Channel
@esxaton
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,053subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001300626212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @esxaton |
| Description | Царство священного ужаса. Хроники цифрового пепла. Прислать нюдсы и просто поболтать: @esxat_bot или сообщения канала Поддержать шершавой монеткой: boosty.to/esxaton/donate |
| Created | 11 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/esxaton |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:58 | 9,053 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 9,057 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 9,061 | +9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 9,052 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:29 | 9,054 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 9,052 | +13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 9,039 | +6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 9,033 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 9,034 | -5 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 10:21 | 9,039 | +8 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 9,031 | +3 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 9,028 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 9,036 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 9,050 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 9,054 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:07 | 9,056 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 9,061 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 9,063 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 9,056 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 9,054 | first reading |
48 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (5 May 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 64,290 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
И о крестовом походе против пиццы. Историческая справка сообщает, что прообразы пиццы существовали ещё у греков и римлян. Добавление чеснока и оливок к хлебу облагораживало жизнь античного человека. Пиццу ели древние легионеры. Пиццу ели балканские славяне. Само слово «пицца» родилось на территории Византийской империи. Византийской! То есть сначала эти защитники традиций своими ртами говорят что-то про третий Рим, …
По кротовой норе конспирологических ссылок добрался до истинной земли легенд, которая должна венчать современную мифологию инцелов. Конечно, это никакая не Гиперборея. Настоящая колыбель инцелибата — Лемурия в трактовке Рериха и Блаватской. Пятиметровые лемурийцы обладали двумя глазами спереди и одним глазом на затылке. Чувство эго у лемурийцев изначально было малоразвито, но при этом они общались посредством телепа…
Как мы знаем, торговый город-государство Угарит был разрушен несколько тысяч лет назад в результате бронзового коллапса. С тех самых пор в мире никто по-настоящему не угарал. И это большая историческая трагедия.
Что касается коммерческого праздника страшных сказок, который год уже превращаемого в хонтологическое изъятое. Мировоззрение готики вторгается в наш мир каждый день. Отказавшийся от ангелов и демонов человек современности регулярно общается с корпоративными духами посредством кремниевых реликвариев. Эхо великих катастроф проносится мимо его окон. Призраки ностальгии манят за собой в бледный мир, наскоро собранный из…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Доппельгангер философских айсбергов, редакция первая.
Религиозные авторы создали особую форму письма, которую можно назвать текстами восторга. Свои тексты восторга писали Августин, Тереза Авильская, Николай Кузанский. Они ткали произведения из молитвы, из переложения личного опыта на языки неофитов и бесконечного самоумаления. Что выделяет тексты восторга из прочих? Прежде всего — образ письма, совершающий преображение автора внутри созданного им текстового тела. Любой…
С покойным Кашпировским наверняка всё очень непросто. Не знаю, из какого карманного измерения телеевангелистов посчастливилось выбраться этому персонажу, однако вызванная им коллективная одержимость точно не могла пройти бесследно. Бьющиеся головой об стены люди, массовые припадки, терапия экрана и серии энергетического вампиризма — такие ритуалы выхода диких сил не забываются. Особенно если оные ритуалы проводятся …
А прикиньте... вот бы каждый момент времени уже был зафиксирован относительно другого момента времени... и все эти моменты воспроизводились бы один за другим... и каждый твой поступок был бы предопределён вне зависимости от дальнейших действий... и тебе пришлось бы проживать все радости, горести и неудачи... снова и снова... а вместо возможности выбирать себя существовала бы лишь неразрывная сеть деяний и последствий…
Женская тяга к курению — это подсознательное желание женщины держать зубами патроны, снаряжая трофейную винтовку с очень личным прозвищем, пока остатки сопротивления стекаются в городские руины и готовятся дать последний бой, но надежды выжить практически не осталось, ибо Европа сожжена зелёным огнём, вокруг свирепствуют мутанты и инсектоиды, гибельный ветер свежует всех ушедших за третий километр, с неба падают печа…
Костюм из вощёной холстины ✅ Крутые сапоги и готическая шляпа ✅ Кожаные перчатки ✅ Ароматные травы в клюве маски ✅ Чеснок для жевания ✅ Ковчежец с целебными пиявками ✅ Факел ✅ Медицинские лягушки ✅ Кинжал для отворения крови ✅ Трость в древнеегипетском стиле ✅ Томик Боккаччо ✅ Гамельнская флейта ✅
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @esxaton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ложь постмодерна” (@esxaton), 9,053 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esxaton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.