£250 discount ends in a few hours, if you wanted to get in, here's all the info: https://jeafx.com/go
❤108🔥38💯24🥰7👍5👀4😱2🤩1
Signed James Edward

Channel
@therealjeafx
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,780subscribers
-309 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001847778436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @therealjeafx |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/therealjeafx |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 28,780 | -24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 28,804 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 28,810 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 28,827 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 28,830 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 28,842 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 28,848 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 28,853 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 28,865 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 28,873 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 28,890 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 28,904 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 28,917 | -26 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 28,943 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 28,961 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 28,968 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 28,981 | -19 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 29,000 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 29,016 | -18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 29,034 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,489 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,089 | 64.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1,655 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 830 | 8.75% | |
| 💯 | 245 | 2.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 137 | 1.44% | |
| 🥰 | 128 | 1.35% | |
| 👀 | 114 | 1.20% | |
| 😱 | 79 | 0.833% | |
| 🎉 | 77 | 0.811% | |
| ⚡ | 62 | 0.653% | |
| 🤩 | 55 | 0.58% | |
| 😍 | 18 | 0.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
£250 discount ends in a few hours, if you wanted to get in, here's all the info: https://jeafx.com/go
❤108🔥38💯24🥰7👍5👀4😱2🤩1
Signed James Edward
I don't do this often, as you know For the next 4 days ~ I'm running a discount on access to DTM. If you've followed along with this week's series & want to build out your dynamic narrative based system, this is your shot! You can find all the info here (& a little 'early bird' bonus) »» https://jeafx.com/go
❤110🔥44👍15🥰7❤🔥6👀6🎉4
Signed James Edward
It’s live ✅ This is the third and final video in the series Up to this point, you’ve seen why most traders stay stuck, and a different way of actually understanding what’s going on in the market. This is the part where it all comes together. In this video, I break down how you actually take that way of reading the market and turn it into something you can execute consistently. Because understanding it is one thi…
❤125🔥20❤🔥12👍10
Signed James Edward
It’s live. ✅ This is the video I’ve been building up to over the last couple of days. Watch it here: The Strategy to make you profitable in 2026 In this one, I break down the actual way I look at the market. Not a “setup”, not a list of rules, not something you copy and hope it works. A way of understanding what’s actually happening so your decisions make sense while you’re in a trade. Because if you’ve watched …
❤236🔥48👍31❤🔥13💯6👀1
Signed James Edward
It’s live. ✅ I’ve just dropped the first video in this weeks transformative series. This one is important because it sets the foundation for everything else. I break down why most traders stay stuck in that cycle of: win a bit → lose more → question everything → repeat …and more importantly, what’s actually causing it. Because it’s usually not what people think. If you’ve ever felt like: ❌ Your strategy should …
❤207🔥60👍36❤🔥16💯15🤩2⚡1
Signed James Edward
There’s a pattern I keep seeing over and over again with traders. And it’s not what most people think. Everyone assumes the reason they’re not making money is because their strategy isn’t good enough… or they just haven’t found the “right” one yet. But honestly, most of the time that’s not the real issue. The real issue is they don’t actually trust what they’re doing. So what happens? They hesitate on trades that…
❤259🔥41👍39💯13⚡9
Signed James Edward
Quick heads up... Starting Monday, I’m dropping a short series breaking down how to actually approach trading in a way that makes sense. Not surface-level stuff. The actual thinking process behind finding and executing trades properly. If you’ve ever felt like you’re just piecing things together and hoping it works… you’ll want to watch this. I’ll send the first one out on Monday. Just keep an eye out for it.
❤745🔥176👍110💯39👀20😱12🥰9🎉8
Signed James Edward
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlfK7_RkF3E
❤243🔥68👍41👀17💯9⚡1
Signed James Edward
Hello It's been a while. I hope you had a good Christmas & New Year break. And I hope the start of 2026 has been kind to you, if you've traded yet. I'm back with some good news. I haven't posted on YouTube for 80-something days, some people have asked me if I'm dead (lol). Fortunately, I'm not - and I'm back with something you're probably going to love. This year I'm going to be dropping a full technical bootc…
❤847🔥219👍115🎉25❤🔥23💯18👀13🥰12
Signed James Edward
Here's a breakdown of this week's trades You can see how I find my setups using my 'boring' dynamic trading strategy - to so far hit 18.19% over the past 7 weeks with a 100% win rate Vid will be back on YouTube soon, but for now here it is! 🔥
❤556🔥148👍74🥰18🎉12🤩9⚡7👀7
Signed James Edward
Video, posted without a caption
❤331🔥92👍42😱25❤🔥21👀19💯15⚡8
Signed James Edward
Not Every Structure Shift is a reversal... Sometimes it's a liquidity sweep Here's how to differentiate between the two & turn sweeps into great trades (instead of losses) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqO9C819SgI
❤332🔥65👍41❤🔥18💯17🥰8⚡6🎉5
Signed James Edward
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @therealjeafx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JeaFx” (@therealjeafx), 28,780 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/therealjeafx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.