Photo, posted without a caption
👍11🎉1

Channel
@les_clefs_du_bien
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,546subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001194616989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @les_clefs_du_bien |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/les_clefs_du_bien |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 20,546 | -5 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 20,551 | -4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 20,555 | -15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 20,570 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 20,566 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 20,568 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 20,578 | +13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 20,565 | +28 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 20,537 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:34 | 20,533 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 20,538 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:46 | 20,535 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 20,539 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 20,540 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 20,547 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 20,548 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 20,551 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 20,553 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 20,554 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 20,561 | first reading |
88 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 88 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,363 reactions across 87 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,451 | 61.4% | |
| 💯 | 342 | 14.5% | |
| 🤝 | 275 | 11.6% | |
| 👏 | 101 | 4.27% | |
| 🏆 | 73 | 3.09% | |
| ✍ | 70 | 2.96% | |
| ⚡ | 24 | 1.02% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 0.846% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.296% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍11🎉1
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Nous lançons une collecte afin de venir en aide à une personne qui traverse actuellement une situation de détresse particulièrement difficile et qui a besoin d'un soutien financier. 🎯 Objectif : 1 000 € Le Prophète ﷺ a dit : « Celui qui soulage un croyant d'une difficulté parmi les difficultés de ce bas-monde, Allāh le soulagera d'une difficulté parmi les difficultés du Jour de la Résurrect…
👍5🤝2💯1
Ibn Mass'oud رضي الله عنه a dit : Deux choses sont destructrices: L'auto satisfaction Et le désespoir. Sheykh AbdeRazzaq al Badr حفظه الله dit : Ces 2 choses sont citées ensemble quant à leur caractère destructeur car le désespéré ne cherche plus le bonheur à cause de l'intensité de son désespoir, Et celui qui est ébloui par sa personne (autosatisfait) ne le cherche pas non plus, car il pense qu'il l'a acquis et…
💯14👍12🤝2
‼️ Celui qui délaisse la prière Cheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah – qu'Allāh lui fasse miséricorde – a dit : 🔥 Celui qui délaisse la prière Est pire que le voleur, le buveur d'alcool, le fornicateur et le consommateur de haschisch. ‼️تارك الصلاة قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية - رحمه الله - : 🔥 #تارك_الصلاة، أشر من السارق، وشارب الخمر، والزاني، وآكل الحشيشة . 📚 الفتاوى (50/22) Ils font les éloges de l'occident Pour …
👍11🤝3🏆2💯1
👉 Afin que ton coeur s'apaise enfin... 📔 Cheikh abd ar-Razzaq -حفظه الله- a dit : "Ce coeur, ce morceau de chair, il a été créé pour le tawhid ! C'est pour cela qu'il a été créé . Ainsi s'il n'est pas occupé par le tawhid alors il est troublé ! Il est ainsi touché par l'angoisse, la détresse... et il sera touché par ce qui le touchera... Le remède de tout cela est qu'il revienne à ce pourquoi il a été créé... Le…
💯16🤝11🎉4⚡2
Sheykh AbdeRazzaq Al Badr حفظه الله: Point de blâme, ô serviteurs d'Allāh, sur un père ou une mère qui s'efforce à ce que son fils réussisse dans les examens de cette vie d'ici bas, point de blâme sur lui, plutôt, cela relève de l'éducation complète et du perfectionnement de l'orientation Cependant, le blâme, tout le blâme se trouve dans le fait que ceci soit la limite de sa préoccupation, et tout ce que sa connais…
💯17👍9⚡1
👉 Parmi les choses destructrices... 📔 Cheikh ibn Tayamiyya -رحمه الله- a dit : "Certes, il se peut que la personne sait que la vérité est avec autre que lui, et malgré cela il nie sciemment à cause de sa jalousie envers lui ou qu'il recherche à être au dessus de lui, ou par passion de l'âme ! Et cette passion le mène à transgresser vis-à-vis de lui, et de repousser ce qu'il dit par tous les moyens, alors que dans …
👍18💯4🏆2🤝1
Le savantissime Salih Al-Fawzan - qu'Allah le préserve - a dit : Certains prédicateurs aujourd’hui n’ont pas de science, mais savent parler, sortir des paroles inutiles et faire des discours. Mais il n'a aucune science, de sorte que si la moindre ambiguïté lui était présentée ou si on lui posait la moindre question sur ce qui est interdit et ce qui est permis, il serait confus à ce sujet. (i'anatou-l-moustafid p. …
👍14⚡2🤝2💯1
📔 Ibn al Qayyim -رحمه الله- a dit : "L'amour de la science et sa recherche est la base de toute obéissance ! Et l'amour de la dounya et de l'argent et sa recherche est la base de toute mauvaise action !" 📗 مفتاح دار السعادة (٤١٩/١) •┈•◈❒✹◉✹❒◈•┈• ✋🏻 𝒎𝒐𝒅𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒆 ⛔️ 📲 https://t.me/les_clefs_du_bien
👍19🤝3🎉2💯2
Cheikh Soulaymane Ar-Ruhaylī حفظه الله a dit « Par Allāh, personne ne nous importe [face à cela]. Par Allāh, même si tous les gens nous insultaient, même s’ils s’unissaient tous contre nous, par Allāh, ils ne feraient pas bouger un seul cheveu en nous. Nous sommes sur la Sunnah : nous écoutons et obéissons au détenteur musulman de l’autorité, tant qu’il ne s’agit pas de désobéir à Allāh سبحانه و تعالى. Nous le proc…
👍10🤝7👏3
📌سرُّ الفاتحة ومقتضى العبودية والاستعانة #قال_شيخنا_عمرو_فهمي_رحمه_الله: «قال بعض السلف: الفاتحة سرُّ القرآن، وسرُّ الفاتحة: ﴿إِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ﴾؛ فالأول تبرُّؤٌ من الشرك، والثاني تبرُّؤٌ من الحول والقوة، والتفويض إلى الله عز وجل» 💿 #شرح_كتاب_تطهير_الجنان_الدرس: (١) Le secret de la (sourate) al Fatiha et les implications de l'état d'adoration et de la demande d'aide (à Allāh) Notre sheykh …
👍14💯7✍1🤝1
Habib ibn Hajar (qu’Allāh lui fasse miséricorde) a dit : « Il était dit : Comme la foi est belle lorsqu’elle est embellie par la science ! Comme la science est belle lorsqu’elle est embellie par les œuvres ! Comme les œuvres sont belles lorsqu’elles sont embellies par la douceur ! Et rien n’a été associé à une autre chose d’une manière plus belle que la science associée à l'indulgence. » قال حبيبُ بنُ حجَرٍ- رحمه ا…
👍20🏆4🤝3
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @les_clefs_du_bien. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐋𝐄𝐒 𝐂𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐒 𝐃𝐔 𝐁𝐈𝐄𝐍” (@les_clefs_du_bien), 20,546 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/les_clefs_du_bien.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.