Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,609. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,706–97,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:20
95,947
-116
16 Sept 2026, 00:59
96,063
-35
14 Sept 2026, 08:41
96,098
-81
12 Sept 2026, 19:59
96,179
-106
11 Sept 2026, 00:19
96,285
+313
7 Sept 2026, 23:36
95,972
-11
5 Sept 2026, 00:21
95,983
-80
3 Sept 2026, 09:33
96,063
-65
2 Sept 2026, 00:34
96,128
-54
1 Sept 2026, 01:08
96,182
-55
31 Aug 2026, 02:13
96,237
-67
30 Aug 2026, 05:29
96,304
-67
29 Aug 2026, 04:14
96,371
-19
28 Aug 2026, 03:55
96,390
-15
27 Aug 2026, 02:18
96,405
-49
26 Aug 2026, 03:37
96,454
-69
25 Aug 2026, 00:15
96,523
-73
23 Aug 2026, 12:42
96,596
-76
22 Aug 2026, 01:58
96,672
-40
20 Aug 2026, 21:19
96,712
first reading
Engagement
178 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.07%
avg views ÷ 95,947 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,860
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
90
of 178 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
178 (3 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
437,430
Reactions total
9,028
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 23:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,530
Videos
≈1,790
Links
≈168
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,386 reactions across 178 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,875
54.2%
🔥
1,951
11.9%
👍
1,608
9.81%
😁
513
3.13%
🥰
509
3.11%
🙏
345
2.11%
🤣
329
2.01%
❤🔥
240
1.46%
🤮
236
1.44%
👏
203
1.24%
🤡
194
1.18%
👎
160
0.976%
😱
140
0.854%
💯
124
0.757%
💩
91
0.555%
🙈
87
0.531%
🎉
79
0.482%
🤬
79
0.482%
💘
71
0.433%
😍
69
0.421%
29 further kinds
483
2.95%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 178 of the 178 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Четвертый месяц проекта с Полиной: тренировки, прогулки, процедуры, работа с питанием, остановка веса и моменты, когда хочется всё бросить. Но именно из таких маленьких шагов и складывается результат. Поэтому мы показываем не только финальную точку, а весь путь, который проходим вместе.
К сожалению, волшебной таблетки не существует. Но есть инструменты, которые помогают пройти этот непростой путь легче. И самое важн…
Самыми страшными моментами в интервью для меня стали рассказы Ариэлы Самойловой. В 15 лет она распознаёт, когда отец под веществами. Она знает, как с ним говорить, что делать, чтобы не раздражать его ещё больше. Это опыт. Страшный опыт. Мне даже страшно это просто слушать, а она жила с этим кошмаром столько лет.
Мне всегда до боли жаль женщин, которые попали в ловушку неадеквата. Я понимаю, насколько тяжело сбежать …
Как неделю начнёшь, так она и пройдёт. Поэтому начинаем с хороших новостей: Стас Михайлов опроверг слухи о разводе с женой.
«Не верьте, что написано! Прекрасная жена, прекрасные дети! Порадуйтесь за нас: всё хорошо!» - заявил артист .
Пожалуй, этот отрывок из интервью Оксаны Самойловой — самый важный. Оксана, как и любая жертва, не разводилась, поддаваясь давлению Джигана.
Она уже хотела уйти в 2020 и 2022 годах, но ей не хватало сил. Каждый раз муж убеждал её, что своим уходом она разрушит семью и «бросит детей».
Каждая мама, школа, общество должны с детства внушать девочкам, что строить отношения с человеком с зависимостью — значит искалечить …
Марго Робби официально сменила фамилию на Акерли - спустя 10 лет после свадьбы.
Для кино она, скорее всего, сохранит сценический псевдоним Робби.
Забавное совпадение: статистика действительно показывает, что пары с общей фамилией реже разводятся. По данным Института семьи, супруги с разными фамилиями расстаются примерно на 50% чаще, а их браки в среднем длятся на 30% меньше.
Впрочем, психологи напоминают: дело не …
Никита Кологривый признался, что не платит алименты. Вместо этого он полностью содержит и дочь, и бывшую жену, и бывших тёщу с тестем.
Актёр считает, что если он взял когда-то на себя ответственность — надо обеспечивать тыл даже после отхода. Молодец! Есть у нас ответственные мужчины!
Для кого-то развод — это точка. Для Никиты Кологривого — совсем нет. Он прямо говорит: алиментов как таковых нет, потому что он взял…
Новость из мира параллельной реальности 😂
Ох уж эти журналисты! «Россияне бросились скупать Lamborghini». За 8 месяцев в России поставили на учёт 141 новый Lamborghini - рост на 48% к прошлому году.
А население страны - 146,1 млн человек. То есть машину купили 141 человек. В процентах от общего населения это примерно 0,0001%.
И вот на этом фоне новость звучит как «россияне бросились скупать»😂
Лерчек сейчас переживает не лучший период. Боли в спине и ногах настолько сильные, что передвигаться самостоятельно ей очень тяжело. Луис Сквиччиарини в сторис рассказал, что улучшений нет: блокада, сделанная после недавнего ухудшения, не дала результата.
Валерия отправилась на новое обследование. По её словам, МРТ спинного мозга вышло нечётким, поэтому процедуру повторят - нужно понять, есть ли метастазы и в чём пр…
Оксана Самойлова подала иск об ограничении Джигана в родительских правах.
Если всё, что вчера писали СМИ про Джигана, - правда, то это разумно. Но почему только сейчас, а не сразу после того безумного поступка?
Версий может быть несколько:
- закрыть вопрос перед органами опеки: они в любом случае начнут задавать вопросы;
- прогрев к интервью - но в это верить не хочется, ни одна разумная мать не станет из такой беды …
Как же хорошо жить, как прекрасно любить❤️
И это состояние счастья не про внешние факторы. Если ждать, что вокруг что-то случится и тебе станет хорошо, могут пройти годы, десятилетия, а счастье так и не наступит.
Надо просто изменить себя - и тогда изменится мир✨
❤117👍19🥰6
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @Mariapogas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Mariapogas edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Anna Buzova @annabuzova1 · 24,530 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
Не Kostenko.94 @kostenko1994 · 24,956 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
💫 Я вижу жизнь так 💫 @alianaustinenko · 37,363 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 31 August 2026
Аня Хилькевич @khilkevich_anna · 121,334 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
МАМАЕВА @alanamamaeva1 · 26,421 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
Варвина Наталья @varvina_n · 194,445 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Lerchek теперь тут @ler_chek_official · 273,938 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 16 August 2026
Виктория Боня @bonyaviktorya · 609,319 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
Life с Ханной 💋 @lifewithHanna · 89,131 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Бузова @byzovahouse · 408,444 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
Olya Des @olyades1 · 30,077 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 September 2026
Ольга Орлова @olgaorlova · 173,926 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Samoylovaoxana @sammyfam · 690,443 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 September 2026
Чат с Дарьей Пынзарь 🌸 @DaryaPinzar86 · 68,817 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
Ольга Гажиенко @olgagajienko1 · 49,309 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
KRISTI THE ONE ❤️ @dudkovi · 99,393 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
Курбан Омаров @zimatut · 100,627 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Горячие новости шоу-бизнеса @novosti_zvezd_showbiz · 66,661 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
Настя Созоник @NASTYASOZONIKK · 181,750 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
LERADANYA_life @leradanya_lifeee · 211,253 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 August 2026
love_is_top @love_is_top · 20,494 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 September 2026
Регина Путешественница 🌍 @todorenkoregina · 98,623 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Юлия Барановская @ybaranovskaya_tv · 46,422 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Торнике Квитатиани @tokorocko · 22,101 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mariapoga_” (@Mariapogas), 95,947 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mariapogas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.