О здоровье, красоте, семье и жизни
Реклама: @workelmira +79152856066 Эля
Канал включен в перечень РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a3794624c8ba6dca8b57e7
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -430. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,546–63,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 16:10
60,833
-52
5 Nov 2026, 15:27
60,885
-35
4 Nov 2026, 17:09
60,920
-60
3 Nov 2026, 13:36
60,980
-74
2 Nov 2026, 10:29
61,054
-76
1 Nov 2026, 08:50
61,130
-27
31 Oct 2026, 08:36
61,157
-26
30 Oct 2026, 09:59
61,183
-37
29 Oct 2026, 12:00
61,220
-32
28 Oct 2026, 08:14
61,252
-63
27 Oct 2026, 05:21
61,315
-52
26 Oct 2026, 02:07
61,367
-54
25 Oct 2026, 03:05
61,421
-51
24 Oct 2026, 01:38
61,472
-31
22 Oct 2026, 22:31
61,503
-69
21 Oct 2026, 18:49
61,572
-68
20 Oct 2026, 12:19
61,640
-52
19 Oct 2026, 14:56
61,692
+8
18 Oct 2026, 11:48
61,684
-49
17 Oct 2026, 09:47
61,733
first reading
Engagement
184 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.09%
avg views ÷ 60,833 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,920
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 184 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
184 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
275,750
Reactions total
2,947
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,300
Videos
≈340
Links
≈158
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
34m 54s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,787 reactions across 182 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,105
69.5%
🔥
1,394
15.9%
🥰
512
5.83%
❤🔥
503
5.72%
😍
120
1.37%
👏
90
1.02%
😱
39
0.444%
😭
24
0.273%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 184 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,787 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 184 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lianashulginaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 184 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 56 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Гормоны: база, которую должна знать каждая📎
Когда я была на дефиците и снижала вес, я долго фокусировалась только на количестве еды и цифре на весах.
И очень недооценивала режим, сон, восстановление и что конкретно я ем.
А когда замечала, что у меня скачет аппетит, усиливаются отеки, меняется настроение, тяжело восстанавливаться – то начинала искать один волшебный продукт, БАД или лайфхак, как срочно все это испра…
Делайте так утром для бодрости, а вечером для расслабления✨
А вы знали, что массаж стоп связывают с разглаживанием морщин на лбу?))
Научных подтверждений такого эффекта нет, но это не повод отказываться от приятного ритуала.
Что нужно сделать⤵️
• наносим на стопы несколько капель эфирного масла
• делаем массаж на аппликаторе Кузнецова или любом массажном коврике
Пара минут утром – и вы почувствуете бодрость, зап…
«Еда больше не занимает весь мой день»
Помните Марию, победительницу нашего челленджа по питанию? Я уже рассказывала о ее старте в Re:Forma.
А сегодня я хочу показать первые фото ДО/ПОСЛЕ⤴️и результаты за несколько недель на программе персонального сопровождения🤍
Мария пришла к нам с непростыми отношениями с едой.
А сейчас рассказывает:
«Я просто поела – вкусно, сытно, полезно – и пошла дальше жить!»
За это вре…
Как вернуться в режим после паузы?
Недавно я болела и 2 недели вообще не тренировалась. И совершенно не переживала, что за это время потеряю форму.
Гораздо важнее в такой ситуации сделать паузу, выстроить бережный режим, нормально восстановиться и уже потом спокойно вернуться в свой привычный ритм.
Мы же не машины! Невозможно каждый день одинаково много работать, тренироваться, быть энергичными и выдавать стабильн…
Под вчерашней тренировкой получила вот такой комментарий⤴️ от Виктории
Виктория, спасибо вам большое🤍
Та прошлая спортивная версия вас никуда не делась! Просто сейчас у вас другой ритм жизни, работа, нагрузка – и, возможно, давно не было времени на себя.
Вам сейчас не обязательно срочно возвращаться в зал на 1-1,5 часа и пытаться стать как раньше. Начните с 20-30 минут дома, с пары тренировок в неделю – и постепен…
Быстрая тренировка на все тело🔥
#Лиана_тренировки
Не успеваете в зал на полноценную тренировку? Это не повод все отменить – просто сделайте то, на что есть время сегодня.
Записала для вас комплекс на 30 минут на все тело – ноги, ягодицы, спина, руки и кор⤴️
Делайте в комфортном темпе, следите за техникой и постепенно увеличивайте нагрузку.
Сохраняйте🤍
Мои планы, новые цели и чему я сейчас учусь
У меня сейчас столько всего интересного происходит – хочу поделиться с вами🤍
Проект растет, в программе Re:forma все больше участниц на личном сопровождении – поэтому работы у меня стало еще больше. Я этому безумно рада✨
И несмотря на возросшую нагрузку у меня какой-то невероятный порыв активно развиваться дальше и пробовать новое))
Я поступила учиться в институт и в ма…
Поддержка близких - бесценна🔥 Особенно если занят тренажер))
То чувство, когда рядом человек, который живет в таком же ритме и разделяет твои ценности🤍
Нежная запеканка с ягодами🍓🫐
#Лиана_рецепты
На этом фото из ресторана – панеттеоне, итальянский нежный десерт на основе теста на сливочном масле с кремом и ягодами
Нашей семье он настолько понравился, что я решила придумать его аналог, который можно быстро приготовить дома – при этом более сбалансированный по КБЖУ
Вдохновившись идеей, я сделала нежную творожную запеканку. Получается так же красиво, сладко и уютно…
❤41🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 184 posts we hold for @lianashulginaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Alenastewardess @talenastewardess · 25,872 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Не Kostenko.94 @kostenko1994 · 25,026 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
Maryme.23 @Maria_Melnikova23 · 103,370 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 September 2026
Life с Ханной 💋 @lifewithHanna · 88,537 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Анастасия Головинова @anastasiya_golovinova · 19,505 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 September 2026
nataly_frol @nataly_frol · 20,127 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 September 2026
Anna Buzova @annabuzova1 · 24,366 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
mariapoga_ @Mariapogas · 93,172 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
Катя ин Майами @katarina_elenik · 49,953 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
Курбан Омаров @zimatut · 106,209 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Будни Анны Михайловской @anna_mihailovskaya · 29,169 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
Регина Путешественница 🌍 @todorenkoregina · 97,318 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Валерия @valeriyaofficial · 24,273 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LIANA SHULGINA” (@lianashulginaa), 60,833 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lianashulginaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.