Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,680–8,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 10:20
8,076
-2
6 Nov 2026, 11:36
8,078
+6
3 Nov 2026, 01:30
8,072
+4
30 Oct 2026, 22:29
8,068
+90
28 Oct 2026, 03:50
7,978
-2
25 Oct 2026, 13:44
7,980
+3
22 Oct 2026, 09:47
7,977
+22
19 Oct 2026, 05:17
7,955
+13
12 Oct 2026, 18:30
7,942
+7
5 Oct 2026, 19:58
7,935
+26
28 Sept 2026, 09:55
7,909
+47
18 Sept 2026, 18:20
7,862
+28
14 Sept 2026, 17:59
7,834
+10
11 Sept 2026, 05:55
7,824
+23
6 Sept 2026, 07:18
7,801
+29
1 Sept 2026, 21:46
7,772
+10
29 Aug 2026, 11:03
7,762
+21
26 Aug 2026, 08:17
7,741
-7
23 Aug 2026, 12:17
7,748
+6
20 Aug 2026, 00:53
7,742
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.3%
avg views ÷ 8,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
42 (2 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
13,730
Reactions total
174
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 01:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
463
Videos
2
Links
499
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
15m 59s
Average length
8m 00s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,345 reactions across 42 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
674
50.1%
👍
318
23.6%
🐳
133
9.89%
😁
92
6.84%
custom 5318773107207447403
62
4.61%
custom 5318778819513950243
24
1.78%
😈
19
1.41%
🤮
17
1.26%
🔥
6
0.446%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 42 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arcways. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Ну что продолжать мне ныть, что я ненавижу писать этот пост? Или это уже итак понятно. Стрик этих постов идет уже больше года, жестко.
📝Что было на прошлой недели:
1. JCT:
Сначала всё было сильно похоже на IRYS, но на деле оказалось, что все спреды изи пересиживались и их было достаточно много: из жбшный астер-бинанс, и бинанс-кукоин, и бинанс-битгет спот. Я немного пофлипал, но глобаль…
Давно не писал посты про наш сервис Arcways и автозалив, так-как не особо люблю это делать и что-то кому-то навязывать, но иногда надо, поэтому делаю.
Начну еще с того, что безумно рад и благодарен всей поддержке людей, как инфлов, так и анонимным смартикам без каналов, которые пользуются в целом всем сайтом, как платным, так и бесплатным функционалом. Это доверие трудно получать, особенно без вложений(не одной рекл…
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Что за даунское слово "раскайфовка", кайфа ноль, каждый понедельник каторга, потому что нужно писать этот пост. А еще очень трудно придумать, что писать в начале, ну типа, а что здесь придумать, снегоход пусть будет.
📝Что было на прошлой недели:
1. Взлом бинанс:
Все уже 1000 раз намусолили эту тему, написали все возможные ситуации что и как. Я нетакуся, поэтому не захотел про это писать…
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Ну если я скажу, что ненавижу понедельник, только из-за того, что нужно в канал писать этот пост, думаю я вас не удивлю. Но помимо этого я сегодня мало спал, из-за гребанного нового президента Бразилии Лулу. Недоволен.
📝Что было на прошлой недели:
1. EWZ:
Прикольно что сначала были разговоры, что вот движ появился, кто-то фомоебил, что мало позы нафилило, а в конце все ректанулись. У ме…
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Опять хочу застрелится, а не писать этот пост, еще и пол недели был в Варшаве, не за рабочем местом, многое пропустил, но зато познакомился с прикольными ребятами. С самой большой аурой денег был Рамар, постоянно всех называл мясом в крипте, а в Кодака даже хотел плюнуть.... :(
Но это все мелочи, самое крутой, сегодня ровно год (без одного дня), как я пишу понедельничные раскайфовки, бе…
Кстати хз почему я про это раньше не написал в канал и не прогревал, но когда была мета спредов RobinHood, на мексах был маленький макс сайз и многие юзали мульты.
У нас в автозаливе можно подключить несколько API и заливать условно 3 мекса и 1 бинанс. Возможно кому-то нужен этот функционал, у нас он уже давно есть.
Вот чутка пофлексил, ну и раз решил что-то написать в канал, то прикреплю сюда еще скрины последних …
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Честно говоря, меня пугает, что когда на прошлой недели не было темок у меня в голове были только мысли "а что я напишу в понедельничной раскайфовке", мне кажется я стал зависим.... Скоро у всех останется только два варианта: либо в рехаб, либо в дурку.
📝Что было на прошлой недели:
1. NATGAS
Надеюсь меня не застрелят, рол по газу достаточно большой, но проблема, что трудно найти где зах…
У нас там кстати редизайн вышел на сайте, кто не видел зайдите гляньте как вам
Многие уже итак видели, но я забыл об этом написать, но вот информирую.
Ну и конечно же можете подписку купить здесь
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Когда-то будет проще застрелится чем писать этот пост, 20 октября будет ровно год, как каждый понедельник я пишу подобный пост без пропусков (1 пропуск был). Ебать время быстро летит.
📝Что было на прошлой недели:
1. SAND:
Один из самых фришных спредов, заливался прям на много и вообще не сомневался, что он будет простыми, не веяло от него вайбом, что могут трахнуть, очень долго кормили …
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Чуть не втыканул написать этот ебаный пост, но вам повезло, не остаться вам без поста, но как всегда мега впадлу его делать.
📝Что было на прошлой недели:
1. ONE:
Когда уже эту хуйню сравняют, а то что-то затягивается. Но вообще очень много, всего что с ним придумать, и под открытие депов на бинанс гонять со спота мекса, и OKX фьюч, и кучу другого флипать, так особо всё перечислить. Глав…
🐉Понедельничная раскайфовка🐉
Начну с того, что я хз как при текущем рынке жить без автозалива. Очень много раскоров, вариаций спреда с одним и тем же тикером, фандосов, в которые нужно лить много сайза, а хочется иметь хороший спред входа, я хз как вы живете.
📝Что было на прошлой недели:
1. AIN:
Спред с которого можно было вынести ну супер дохуя. Альфа + бинанс одни из самых сейвовых спредов и в него можно было зал…
❤13👍9😈2
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @arcways. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@arcways edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ArcWays 🐉” (@arcways), 8,076 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arcways.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.