
Channel
NDUBEST FOREX CHANNEL
@ndubestfx_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,999subscribers
-130 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001715358380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ndubestfx_channel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ndubestfx_channel |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:34 | 4,999 | -20 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:55 | 5,019 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 5,020 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 5,025 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 5,029 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:49 | 5,044 | -17 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 5,061 | -15 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 5,076 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 5,084 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 5,098 | +5 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 5,093 | -29 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 5,122 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 5,127 | -10 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 5,137 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 5,152 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 5,155 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 5,155 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 5,148 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 5,145 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 5,142 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Lowkey_Fx_Telegram_channel · 32,353
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
@stunnnerv75freetelegram · 40,889
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@kiraforexsynth · 28,442
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
@trustinux · 20,680
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
@FXGOAT0 · 114,117
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@FXGOAT1 · 123,372
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
@Kommonforextrades · 19,246
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
@rickfxcommunity · 19,177
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 October 2026
@serendipitytradeacademy · 125,737
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NDUBEST FOREX CHANNEL” (@ndubestfx_channel), 4,999 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ndubestfx_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.