Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for politics.jpg

Channel

politics.jpg

@politicsjpg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

390subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002238661077
TypeChannel
Username@politicsjpg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 29 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/politicsjpg

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

390397393.57 August 2026 — 397 subscribers8 August 2026 — 397 subscribers14 August 2026 — 395 subscribers22 August 2026 — 393 subscribers30 August 2026 — 391 subscribers16 September 2026 — 390 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 389–398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 15:41390-1
30 Aug 2026, 10:24391-2
22 Aug 2026, 16:32393-2
14 Aug 2026, 08:28395-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:50397no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:50397first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 29 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5548.2%
❤‍🔥2824.6%
👍1614.0%
😁54.39%
⚡32.63%
🔥32.63%
🤮21.75%
😐10.877%
🤩10.877%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2024 to 1 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2024, 06:06 UTC≈1,490 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @politicspngPhoto

Просыпаюсь, а телеграм решил вернуть мне мой канал 🌝✨ Для тех, кто всё пропустил: в июле я потерял доступ к своему аккаунту, и каналам, которые админил поддержка тг мне не отвечала и в августе я завел канал politics.jpg c нового аккаунта когда на новом канале собралось почти 500 человек, Дуров такой — ладно давайте вернём ему канал --- Новые посты будут выходить здесь, а над судьбой politics.jpg подумаю ещё, мо…

❤22⚡3

30 Sept 2024, 11:48 UTC≈1,510 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ну захожу на первую попавшуюся трансляцию марша за палестину во франции и че-то не вижу тех персонажей, которыми пугает что бомж, что праваки, что наши патриоты. короче у меня нет простого ответа, почему леваки проигрывают. но у них явно проблемы с тем, как продвигать свои позиции по экономике, палестине, украине. буду рад, если вы подскажите что да как, скинете ссылки на умные статьи и подкасты.

👍11❤4🔥1😐1

30 Sept 2024, 11:48 UTC≈1,130 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Простой ответ на этот вопрос даёт бомж в Париже, сравнивая митинги двух сторон и говоря, что у правых это адекватные люди, а левые — фрики. И пусть эта логика попахивает фобией к трансам, геям, феминисткам и т. д. и т. п. Но может так действительно думает средний француз/немец/австриец? (спойлер: вряд ли)

❤6😁5👍2

30 Sept 2024, 11:25 UTC≈1,030 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера ультраправые победили на выборах в Национальный совет Австрии. Мне как дизайнеру, конечно, хочется найти подсказки в графике, почему так? Но визуально ни ультраправые, ни правые центристы, ни соц. демократы не отличаются — везде это мужик средних лет в пиджаке с лозунгом «за всё хорошее, выбирай нас».

❤18🤮2👍1

29 Sept 2024, 09:26 UTC870 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

приятно удивился, узнав, что картье-брессон был анархистом

❤‍🔥7

29 Sept 2024, 09:26 UTC882 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anarchist_cult_reviewPhoto

Существует два основных подхода к исследованию и интерпретации творчества выдающегося французского фотографа Анри Картье-Брессона (1908 – 2004). Первый, условно называемый «американским», заключается в подчеркивании эстетического совершенства созданных Анри снимков: композиционной оригинальности и фигуративной сложности. Второй подход родом из Франции. На родине художника о нем чаще всего говорят, как о фотожурналист…

❤‍🔥12❤4👍2🔥2

29 Sept 2024, 08:43 UTC978 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @four_to_three_twoPhoto

Чтобы научиться отстаивать свои права, надо знать, как это делают другие! 🤝 Теперь каждую неделю мы будем приносить вам новости о рабочем движении по всему миру. Ставьте пламенных сердец, если вам нравится такой формат ❤️‍🔥

❤‍🔥9❤1🤩1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @politicsjpg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“politics.jpg” (@politicsjpg), 390 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politicsjpg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.