Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

mariapoga_

@Mariapogas

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

97,105subscribers

-451 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768570060
TypeChannel
Username@Mariapogas
DescriptionМария Погребняк Продюсер, общественный деятель, мама 4-х сыновей. Реклама: @dinatimer Регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3GQsnA
Created25 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mariapogas

Growth

97,10597,55697,330.56 August 2026 — 97,556 subscribers6 August 2026 — 97,531 subscribers7 August 2026 — 97,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 97,448 subscribers9 August 2026 — 97,404 subscribers10 August 2026 — 97,344 subscribers11 August 2026 — 97,230 subscribers12 August 2026 — 97,160 subscribers13 August 2026 — 97,105 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -451. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97,037–97,624 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:4597,105-55
12 Aug 2026, 21:3497,160-70
11 Aug 2026, 21:0497,230-114
10 Aug 2026, 19:1697,344-60
9 Aug 2026, 17:0297,404-44
8 Aug 2026, 17:3897,448-45
7 Aug 2026, 17:1297,493-38
6 Aug 2026, 15:5597,531-25
6 Aug 2026, 09:4697,556first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.58%
avg views ÷ 97,105 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,390
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held35 (3 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total223,580
Reactions total3,284
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,310
Videos
1,720
Links
166

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 11s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,284 reactions across 35 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,65250.3%
🔥33010.0%
👍2537.70%
🤡1394.23%
🤮1374.17%
🤣1273.87%
😁1113.38%
❤‍🔥662.01%
🙈531.61%
🥴461.40%
💩441.34%
🙏401.22%
👏391.19%
😭361.10%
👎351.07%
😱320.974%
🥰300.914%
💋190.579%
💔160.487%
💘160.487%
15 further kinds631.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈3,580 views66 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Где интересно производители берут сладкие яблоки? Или всё-таки детские пюре содержат сахар?

35👍21😁4💋3💘1🔥1🤝1

13 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC≈4,740 views250 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

От души поздравляю Анну с рождением дочки 🙌 👶 А имя у малышки замечательное - Мария!

208🥰19👏11👍7💘3❤‍🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈4,800 views56 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Печальная новость для родителей: Минпросвещения РФ не планирует отменять домашние задания для школьников, заявил глава министерства Сергей Кравцов. Напомню, до 1 сентября 18 дней😜

😭3616💔4

12 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈6,330 views112 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Даша Инстасамка передумала уезжать из России. Просто хайпанула. Вы рады?

🤮59🤡27💩203🤣2👍1

12 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈6,790 views131 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Как вам наша команда?🤪

80🔥27❤‍🔥9💋7😱4💘2🤮2

12 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈6,800 views121 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Все! Джорджина больше не невеста — они с Роналду поженились. Однако подробности свадьбы пока неизвестны, ждём фотоотчёт

74🔥27👍6🥰5🍾4💋4👎1

11 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈6,930 views32 reactionsread 14 August 2026

https://t.me/ostorozhno_novosti/53399 Продолжается рост числа жертв домашнего насилия, а закон о домашнем насилии до сих пор лежит под сукном🥲

16🤮5👍4🙈4🤡2😢1

11 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC≈6,660 views57 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Экстрасенсы оказались не экстрасенсами, а актёрами! 😣 Вот это да. Гендиректор «Газпром-Медиа Холдинга» Александр Жаров рассказал, что в «Битве экстрасенсов» участниками шоу являются артисты, а не маги и колдуны. Многие из них, став звёздами, начинают использовать свои образы для разного рода заработка.

🙈3310👎7🥱5👍2

11 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈7,340 views146 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Счастливая Энн Хэтэуэй и ее беременный живот. Смело? Ряд поклонников считает, что не стоит так откровенно демонстрировать свою 🤰 беременность

81🔥33👎15👍8😍5😱3❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈7,690 views128 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Инстасамка сообщила, что уехала из России навсегда. Опять и снова. В 2022 Даша уже уезжала, но что-то пошло не так😉

🤡55🤮36👍129💩8🤣4👏2🌚1

11 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈7,370 views54 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Все проснулись?

🤡31🤮9💩64🤣3👍1

10 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈8,990 views166 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Лерчек больше не держит зла на хейтеров. После того как она столкнулась с онкологией, её взгляд на недоброжелателей кардинально изменился. «Смысла обижаться нет. Они делают это не просто так. У них в жизни нет приятных эмоций... Они в состоянии здорового человека не способны делать то, что делаю я, находясь в четвертой стадии рака желудка», - заявила Валерия

119🙏40👎5❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Mariapogas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 264,789 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Аня Хилькевич
@khilkevich_anna · 119,942
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
Варвина Наталья
@varvina_n · 196,366
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Виктория Боня
@bonyaviktorya · 625,602
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
Бузова
@byzovahouse · 413,368
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
Ольга Орлова
@olgaorlova · 176,538
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Настя Созоник
@NASTYASOZONIKK · 184,050
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
HELEN YES
@Helen_yes1 · 118,713
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 August 2026
ВСЕ РЕАЛИТИ
@vsereality · 119,700
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
Ксения Бородина
@borodylia0803 · 928,343
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q134451213 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelMaria Pogrebnyak
DescriptionRussian socialite

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mariapoga_” (@Mariapogas), 97,105 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mariapogas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.