Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Токатлы печатает...

@d3bu99er

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661967624
TypeChannel
Username@d3bu99er
DescriptionМой личный блог, где я делюсь своими мыслями и наблюдениями.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/d3bu99er

Growth

327 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:0132no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:2132first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.0%
avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held19 (25 February 202630 July 2026)
Views total24
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
100
Videos
33
Links
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20m 45s
Average length
20m 45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 6325704326916343259422.2%
👍422.2%
custom 6325524440801084490316.7%
custom 5424972470023104089211.1%
custom 6325700173682968363211.1%
custom 632757892981719265215.56%
custom 632771647184987871715.56%
👎15.56%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @durov_russiaPhoto

😈

👎1custom 63255244408010844901custom 63275789298171926521

26 Jun 2026, 16:55 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ничего особенного, просто сотрудники Valve играют в CS2 на суперъяхте Гейба стоимостью $500 млн. Так должен выглядеть корпоратив в каждой компании

custom 54249724700231040891

21 Jun 2026, 19:28 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/sU-Qh9MhaZQ

custom 54249724700231040891custom 63257043269163432591custom 63277164718498787171

21 May 2026, 15:47 UTC95 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhovner_hubPhoto

Flipper One — нам нужна ваша помощь Мы наконец готовы рассказать про Flipper One — проект, над которым корпим уже много лет и который несколько раз полностью переделывали с нуля. Это очень сложный проект как экономически, так и технически. Поэтому сегодня мы выходим в паблик не с триумфальным анонсом, а чтобы рассказать все как есть. Скажем честно — нам тупо страшно и нам нужна ваша помощь. https://habr.com/ru/co

16 May 2026, 18:27 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 63257043269163432592

10 Apr 2026, 21:10 UTC95 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @pentestnotesPhoto

Наткнулся на, пожалуй, самый объемный гайд по безопасности JWT в рунете. Автор канала Пингискок ультанул и выпустил цикл из 20 статей на ~25000 слов (это очень много буков)! Где разобрал JWT буквально побайтово🤩 Список статей: 1. Почему JWT сломан by design 2. Анатомия токена 3. alg:none - одна строчка и ты admin 4. Algorithm Confusion - публичный ключ как пароль 5. kid injection - SQLi через заголовок токена 6. j

👍1custom 63257043269163432591

10 Apr 2026, 12:41 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

😁😆😁 спасибо за кошерные новости! Лайк!

custom 63255244408010844901

8 Apr 2026, 18:04 UTC79 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @cepterPhoto

Необычные чувства возникают при написании этих строк, но итог закономерен. 20 лет для инди-проекта — это немало. Он начинался как эксперимент для самообразования, но превратился в нечто большее. Работа над цептером изменила не только меня, но и людей вокруг. Я рад, что смог вдохновить многих начать свой путь в IT индустрии. На протяжении этих лет с проектом были связаны различные истории. Одно оставалось неизменным -

custom 63257001736829683632

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @d3bu99er. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Токатлы печатает...” (@d3bu99er), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d3bu99er.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.