Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for newmeta

Channel

newmeta

@newmeta_market

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001324003737
TypeChannel
Username@newmeta_market
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/newmeta_market

Growth

251252251.57 August 2026 — 252 subscribers8 August 2026 — 252 subscribers15 August 2026 — 251 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 251–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:56251-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:20252no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:52252first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5420315771991497307233.3%
233.3%
custom 5327997103526389902116.7%
custom 5424998158222518433116.7%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 5 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Dec 2025, 19:30 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026

UFC Mystery Box Models (45) • Emoji • Stickers 🥊 Bones — 0.5% 🥊 Borz — 0.5% 🥊 Do Bronxs — 0.5% 🥊 El Matador — 0.5% 🥊 Last Stylebender — 0.5% 🥊 Poatan — 0.5% 🥊 Sugar — 0.5% 🥊 The Cannibal — 0.5% 🥊 The Great — 0.5% 🥊 The Machine — 0.5% 🥊 UFC World — 0.5% 🥊 Ult Fighting — 0.5% 🥊 Golden Fists — 1% 🥊 Golden Octagon — 1% 🥊 UFC Classic — 1% 🥊 Ultimate Ult — 1% 🥊 Display Case — 1.5% 🥊 Glove Story — 1.5% 🥊 Key Ring — 1.5% 🥊

22 Oct 2025, 07:30 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DefiscamcheckPhoto

А робот может сочинить симфонию? (с) Вспоминается мем с Виллом Смитом, где главный герой дискутировал, что может делать андроид, а что нет Неутешительные промежуточные результаты торговых соревнований LLM моделей: Пока на флетовом от начала соревнования рынке (btc стоил тогда те же $108K) - ChatGPT смог спустить 65% (-$6.5k от $10к) стартового капитала - Deepseek дважды раундтрипнул +50% от депозита и держится в

22 Oct 2025, 07:30 UTC32 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @icodrops_sergeyPhoto

AI модели соревнуются онлайн в Фьюче-торговле Интересно понаблюдать - https://nof1.ai/

12 Oct 2025, 12:28 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @makecryptogreat

Криптокрах 11 октября – что на самом деле произошло Около $60–90m USDe были слиты на Binance вместе с wBETH и BNSOL, чтобы воспользоваться уязвимостью в системе ценообразования, где залог оценивался по данным ордербука Binance, а не по внешним оракулам. Это локальное отклонение цены запустило принудительные ликвидации на $500m–$1b, вызвало каскад на $19b+ по всему рынку и принесло атакующим около 192m прибыли благо

11 Oct 2025, 23:45 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @darvin_crypto_notes

Вот ребята детально расписали касаемо вчерашней ситуации (текст не мой): И так, что произошло вчера и почему Бинанс пидорасы Мы сразу опустим момент с Трампом и тарифами, это понятное влияние на все рынки. Но не он был причиной того, что многие люди проснулись без депозитов. 1. Винтермьют, как ручной маркетмейкер Бинанса, который уже был замечен за рагпулами, за пару часов перечисляет 700 мультов на биржу (около 2

11 Oct 2025, 23:11 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Nat_Selection

после таких сильных падений, на рынке как будто бы все токены перестают представлять ценность, становятся никому не нужны, музыка не играет, все трезвые, тихо как на кладбище ночью теперь нужно чтобы что-то смогло вдохнуть вторую жизнь в рынок, добавить оптимизма, снова выкрутить громкость.. сколько на это потребуется времени?

11 Oct 2025, 12:22 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @racealiensPhoto

Многие сейчас пишут, что «проспали возможность» 🎾Испытывают фомо, что не купили тон по 0.5$ Хочу вас заверить, что в 90% случаях вы бы и не купили сужу по себе: я был уверен, что за окном уже ядерка, а я просто ещё этого не знаю; меня тупо трясло Я прям в моменте думал, что сейчас куплю тон по 0.5$, а через 10 минут он будет 0.005$🧔‍♂️ Когда весь мой депозит уменьшился в 5 раз за пару минут, то почти невозможно

custom 54203157719914973071

11 Oct 2025, 11:59 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DefiscamcheckPhoto

$19.3B ликвидаций за сутки по данным Coinglass. Искренне сочувствую тем, кто в эту ночь был в лонгах. За 8 лет в индустрии я не видел такой ночи длинных ножей. Это было безумие, когда на некоторых цексах альты на твоих глазах падали на 80-90%, а стакан был пуст и заявки не исполнялись не на продажу / не на покупку. Забавно, как кит с гиперликвид открыл шорт на $1.1B за полчаса до каскада. При этом этот же аккаун

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @newmeta_market. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“newmeta” (@newmeta_market), 251 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newmeta_market.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.