CINEMA IS PUNK❗️
Официальный канал продакшна «Место силы»
Номер заявления РКН: № 6620396718
https://mc2production.ru
Для связи: @mc2_production
Бот «Чёрный ящик mc2»: @black_box_mc2_bot
18+
Created
6 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,027–10,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:15
10,037
-7
11 Aug 2026, 16:31
10,044
-13
10 Aug 2026, 19:18
10,057
-9
9 Aug 2026, 17:42
10,066
-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:35
10,072
-10
7 Aug 2026, 15:07
10,082
-13
6 Aug 2026, 16:40
10,095
-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:48
10,102
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:19
10,102
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 10,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,200
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
17 (20 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
71,418
Reactions total
848
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,310
Videos
≈252
Links
≈574
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
690 reactions across 14 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
213
30.9%
🔥
113
16.4%
❤🔥
94
13.6%
😁
64
9.28%
🙏
43
6.23%
🤩
24
3.48%
😭
19
2.75%
👍
18
2.61%
💯
17
2.46%
💩
14
2.03%
⚡
12
1.74%
🥰
12
1.74%
🕊
11
1.59%
🤝
8
1.16%
💘
4
0.58%
🤨
4
0.58%
🤮
4
0.58%
👎
3
0.435%
😢
3
0.435%
🦄
3
0.435%
5 further kinds
7
1.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 848reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 17 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mc2_prod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Постер «ДЫШИ» кинокритики и киноблогеры назвали одним из лучших среди российских фильмов и сериалов 2020-х🔥
Также коллеги отметили постер «КОНЧИТСЯ ЛЕТО».
Эта новость нас, конечно, порадовала, а заодно заставила задуматься, какие постеры назвали бы мы. Выбрать оказалось непросто, поэтому выносим вопрос на обсуждение в комментариях: какой лучший и худший постер запомнился вам?
Российский рынок коллеги уже обсудили,…
17 августа в киноклубе музея AZ «Образ жизни» пройдёт показ нашего фильма «КОНЧИТСЯ ЛЕТО»🎞️
После просмотра состоится обсуждение с кинокритиком Ларисой Малюковой о том, как жить среди тех, кто не принимает тебя и считает чужим; можно ли сбежать от самого себя и начать новую жизнь, если прошлое не отстает, и кто же герои картины на самом деле — преступники или жертвы обстоятельств.
Билеты и подробности — на сайте му…
Всем привет! На связи Женя Лесниченко, VFX-супервайзер «Волшебного участка».
Сегодня хочу рассказать про забавную пасхалку из нашего сериала, которую мы придумали, чтобы повеселить команду.
Помните сцену из третьей серии первого сезона? Михалыч спрашивает Лёху, что подсказывает ему расследовательская чуйка, что он чувствует. Лёха отвечает: «Духи какие-то бабские». Михалыч обижается и уточняет, что это аромат «Одер …
Я некомпетентна вообще во всем.
Всем привет, это Янина Костицына, и давайте потрындим за опыт сценариста. Часто преподаватели, киноделы и другие сценаристы говорят «пиши о себе». Никто не объясняет, что это значит, но все с умным видом кивают, мол да-да, вы правы…
А потом, когда человек садится что-то писать… он задается вопросом «а что именно писать»? Объективно говоря: наша жизнь скучна. Не писать же автобиографи…
Если бы вам нужно было показать инопланетянину три фильма или сериала, чтобы помочь ему понять человечество, — что бы вы выбрали?
Part 2
«Человек с киноаппаратом» (1929), реж. Дзига Вертов
Квинтэссенция кино. Город, человек и камера как единый живой организм. Посыл для инопланетян: человек умеет мыслить образами, соединяя разрозненные фрагменты реальности в новые смыслы. «Человек с киноаппаратом» показывает, что к…
Привет.
Это Место силы.
Что значит быть человеком? Этим вопросом задаются веками. А что, если ответ давно есть — просто он не в учебниках, а в кино?
В этот раз в нашей рубрике «5 мнений» представители киноиндустрии рассуждают, какие фильмы/сериалы, они бы показали инопланетянину, чтобы помочь ему понять человечество.
А какой ваш внеземной плейлист? Делитесь в комментариях🛸
Part 1
Решил не портить первое впечатле…
Привет.
Это Место силы.
Сегодня мы здесь, чтобы рассказать о талантливых ребятах, которым нужна помощь.
У наших друзей из мастерской «Кречет» случилось большое несчастье. Пожар практически полностью уничтожил их мастерскую, а вместе с ней проекты, технику, оборудование, костюмы… Даже лежанку кошки.
Мы не понаслышке знаем, сколько труда, таланта и души было вложено в это место. Именно ребята из «Кречета» создавали р…
Ребят, ищу актера такого плана. Высокий, большой азиат, или может даже нет. Вдруг у кого-то есть знакомый? (Не обязательно актер)
❤8🤩7⚡4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mc2_prod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 32,392 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mc2 - Место силы” (@mc2_prod), 10,037 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mc2_prod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.