Channel
@jadidtarinha3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20,347subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001238360858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jadidtarinha3 |
| Description | 🔹پست های روزانه کانال: #دلنوشته_امروز #پزشکی #عکس_روز #شعر_روز #خبرهای_روز #کتاب_روز 🔹جدید ترین ها برای تو ! ارتباط با ما + تبلیغات: @Hamid_Reza_Abravan کانال دوم ما: https://t.me/Hamidrezaabravan 🔹لینک گروه: https://t.me/+cUty_4FLZ-w2Y2I8 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jadidtarinha3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 20,347 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 20,348 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 20,358 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 20,370 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 20,369 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 20,383 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 20,405 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 20,416 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:40 | 20,404 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 20,406 | first reading |
67 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (30 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,518 |
| Reactions total | 154 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
133 reactions across 48 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 72.2% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 16.5% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.76% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.26% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.752% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#خبر_روز 📰مهمترین خبرهای ۲۳ مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۵ 🆕وزیر خزانهداری آمریکا از آغاز یک کمپین فشار حداکثری علیه ایران خبر داد 🔹وی اعلام کرد که هدف این کمپین، حسابهای بانکی و ارزهای دیجیتال ایران در سراسر جهان است. 🆕 جروزالم پست: ایران تا ۲۰۲۷ ذخایر موشکیاش را احیا میکند 🔹جروزالم پست میگوید اگر ایران تولید ماهانه ۱۰۰ تا ۳۰۰ موشک بالستیک را از سر بگیرد، میتواند ذخایر پیش از جنگ ۱۲روزه را بازسازی کند. 🆕منبع دولتی: افزایش…
#شعرـروز صدایت بوی تازهُ آب بود وقتی به گلدان عطشزده میرسید دستت سایهسار کلید بر قفل فراموش شده بود پاهایت به فرش نَفَس میبخشید نامت عطر خوشِ پیش از طلوع در ساحل بود و مگر قلب، چقدر گنجایش داشت... از پوست و پیرهنم بیرون ریختی و سراسر راه فقط با تو سخن میگفتم #شمس_لنگرودی @jadidtarinha3
❤1
#عکس_روز 📸رم، ایتالیا Colosseum, Rome 💢جدید ترین ها: ➡️ @jadidtarinha3
❤1
#دلنوشته-امروز بعضی فصلهای زندگی، برای شکوفه دادن نیست؛ برای ریشه دووندنه. از بیرون شاید چیزی دیده نشه، اما از درون داری رشد میکنی... @jadidtarinha3
❤3
#پزشکی 🔹کبد چرب؛ شایعترین بیماری کبدی جهان ◽️تشخیص ابتلا به کبد چرب با انجام یک سونوگرافی ساده امکانپذیر است. افرادی که به این بیماری مبتلا میشوند، باید توجه داشته باشند که تنها میزان درجات بیماری مهم نیست، بلکه خود ابتلا به کبد چرب نیز حائز اهمیت است. 💢 تازه های پزشکی/جدیدترین ها: ➡️@jadidtarinha3
❤3
📕 در خانواده من همه آدم کشتهاند ✍نویسنده: بنجامین استیونسن 🔹قسمت ۶ از ۱۰ @jadidtarinha3
❤2
#کتاب_روز 📕 در خانواده من همه آدم کشتهاند ✍نویسنده: بنجامین استیونسن 🎙پیمان سلیمی 🔹دسته بندی: رمان ◾️درباره کتاب: مراقب باشید! اگر در مهمانی خانوادگی کانینگهام به شوخیهای شوهرعمهتان نخندید، ممکن است به لیست طویل قربانیان این خانواده بپیوندید! بنجامین استیونسن در خانواده من همه آدم کشتهاند که برندهی جایزهی کتاب جنایی سال مجلهی ساندی تایمز شده است، داستان خانوادهای را تعریف میکند که همگی از یک مشکل موروثی …
❤1
#عکس_روز 📸نمای زیبا از خانه طباطبایی ها 🔹خانه طباطباییها یکی از خانههای تاریخی و زیبای شهر کاشان است که در محله «سلطان امیر احمد» احداث شده است. این خانهی زیبا به عروس خانههای ایران معروف است. 💢جدید ترین ها: ➡️ @jadidtarinha3
❤2
#شعر_روز میوه لبهای تودر زیر باران چیدنی است چشم تو کهنه شرابی تا ابد نوشیدنی است وقتی می خندی به جان شعرم آتش میزنی جان چشمانت قسم با تو دلم بوییدنی است می بری تا ناکجا آباد آغوشت مرا خوب می دانی در آغوشت غزل روییدنی است طرح اندامت قصیده چشمهای تو غزل پایتخت شعرمی با تو جنونم دیدنی است ابر باران زای من!بی وقفه بر روحم ببار آسمان من فقط در فصل تو باریدنی است مثنوی در مثنوی درگیر چشمان توام شعر من با تو فقط با …
❤2🥰1
#پزشکی 🔹مثل مردم ژاپن آب بنوشید تا عمرتان طولانی شود ! بسیاری از مردم ژاپن بیش از صد سال زندگی میکنند، چون بعد از بیدار شدن ۲ لیوان آب مینوشند، نکته مهم این است که آبی که ناشتا مینوشید به هیچ عنوان نباید آب سرد باشد و بهترین دمای آب در این زمان ولرم است. 💢تازه های پزشکی/جدید ترین ها: ➡️ @jadidtarinha3
❤3
#دلنوشته_امروز کاش میﺷﺪ ﯾﮏ صبح، ﮐﺴﯽ ﺯﻧﮓ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﯾﺪ: ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ِﭘـُر ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍم.. ﺑﺎ ﻟﺒﺨﻨﺪ.. ﺑﺎ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺁﮐﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻫﺎﯼ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﯽ.. ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﯼ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ها ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﻡ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﺮﻭﻡ..! "سید علی صالحی " @jadidtarinha3
❤3
📕 در خانواده من همه آدم کشتهاند ✍نویسنده: بنجامین استیونسن 🔹قسمت ۵ از ۱۰ @jadidtarinha3
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @jadidtarinha3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 589,894 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jadidtarinha3 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جدید ترین ها🌱” (@jadidtarinha3), 20,347 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jadidtarinha3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.