Channel
ENTRY HUNTERS
@entry_hunterss
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
522subscribers
-6,563 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001786515164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @entry_hunterss |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/entry_hunterss |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 522 | +518 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 20:42 | 4 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 3 | -6,968 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 6,971 | -31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 7,002 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 7,024 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 7,033 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 7,033 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 7,035 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 7,044 | -15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 7,059 | -8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 7,067 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 7,086 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 7,085 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Onetrickforexhub · 24,076
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
@Lowkey_Fx_Telegram_channel · 31,366
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
@mrpfxuniversity · 48,721
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
@theforexbulls · 108,532
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@stunnnerv75freetelegram · 41,192
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@forexchasersofficial · 29,123
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
@FXGOAT1 · 116,349
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
@kojoforextrades · 292,057
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
@smartradenr · 33,085
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
@FXGOAT0 · 107,800
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@trustinux · 20,932
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
@TradeWithChantelTelegram · 32,503
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
@habbyforex · 297,085
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
@IAMSAIGEx · 32,865
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
@Thecoffiefxlll · 37,330
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@kira_forex · 32,027
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
@kiraforexsynth · 28,628
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
@yoforexgold · 104,783
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 August 2026
@firepipsignals · 235,143
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@alexsetandforget · 210,941
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@Kommonforextrades · 19,244
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
@rickfxcommunity · 19,272
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 October 2026
@KingFtpForex · 46,105
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
@techforexofficiall · 32,829
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENTRY HUNTERS” (@entry_hunterss), 522 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/entry_hunterss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.