Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кино_Ёж

Channel

Кино_Ёж

@Film_hedgehog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,312subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185042770
TypeChannel
Username@Film_hedgehog
Created25 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Film_hedgehog

Growth

10,31210,34410,3286 August 2026 — 10,341 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,341 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,343 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,344 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,338 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,332 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,330 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,325 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,318 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,315 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,312 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,307–10,349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 15:3610,312-3
15 Aug 2026, 00:1710,315-3
13 Aug 2026, 17:4810,318-7
12 Aug 2026, 18:4810,325-5
11 Aug 2026, 20:2510,330-2
10 Aug 2026, 20:3310,332-6
9 Aug 2026, 20:2110,338-4
8 Aug 2026, 23:1010,342-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:4210,344+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:3510,343+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:4810,341no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:5510,341first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 10,312 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,230
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held26 (25 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total58,016
Reactions total860
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

860 reactions across 26 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁31636.7%
31536.6%
👍12314.3%
🔥839.65%
🤯101.16%
👎80.93%
😢50.581%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 860reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC816 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @vodott

🥂Софья Митрофанова на своем примере доказала, что жизнь за МКАДом за пределами нашего большого медиапузыря все-таки существует! Из группы МТС она переходит в статус ученой дамы и теперь занимает должность исполняющего обязанности ректора Московского государственного института культуры. Поздравляем Софью с действительно неожиданным назначением. Желаем, чтобы приставка и.о вскоре была отброшена за ненадобностью. @s_tr

🔥5😁5👍2

14 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,260 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Мысль, которая стоит отдельного поста: самое опасное для проектов и партнерства — когда люди, не понимают, чего хотят. Эта штука, опаснее,чем заблуждения или ошибки. Если люди не знают, чего хотят, на самом деле — не ходите с ними. Вообще никуда

👍33🔥1410

13 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,280 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026

История про моего киноёжкиного кота Опасная профессия Влюбился мой кот в интересную и противоречивую девушку. Правда, этот факт не имеет прямого отношения к истории. История началась с того, что кот решил снять квартиру для совместного проживания и нашел, ну самый подходящий вариант — по местоположению хаты, по цене, по количеству комнат (у девушки был очень хитрый скарб, для которого требовалась отдельная пустая к

😁408

12 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC≈1,370 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @grom_filmPhoto

😏 Стая, мы с крутыми новостями! Фильм «Майор Гром: Игра» забрал три награды на престижном фестивале боевиков Джеки Чана «Jackie Chan International Action Film Week»: «Лучший монтаж», «Лучший сценарий» и «Лучший боевик»! Ваши поздравления ждём в комментариях 🎊

36👍17👎4

11 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,610 views60 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Съемки иногда бывают не просто в регионах, а в очень лохматых местах — там, где и гостиниц-то толком нет. А людей расселять надо. Самое нестандартное на моей памяти произошло, когда снимали под Сыктывкаром и надо было найти место для ночевки съемочной группе. Заранее вроде все решили, но что-то пошло не по плану (как всегда) и осталось 5 человек светиков (осветителей), которым негде было ночевать. Продюсерша Оля на

😁58🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈2,020 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Мужики, а давайте реально проголосуем. Никто ж не знает, кто как проголосовал, зато поймем реальную картину. Вопрос для мужчин: боитесь ли вы свою женщину? (Не в ее гневе, а просто)

  1. Боюсь4%
  2. Не боюсь29%
  3. Сложно сказать… не знаю6%
  4. Я женщина и хочу посмотреть результат62%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁179

9 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,000 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Боюс-боюс Возник тут, дискурс с одной девушкой. Говорит, что крепкие отношения, это когда мужчина боится женщину. Если не боится, то не получится нормальных отношений. В пример привела, несколько, знакомых обоим нам, пар. Во-первых, мне кажется, что в тех примерах, парни не боятся своих дам. А во-вторых, я считаю, что страх — это фиговая штука. Да, мужчины испытывают страх, если его женщина в гневе. В таком, зна

😁13👍86

8 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC≈2,070 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Увидел док. сериал про попсу 90-х. Залип и посмотрел, все, что пока выложено (две серии). Че-то я никогда не смотрел такое на платформе «Смотрим». Обычно, подобное выпускают онлайн-кинотеатры и не в открытом доступе. А тут, небольшие серии и бодро собранные. Ни разу не реклама. Все, от души

17

5 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈2,750 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Я, нифига, не разбираюсь в американских юридических кино-вопросах, но с помощью коллег разобрался, че к чему, в нашумевшем кейсе. Рассказываю, для тех, кто как не понял основную схему. Ворнер Бразерз сняло фильм «Койот против Акме» — про мультяшного персонажа, живущего в реальном мире. Старички могут помнить подобный мувик «Космический джем» (1996) с Майклом Джорданом. Кино сняли, а потом кинокомпания приняла реше

16👍6🤯2

4 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈3,030 views70 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Мечтатели Есть у меня ребята, которых я периодически консультирую. Кстати, платно. И вот, мы каждый раз садимся обсуждать, каждый раз они декларируют, что в этот раз, они хотят и есть бюджет, сделать что-то новое, свежее, нетепичное. Мы разгоняемся, работаем, находим свежие и смелые решения, прорабатываем. А потом… А потом, они делают все тоже самое, что делали всегда: что умеют, что «верняк». Каждый раз в этой сх

😁4813🔥7👍1👎1

2 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,630 views118 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Недавняя история про неожиданный выход Пристала ко мне одна девушка. Не то, что бы я против, когда девушки заинтересовываются мной, но тут, дело было другое и рабочее. Она активно хотела найти работы от меня. А я не хотел. Сначала на премьере атаковала, потом я вышел на Новый Арбат и решил прогуляться. Моргнуть не успел, как девушка оказалась тут же и ей, по счастливому стечению обстоятельств, нужно было идти в ту

😁6632👍17🔥2😢1

31 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC≈2,070 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Все, как у нас… но тока у нас никто не судится

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Film_hedgehog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Film_hedgehog edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTCAnonymous Poll595 voters

Мужики, а давайте реально проголосуем. Никто ж не знает, кто как проголосовал, зато поймем реальную картину. Вопрос для мужчин: боитесь ли вы свою женщину? (Не в ее гневе, а просто)

  1. Боюсь4%
  2. Не боюсь29%
  3. Сложно сказать… не знаю6%
  4. Я женщина и хочу посмотреть результат62%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 162,894 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Okko Кино
@okkomovies · 119,487
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 124,286
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Друзья Дональда
@steven_bb · 631,713
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кино_Ёж” (@Film_hedgehog), 10,312 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Film_hedgehog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.