Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for кртбл / брендинг медиа

Channel

кртбл / брендинг медиа

@krut_bl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,086subscribers

-88 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001890193251
TypeChannel
Username@krut_bl
DescriptionПознавательно о брендах Автор — Вадим Богдан, ✏️ @vvad1m, https://vbogdan.ru/
Created15 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/krut_bl

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0867,1767,1316 August 2026 — 7,174 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,175 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,176 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,171 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,165 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,173 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,165 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,167 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,158 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,148 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,162 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,158 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,144 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,115 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,102 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,094 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,087 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,093 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,089 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,092 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,091 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,088 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,086 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 91 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,073–7,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 10:397,086-2
2 Nov 2026, 02:557,088-3
29 Oct 2026, 19:087,091-1
26 Oct 2026, 12:407,092+3
23 Oct 2026, 04:577,089-4
20 Oct 2026, 11:497,093+6
17 Oct 2026, 18:097,087-7
14 Oct 2026, 12:197,094-8
10 Oct 2026, 19:017,102-13
4 Oct 2026, 22:157,115-29
25 Sept 2026, 22:167,144-14
17 Sept 2026, 07:577,158-4
8 Sept 2026, 22:177,162+14
3 Sept 2026, 06:597,148-10
31 Aug 2026, 08:087,158-9
27 Aug 2026, 22:127,167+2
24 Aug 2026, 21:247,165-8
20 Aug 2026, 23:397,173+8
17 Aug 2026, 22:237,165-6
14 Aug 2026, 12:367,171first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.81%
avg views ÷ 7,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
482
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held80 (31 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total14,953
Reactions total426
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 03:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,840
Videos
≈1,030
Links
≈3,680

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 21s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,083 reactions across 80 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29827.5%
😁29227.0%
❤16715.4%
🔥12411.4%
🤣312.86%
💯191.75%
😭181.66%
👀161.48%
🥰161.48%
😱121.11%
🤡111.02%
🙈100.923%
🤯70.646%
⚡60.554%
👎60.554%
🥴60.554%
👏50.462%
❤‍🔥40.369%
🐳40.369%
💔40.369%
13 further kinds272.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,083 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 80 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krut_bl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (41.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:54 UTC267 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

- тебе на "Э" - Эзотерика - а тебе на "Я" - Яндекс 😊 Кртбл —познавательно о брендинге | YouTube

😁18

10 Nov 2026, 09:26 UTC389 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Три неудобных вопроса Дмитрию Иванченко, сооснователю и творческому директору PinotAgency #аскобл 1. Какую услугу брендинговые агентства продолжают продавать, хотя её реальная ценность для бизнеса уже под большим вопросом? Мне кажется, ценность любой отдельной услуги зависит от того, как она связана с остальными решениями бизнеса. Но если нужно назвать конкретную услугу, то я назову позиционирование ради позиционир…

👍5

10 Nov 2026, 09:17 UTC469 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Три неудобных вопроса Максу Федорову, продюсеру бренд-артели FЁDOROV, тг канал #аскобл 1. Какую услугу брендинговые агентства продолжают продавать, хотя её реальная ценность для бизнеса уже под большим вопросом? Платформа бренда. В чистом виде она никому не нужна, потому что никто не понимает как с ней работать. Большое количество красивых слов, которое ни на что не влияет на старте нового бизнеса. Достаточно фокус…

👍4

10 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC410 views7 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Три неудобных вопроса Надежде Паршиной, основателю и генеральному директору агентства Ohmybrand, тг канал #аскобл 1. Какую услугу брендинговые агентства продолжают продавать, хотя её реальная ценность для бизнеса уже под большим вопросом? В первую очередь надо сказать, что еще до распространения ai многие уже работали как ai - т.е. выполняли алгоритмическую работу, не включая особо голову. И под раздачу с ai такие …

👍5🤝2

10 Nov 2026, 05:33 UTC423 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

На тебе, получай, Белевская Пастила, теперь у нас есть белок протеин..... https://t.me/tohack_strategy/199 😊 Кртбл —познавательно о брендинге | YouTube

😁7😱3

9 Nov 2026, 19:26 UTC463 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Клиент: так-так, нам нужна команда с подтвержденным опытом именно в плавленных сырах, с успешным опытом..... Агентство: Изольда Михайловна, давайте сразу к 747 слайду...... #агентствобл Ладно, так должно быть понятнее 😊 Кртбл —познавательно о брендинге | YouTube

😁4👏2🙈2

9 Nov 2026, 10:27 UTC489 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Наши снова взяли часовой «ОСКАР» #крутобл Российский часовщик Константин Чайкин второй раз стал лауреатом Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève (GPHG), главной часовой премии мира. В этот раз жюри отметило его сверхтонкие механические часы ThinKing Mystery толщиной всего 1,65 мм. Номинация «За дерзость». Первую награду Чайкин получил в 2018 году. До него ни один российский часовщик не побеждал на GPHG дважды. А незад…

👍12🔥11💩3😁3❤2

9 Nov 2026, 04:47 UTC521 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

А теперь о погоде #морнингбл

😁12❤6😭4🔥2👍1💔1🥱1

8 Nov 2026, 13:27 UTC492 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Что это за логотип? #аскобл ответ в комментах, но сразу не смотри, разгадай иностранную загадку 😊 Кртбл — познавательно о брендинге | YouTube

🔥5🗿3💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @krut_bl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@krut_bl edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Полезный Парфун
@ParfunA · 20,653
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 September 2026
Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 129,017
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Котлер.Media
@atlasonair · 31,886
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Акулыч в недвижке | Роман Абдуллин | KROME Group
@roman_abdullin_plus · 36,623
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 31 August 2026
Дизайн-снайпер
@designsniper · 27,989
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
гура́
@creativeee · 59,594
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
Бренды на коне
@brand_horse · 139,218
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
mads media
@mads_courses · 25,857
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
ХОТ ДИДЖИТАЛ от Влада Ситникова
@HotDigital · 22,420
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Н — Дэйта Фэктори
@nielsenrussia · 32,533
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 4 September 2026
FMCG Report
@fmcg_ru · 43,542
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
СберМаркетинг
@sbermarketing · 310,027
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Рекламщик от Бога
@Digitalmrktng · 20,055
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Креативный Маркетинг
@AdPoster · 20,871
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 September 2026
WOW Реклама | Маркетинг
@wowadvertise · 28,234
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Связь Вишневского
@pokamojno · 23,322
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 154,206
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
Постмаркетинг
@pstmarketing · 64,038
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
SETTERS Media
@setters · 82,535
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 172,106
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Sostav
@sostav · 56,462
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
Маркетинговый ход
@MarketingPloy · 69,278
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Партизанский Маркетинг
@GuerrillaMarketing · 105,260
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кртбл / брендинг медиа” (@krut_bl), 7,086 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krut_bl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.