Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДНОвости

Channel

ДНОвости

@dnovos

On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,244subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001278542196
TypeChannel
Username@dnovos
DescriptionДля связи @PaulDnovos
Created10 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dnovos

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,23810,33510,286.56 August 2026 — 10,281 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,278 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,281 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,274 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,273 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,279 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,280 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,270 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,263 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,264 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,258 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,265 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,263 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,262 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,295 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,300 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,307 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,316 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,314 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,313 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,314 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,312 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,309 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,300 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,312 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,326 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,328 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,329 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,331 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,335 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,328 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,299 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,314 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,305 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,306 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,301 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,300 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,293 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,294 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,292 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,274 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,266 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,259 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,256 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,257 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,256 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,257 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,256 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,254 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,253 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,249 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,242 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,241 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,238 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,240 subscribers11 November 2026 — 10,244 subscribers10,2446 August 202611 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 97 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,223–10,350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:1010,244+4
9 Nov 2026, 14:5910,240+2
7 Nov 2026, 04:4710,238-3
6 Nov 2026, 01:1710,241-1
4 Nov 2026, 00:4910,242-7
1 Nov 2026, 20:4910,249-4
31 Oct 2026, 23:1610,253-1
30 Oct 2026, 21:4610,254-2
29 Oct 2026, 20:4410,256-1
28 Oct 2026, 00:1810,257+1
27 Oct 2026, 03:2810,256-1
26 Oct 2026, 06:2910,257+1
25 Oct 2026, 03:4810,256-3
24 Oct 2026, 02:2010,259-7
23 Oct 2026, 00:2810,266-8
21 Oct 2026, 21:2810,274-18
20 Oct 2026, 17:0010,292-2
19 Oct 2026, 16:4810,294+1
18 Oct 2026, 16:2910,293-7
16 Oct 2026, 16:1610,300first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.3%
avg views ÷ 10,244 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,590
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held70 (30 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total158,160
Reactions total7,237
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈701
Videos
≈222
Links
≈1,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 16s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

23,587 reactions across 70 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣7,72032.7%
💯5,56323.6%
🤡4,23918.0%
👍2,45110.4%
❤8963.80%
😁8713.69%
🔥3571.51%
👏3311.40%
🤮2961.25%
😢2210.937%
💩2150.912%
👎640.271%
✍450.191%
😡440.187%
🏆420.178%
🥰400.17%
😐260.11%
🤝250.106%
💅190.081%
👀170.072%
18 further kinds1050.445%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,587 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 70 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dnovos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (66.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 01:59 UTC≈4,310 views280 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Не плохой ответ на летающую Теслу Илона Маска, конечно: на скорости 60 км/ч этот УАЗ видимо вибрирует так, что колеса теряют сцепление с асфальтом и автомобиль буквально парит над несносной тягостью дорожного бытия. К тому же на нем, думаю, можно взять Берлин даже не выезжая из гаража в Сызрани - просто надышавшись в салоне испарениями бензола.

🤣227👍18🔥13😁6🤡5☃3💋3❤2

4 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC≈7,510 views685 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

⬆️⬆️⬆️ Ну и на почве сформировавшегося комплекса неполноценности неминуемо пробуждается Его Величество нарциссизм. Отверженному нарциссу (в данном случае коллективному) жизненно необходимо быть пупом земли, откуда и берется иррациональная, почти комичная уверенность, что «весь мир вращается вокруг нас», а жители Берлина или Рима карбонару под болоньезе кушать не могут без мыслей о ней самой - Великой России. Мысль о …

🤡337💯255👍50👏20🤣10❤8💩1🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC≈7,200 views592 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Истинное западопоклонничество в России парадоксальным образом ярче всего проявляется не у либералов, а у ватников, для которых одобрение со стороны Запада остается высшей ментальной санкцией и главным источником легитимности. Несмотря на грозные лозунги об «особом пути» и решительно направленный в сторону Брюсселя пролетарский кулак, вся картина мира ультра-патриотов, как и сто лет назад, остается безнадежно западно…

🤡323💯204👍26🤣14❤13👏4🔥3🤩3

4 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC≈4,430 views258 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @jesuisravchanPhoto

Это очень смешно. Зетные медиа убеждают свою аудиторию, что Европа за них. Вот прям европейцам делать нехуй, для них главная тема это что в Киеве что-то происходит. Откуда эта уверенность, что весь мир вращается вокруг вас? Что людям не плевать на Украину и Россию? И что западные СМИ если что-то и пишут, то пишут какая Украина плохая, а не Россия? И откуда это желание чтобы западные СМИ были на вашей стороне? Какой…

👍118💯105🤣18❤7👏3🔥3🤡3💩1

3 Nov 2026, 13:40 UTC≈5,260 views589 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Невзоров возмущен тем, что в России молодежь красится на хеллоуин, когда война идет. Подобные укоры в самом начале имели смысл, но сейчас, на пятый год войны, для всех это стало рутиной. Объективно сегодня никто и ни на что в России повлиять не способен, все, поезд ушел. По этой логике, мы, очевидно, теперь обязаны погрузиться в перманентный траур до скончания веков? Изгнать из сердец малейший намек на радость, объяв…

💯325🤡155👍52❤17🤝16👏11😐9👎2

3 Nov 2026, 13:39 UTC≈4,140 views94 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @nevzorovtvPhoto

Москва и Краснодар. Веселье. Примерно в это же время россия бомбила Украину. Гибли мирные украинцы. Дети сидели в бомбоубежищах. Нет света, тепла. Сражались и гибли защитники Украины. Дохли и орки в окопах. Но молодому поколению россиян кажется, что это далеко. @nevzorovtv

😡44😁16🤡8🤝7😢6😐4❤3💯2

2 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC≈6,410 views429 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

⬆️⬆️⬆️ В этом плане гордыня Русского Мира не давшего миру ничего кроме лаптей и ГУЛАГов, но спиздившего у этого мира все, что возможно было спиздить, выглядит максимально жалко. Как зависть какая-то. Классическая ситуация - когда не можешь с чем-то конкурировать - запрети это! Поскольку западная цивилизация более развита, она и праздники придумывает куда более интересные, яркие, красочные. И каждый, кто достигает оп…

💯277👍69❤28🤣19🔥13🤡9👏7😁3

2 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC≈4,570 views297 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⬆️⬆️⬆️ Сам помню, с братом в детстве на участок к дяде Ване полезли за конфетами, а он увидел и поленом нас охуячил, решив, что мы пришли пиздить медный кабель из его сарая. Впрочем, если честно, мы за этим к нему и пришли, ибо кроме кабеля у пенсионеров 90-х поживиться было нечем. Примечательно и то, что упоминаний Святок в классике русской литературы практически не существует, что в полной мере говорит о широте ра…

🤣136👍78💯47❤17👏7🤡7🔥5

2 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC≈4,680 views244 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⬆️⬆️⬆️ Для России даже Новый Год - это не традиция, а совершенно новое и полностью заимствованное явление. В России таких праздненств сформироваться по определению не могло по той же причине: на украшение елки и подарки нужны деньги. Откуда взяться деньгам у крестьян из книг Некрасова с Радищевым? Новый Год привез Петр Первый, подглядев его в Голландии, сама же елка на Руси появилась лишь в середине 19 века. Ни Пушки…

👍142💯49❤22👏9🤣9🔥6🤡5✍1

2 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC≈5,210 views360 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Разбудите меня через сто лет и спросите, чем занимается российская поцреотня под конец октября, я отвечу "Воюют с хеллоуином". Мне то похуй, сам я даже ДР не праздную, но если посмотреть на мир глазами ребенка, то станет понятно притягивающее очарование как этого, так и многих других западных праздников. Все эти тыквы со свечами, приведения, конфетные ритуалы — для ребенка непередаваемые по крутости ощущения. Однако …

🤣224👍62💯31❤25🔥8🤡8🎃2

28 Oct 2026, 13:16 UTC≈7,760 views172 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⬆️⬆️⬆️ Упоминаемый в тексте Ваха – обычный молодой человек, который при проверке регистрации (или что там в СССР было принято проверять) достал нож, как очевидно, чтобы нарезать знаменитую Советскую колбасу по 2.20. Ту самую, секрет мифического вкуса которой СССР, по заверениям ностальгирующих старожилов, унес с собой в могилу вместе с чертежами космических кораблей и пророчествами о скорой гибели НАТО. Милиционер же…

👍118❤18🔥14🤡9✍5👀2👏2😁2

28 Oct 2026, 13:16 UTC≈6,510 views138 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В начале 1980-х годов Московское руководство, полистав свежие отчеты о весьма специфических нравах, царящих в Чечено-Ингушетии, взмахнула руками и изобразила на лице крайнюю степень цивилизованного изумления. В рамках спешной культурной эвакуации Кремль решил приобщить кавказскую молодежь к светлому, доброму, вечному, щедро отсыпав республике целевые квоты в лучшие вузы РСФСР — этакий советский аналог американской af…

👍93❤18✍11🔥8😁4🤡3🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @dnovos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @dnovos as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ДОКИНЗ
@dokinz · 19,578
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДНОвости” (@dnovos), 10,244 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnovos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.