты чуть больше, я поменьше. Мы стоим рядом с ней и я показываю её тебе. Я боюсь, что у тебя заболит шея, пока ты пытаешься увидеть её вершину. Т.: Как тебе быть тут? Я: Мне холодно. Очень холодно. И стыдно. Я так долго с ней, она такая огромная и у меня никак не получается от неё избавиться

60❤‍🔥26🔥2🕊1😁1

3 Jun 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,530 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

20😁2

26 May 2026, 09:58 UTC≈2,050 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tvrainVideo

Гомосексуальность и трансгендерность назвали психическими заболеваниями на съезде психиатров России Главврач лечебно-реабилитационного научного центра «Феникс» (негосударственное учреждение) в ходе XVIII съезда психиатров России Ольга Бухановская рассказала о «расстройстве трансгендерного спектра», обратила внимание «Верстка». Среди этих расстройств Бухановская перечислила пять «заболеваний»: гомосексуальность, «тр

🤬26😢22🤯12👎52🔥2😁1

17 May 2026, 18:34 UTC≈2,120 views112 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Больше месяца без постов — ну это что за безобразие? Мне вчера сказали, что на западе новый тренд: не постить вообще ничего в соцсети. Типа активность а соцсетях — это для смердов. А я не пощщу не поэтому, конечно. Просто так вкусно жить стало! Тепло наконец-то. Друзья тут завелись. Работа любимая. Дочь сладкая. Скоро пополнение в семье. Вкусно, уютно, безопасно. Хочется вот этим всем заниматься и не заставлять себ

71❤‍🔥27🕊9👏4🥰1

9 May 2026, 08:48 UTC≈2,480 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

С днём скорби о потерянном мире.

💔45😢24👎8🕊7👏1🤬1🤯1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zap4you. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Территория Зап” (@zap4you), 3,166 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zap4you.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.