Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KIRAFOREX SYNTHETICS 👸

Channel

KIRAFOREX SYNTHETICS 👸

@kiraforexsynth

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,371subscribers

-676 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831024416
TypeChannel
Username@kiraforexsynth
DescriptionTHIS IS A CHANNEL ESTABLISHED WITH THE VISION OF EQUIPPING INDIVIDUALS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE TO TRADE SYNTHETICS INDICES AND GAIN FINANCIAL FREDOM. For more info - message https://wa.me/message/WELLF6ZJDKQXA1 send subscribe to @assistantkirabot
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kiraforexsynth

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kira_forex61 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@kira_forex (47–14)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 165 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @kiraforexsynth — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

28,37129,10728,7397 August 202612 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net -676. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,261–29,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 17:2228,371-15
10 Nov 2026, 11:5928,386-13
8 Nov 2026, 20:0128,399-43
7 Nov 2026, 10:5628,442+1
6 Nov 2026, 10:4028,441-6
5 Nov 2026, 12:4628,447+1
4 Nov 2026, 13:5428,446-3
3 Nov 2026, 16:4628,449-5
2 Nov 2026, 16:5128,454-8
1 Nov 2026, 16:2428,462-5
31 Oct 2026, 13:4728,467-20
30 Oct 2026, 14:2928,487-41
29 Oct 2026, 11:0428,528-6
28 Oct 2026, 07:1628,534-31
27 Oct 2026, 04:5028,565-11
26 Oct 2026, 07:0728,576-1
25 Oct 2026, 07:3928,577-5
24 Oct 2026, 10:4528,582-8
23 Oct 2026, 13:4928,590-10
22 Oct 2026, 14:2028,600first reading

Engagement

441 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.55%
avg views ÷ 28,371 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
116 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.812%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
117
of 441 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 111 of 116 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held441 (1 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total182,666
Reactions total1,410
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 01:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,150
Videos
≈85
Links
≈1,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,944 reactions across 423 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,89748.7%
❤2,41440.6%
👍2353.95%
🥰1772.98%
🙏981.65%
👌681.14%
🎉340.572%
🕊210.353%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 426 of the 441 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,944 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 441 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 117 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC479 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @kira_forex

Final Opportunity of the Year: VIP Access Opens Tomorrow‼️‼️‼️ Our end of year VIP promotion kicks off tomorrow for a strict 48-hour window. We are heading into the final stretch of the trading year, the market is offering prime setups, and you want to be positioned correctly with high probability setups. Secure your spot before enrollment closes in two days. Serious growth requires serious positioning. Let’s fin…

❤7

11 Nov 2026, 05:24 UTC988 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @kira_forex

WELCOME TO KIRAFOREX TRADING ACADEMY📈📉📉📉📉📉 If you are new or already existing trader to the markets, we’re excited to help you jumpstart your trading journey. We recommend starting with Deriv—a reliable and beginner-friendly platform.👇👇👇👇👇👇 🚀 Getting Started in 3 Simple Steps: 1. Create Your Account: https://t.deriv.link?t=642J9K6PYXX5 and select your preferred currency. 2. Verify & Fund: Complete your prof…

❤5

10 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,410 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Leave your honest feedback in the comments on this video.

❤6🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,240 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @kira_forex

https://youtu.be/WCeec1DcWbM?si=yObbQ_YpxAJt8pFo

❤12

10 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC≈1,290 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @kira_forex

New upload incoming: Smart Money Concepts (SMC) Ep. 2 goes live on YouTube shortly. Grab your notebooks link dropping the second it’s up! ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

❤5👍4

9 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,900 views26 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

📅 Last week (02/11 to 08/11) KIRAFOREX VIP Synthetics Trade Log

❤17🔥6🥰2🕊1

9 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,600 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @kira_forex

This is it our final live session of the year. No more excuses, no more waiting. Take control of your trading future before we shut the doors for 2026. Strictly limited: Only 10 slots available. Miss this? Your next chance won’t be until next year. Send us a message now to lock in your seat! 🚀

❤4

9 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @kira_forexPhoto

Join us for the Advanced Forex Mastery Session and learn how to move beyond basic concepts to execute like a pro. We are breaking down high-probability setups, risk management, and market discipline to help you navigate the charts with precision. Date: 15th November FEE: USD 200.00 Spaces are limited! Secure your spot now: 📲 WhatsApp: https://wa.me/message/WELLF6ZJDKQXA1(Bless) Telegram: @ghfxkira 📞 Call Us…

8 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,780 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026

In this video, I’m breaking down the exact, no nonsense strategy I used to secure profits in the market. Forget the lagging indicators and trading noise we are focusing purely on clean price action, market structure,

❤14

8 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,580 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @kira_forex

https://youtu.be/5mPVBQriNiA

❤9

7 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC≈2,080 views25 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Close any runner on volatility90 (1s) if you are still holding any🔥💯🤌... Congratulations, massive dump

🔥21❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 441 posts we hold for @kiraforexsynth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Oct 2026, 09:34 UTCAnonymous Poll191 voters

Should I host a paid class teaching you how to trade synthetic indices step-by-step?

  1. Yes73%
  2. No30%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Oct 2026, 16:54 UTCAnonymous Poll284 voters

SHOULD WE RUN A 90% OFF PROMO ON OUR VIP?

  1. Yes we need it.94%
  2. No we don’t need it7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTCAnonymous Poll2,050 voters approx.

📊 Curious anonymous Question. How much do you make trading? Anonymous Poll

  1. -7 figures a year13%
  2. -6 figures a year5%
  3. -5 figures a year3%
  4. -4 figures a year5%
  5. -3 figures a year11%
  6. - breakeven21%
  7. -negative42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Sept 2026, 08:21 UTCAnonymous Poll183 voters

When your setup appears, What do you do?

  1. • Enter immediately16%
  2. • Wait for confirmation57%
  3. • Wait for retest14%
  4. • Sometimes hesitate7%
  5. • Depends on the setup8%
  6. •I don't even know my setup13%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTCAnonymous Poll378 voters

What's currently your biggest challenge with trading synthetic indices? (PLEASE ENGAGE ON THIS POOL)

  1. A. Finding good entries45%
  2. B. Holding trades too long26%
  3. C. Exiting too early21%
  4. D. Risk management29%
  5. E. Controlling emotions27%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTCAnonymous Poll156 voters

Did you meet your trading goal for the month of August? 🎯

  1. 🟢 Yes, I hit my goal10%
  2. 🟡 Partially — I made progress23%
  3. 🔴 No, I fell short57%
  4. ⚪ I didn’t set a goal for August15%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 441 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

KIRAFOREX💎
@kira_forex · 32,035
#1
KOJOFOREX
@kojoforextrades · 290,258
#2
FirePips Forex Academy (Jeffforex)
@firepipsignals · 234,306
#3
HABBYfOREX UNIVERSITY🥇
@habbyforex · 300,721
#4
SERENDIPITY || TRADES 📊📈📉- DR ELVIS
@serendipitytradeacademy · 125,266
#5
RICK Fx COMMUNITY 📈📉
@rickfxcommunity · 19,174
#6
YSDB FOREX COMMUNITY
@ysdbcommunity · 10,566
#7
KOMMONFOREX COMMUNITY 📈📉🎯
@Kommonforextrades · 19,349
#8
Eyram Dela | Fan Channel ❤️❤️
@marketgodcommunity · 10,004
#9
SNIPERFX COMMUNITY
@SniperfxGang · 8,767
#10
NDUBEST FOREX CHANNEL
@ndubestfx_channel · 4,991
#11
TBD FOREX TRADING
@traderbendavecommunity · 2,084
#12
KingFtp_Fx®
@KingFtpForex · 45,656
#13
KERNELSTICKS 10PIPS SL TRADES 📈🐐📉
@Kernelsticks · 5,500
#14
HARVEST SMART MONEY CONCEPT FOREX SIGNALS
@hdhsisjdj · 501
#15
Vix Mayor⭕️
@VixMayor · 12,564
#16
KELVIN_TALENT TRADING ARENA
@kelvin_talent · 81,535
#17
KEMMATRADES FOREX COMMUNITY®️
@kemmatradesforex · 3,103
#18
XM Trading Academy
@ahmedfreesignals · 301,153
#19
EMMANUEL FOREX COMMUNITY🧑‍💻📈
@FXGOAT1 · 115,263
#20
THEFOREXPROFETEX
@tradewithforexprofetex · 10,001
#21
THAPELO FOREX COMMUNITY🧑‍💻📈
@FXGOAT0 · 106,196
#22
SDX-TRADES & CHART COMMUNITY 📊📈📉
@sdxcrypto · 9,132
#23
Reef Forex Academy (Mukasa Reef)
@reefforexacademy · 11,807
#24
Techriz💯📈
@Techriztm · 47,135
#25
OLA-BTC TRADING ACADEMY
@olabtccomty · 510 (as read 9 September 2026)
#26
GENESIS CAPITAL 📈📉
@genesisforexcapital · 320
#27
Ben, Gold Trader
@bengoldtrader · 354,993
#28
FLASH TAKE PROFITs
@flashtps · 2,776
#29
👸 ICTQUEEN 👑
@ICTQUEENFLASHCARD · 22,257
#30
CHRIS DOLLARS
@chrisdollarsdpa · 1,517
#31
FXRICH
@fxrichhhh · 5,615
#32
JDI TRADING HUB🦉
@jdicyber · 7,974
#33
SYNTHETIC GODDESS LAB ⚡️✨
@syntheticgoddesschannel · 11,100
#34
ASA-B free Signal and Setup page📉📈📊📊💵💵
@asab93signal · 439
#35
FT Community | Free Signals
@freedomtradehouse · 16,346
#36
CTG | Certified Traders Group
@certifiedtradersgroup · 11,370
#37
LALIL TRADINGX🥀🪦💐
@laliltradingx · 332
#38
STITCHFOREX TRADING COMMUNITY 📊📈📉
@stitchforextrades · 1,783
#39
Forex Bulls Academy (Vidollar)
@theforexbulls · 109,783
#40
Marrese Cira 📈
@marresecira · 5,418
#41
FXPIPSKILLER
@FXPIPSKILLER · 3,665
#42
Volatility Plus
@beststrateg · 6,783
#43
Free Volatility Index FX Signals 📊📈
@freevolatilityfxsignals · 17,453
#44
APEX FX ACADEMY
@apexfxacademysignals · 431
#45
THISSDAX KITCHEN👨‍🍳
@thedaxbrand · 101,040
#46
ENTRY HUNTERS
@entry_hunterss · 419
#47
Free Synthetic Indices Signals Zone📈📉
@forextradingsignalsclub · 10,014
#48
Aart Flash card 📗📈💰
@AartFcard · 9,842
#49
LOWKEY FX FREE CHANNEL
@Lowkey_Fx_Telegram_channel · 32,560
#50
Market Makers
@mmsignalsfx · 101,766
#51
Forex Thugs📈🥷
@docsilverforexthugs · 1,100
#52
Trader Bennie™ | 🧘🏽‍♂️💰
@traderbennie · 1,193
#53
BOAH FOREX ACADEMY🔥
@boahfx · 1,887
#54
KELVO KING FREE TRADING COMMUNITY
@Kelvokingfxcommunity · 5,311
#55
cleverwealthsynthetic
@cleverwealthsynthetic · 7,166
#56
PIPSCITY - RTM
@pipscitytrades · 5,807
#57
Mr P Fx 🚀 UNIVERSITY
@mrpfxuniversity · 48,347
#58
CLASSYFOREX
@classyforex2 · 19,432
#59
SOFTLIFEFX ACADEMY
@Softlifefxacademy · 599
#60
JeaFx
@therealjeafx · 28,109
#61
VIP GOLD SIGNALS️
@vipgoldsignals_1778 · 28,675
#62
O1C
@theO1C · 14,736
#63
ExFunded
@expressfunded · 7,855
#64
TRADE-WITH-KENE ( FREE GROUP)
@Tradewithkene · 41,077
#65
Big Jay’s Trading Hub🪙
@bigjayhubb · 2,017
#66
TONY SNIP3R COMMUNITY
@tonysnip3rcommunity · 58,194
#67
Trade With PDC
@PrivateDcFreeSignals · 2,549
#68
Derive VOLALITY index KNIGHTS
@DeriveVIKnightsPtY · 14,281
#69
SKY FX COMMUNITY
@sky_fx_community · 707
#70
Trading with Mo
@TWMFREESIGNALS · 1,079
#71
Gold Trader Noel Reys 👑
@noelreysfxsignals · 7,909
#72
FarmercistJournal
@farmercistjournal0 · 39,768
#73
Volatility 75 STUNNER (GOLD) XAUUSD Channel
@stunnnerv75freetelegram · 40,095
#74
Zilo Fx Public Channel📢📈
@zilofxchannel · 2,485
#75
HUMBLE FOREX COMMUNITY 📊
@humbleforextrades · 2,049
#76
FBS Analytics
@fbsanalytics · 85,582
#77
Swingtradinglab
@alexsetandforget · 208,611
#78
Tony Brave Fx
@tonybravefxFREECHANNEL · 2,591
#79
Home of Profit
@Sniperfx10 · 4,218
#80
BeatBEN Capital(BeatBEN Apple City)
@beatbencapitalofficial · 1,767
#81
LITEFINANCE GHANA
@LitefinanceGhana · 848
#82

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KIRAFOREX💎
@kira_forex · 32,035
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
SERENDIPITY || TRADES 📊📈📉- DR ELVIS
@serendipitytradeacademy · 125,266
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
FirePips Forex Academy (Jeffforex)
@firepipsignals · 234,306
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
KOJOFOREX
@kojoforextrades · 290,258
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
HABBYfOREX UNIVERSITY🥇
@habbyforex · 300,721
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
KOMMONFOREX COMMUNITY 📈📉🎯
@Kommonforextrades · 19,349
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
RICK Fx COMMUNITY 📈📉
@rickfxcommunity · 19,174
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 October 2026
EMMANUEL FOREX COMMUNITY🧑‍💻📈
@FXGOAT1 · 115,263
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
THAPELO FOREX COMMUNITY🧑‍💻📈
@FXGOAT0 · 106,196
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
DR BILLS-ACADEMY📈📉
@drbillsbroadcastplatform · 18,449
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
Trade With Chantel
@TradeWithChantelTelegram · 32,712
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Volatility 75 STUNNER (GOLD) XAUUSD Channel
@stunnnerv75freetelegram · 40,095
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Forex Bulls Academy (Vidollar)
@theforexbulls · 109,783
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
THE COFFIEFX
@Thecoffiefxlll · 38,448
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
CLASSYFOREX
@classyforex2 · 19,432
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 September 2026
NDEMAZEAH GODLOVE
@ndemazeah · 23,735
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
Naijasermon.com (Channel)
@naijasermonsng · 41,705
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KIRAFOREX SYNTHETICS 👸” (@kiraforexsynth), 28,371 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiraforexsynth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.