🔥 شیرینی من به شما عزیزانم 💰 از الان تا فردا لینک کانال ( VIP ) را فقط برای 150 نفر رایگان کردیم بعد از اون هزینه عضویت ماهانه 100 دلار هست https://t.me/+Vu415WGV7DozOWVl https://t.me/+Vu415WGV7DozOWVl ✅ ولی اینو بگم شرعا راضی نیستم جایی بفرستید ، این لینک فقط مخصوص اعضای این کاناله لطفا رعایت کنید تا حق خودتون ضایع نشه 👍

Channel
💸 مغز ثروت ساز 💸 دکتر مهدی خیرالهی
@mmovafaghiatt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,626subscribers
-177 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001260951098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mmovafaghiatt |
| Description | ادمین تهیه دوره ها @miladsh1992 تبلیغات 👇👇 https://t.me/joinchat/THmc7dAKbfMX4kAO |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mmovafaghiatt |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:29 | 9,626 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:24 | 9,630 | -23 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 9,653 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:04 | 9,656 | -16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 9,672 | -13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 9,685 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 9,696 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 9,701 | -21 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 9,722 | -40 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 9,762 | -47 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 9,809 | +153 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 9,656 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 9,665 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 9,669 | -30 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 9,699 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 9,698 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 9,718 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 9,729 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 9,737 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 9,751 | first reading |
Engagement
196 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.60%
- avg views ÷ 9,626 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 154
- 54 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.89%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 54
- of 196 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 196 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,318 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 01:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,610
- Videos
- ≈1,350
- Links
- ≈4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 57m 24s
- Average length
- 1m 08s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 70.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 196 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
عصر متافیزیک دوره هیپنوتیزم فروش
دوره هیپنوتیزم فروش
🔸پرسش از شما | پاسخ از سید محمد عرشیانفر ❓چطور با مرگ عزیزانم کنار بیام؟ ❓چرا به دنیا میآییم، وقتی میدانیم روزی از این دنیا میرویم؟
🔹️چرا اکثر مردم هیچوقت به خواستههاشون نمیرسن؟ 🔹️مدل صحیح درخواست از کائنات چیه؟ ✅ پاسخ سؤالات بالا را در این فایل صوتی بشنوید.
آمادهاید امروز یک تصمیم تازه بگیریم؟ 🤝 تصمیمی که کمکمون کنه خلاقترعمل کنیم، کیفیت کارهامون رو بالاتر ببریم و با انگیزه و استمرار بیشتری به سمت اهدافمون حرکت کنیم. ✨ 🌱
🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 خوشگله؟😍 🍀🍀🍀🍀 باور فراوانی #فراوانی
❤3
امروز، روزی تازه از لطف پروردگار است... از خدا برایتان دلی آرام، نگاهی پر از امید و ایمانی استوار آرزو میکنم؛چرا که با امید به خدای مهربان، هیچ سختیای ماندگار نیست... به خدا توکل کنید؛ زیباترین اتفاقها، گاهی پس از سختترین روزها رقم میخورند.... روزتان سرشار از نور و برکت الهی .
⚠️آیا خدا برای رزق و روزی انسان، تاس میاندازه؟ چرا بعضیها هر روز ثروتمندتر میشن و بعضیها با وجود تلاش زیاد، هنوز به درآمد دلخواهشون نمیرسن؟🤔 چون ثروت، شانسی نیست و قانون داره.✅ در دوره رایگان «قوانین الهی ثروت» با قوانینی آشنا میشی که نگاهت به رزق و ثروت رو برای همیشه تغییر میده.⭐ همین الان بزن روی لینک زیر و دوره رو شروع کن👇 @mahdikardan_servat @mahdikardan_servat @mahdikardan_servat
عصر متافیزیک 💰 هزینه دوره هیپنوتیزم فروش 4 میلیون با تخفیف 💰 پشتیبانی تهیه دوره👇 @Pshtibban
🌔«هرگز نترس از اینکه آیندهای که نامعلوم است را به خدایی که آشناست، بسپاری…» #کری_تن در سکوت برای لحظاتی به تنفس خود آگاهی پیدا کنید و با دم و بازدم های حیات بخش به نور درون خویش متصل شوید، پس با عشق و آگاهی با خود تکرار کنید: ⚜️سپاسگزارم ⚜️آرامش من ،دوستت دارم
❤1👍1
🔰🔰نتایج کارگاه هیپنوتیزم فروش
Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @mmovafaghiatt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 22 posts on @mmovafaghiatt as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 38 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 8
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Aarsheee · 5,6731 post𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑘
@Asheghanbook · 13,4601 postبنیانِ آرامش
@bonyanearamesh70 · 1,7791 postBook 📖
@book_pdff · 23,3651 postفرهنگ جاوید
@farhangejavid_pub · 1,9941 postمرجع فیلم های انگیزشی
@Film_Aangizeshi · 1821 postهاشور//
@hashurr · 8,5611 postکتاب نایاب
@ketabnayyab · 89,7301 postدوره رایگان «قوانین الهی ثروت»
@mahdikardan_servat · 1,8891 postمزدافر مؤمنی
@mazdafarr · 4,3791 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Yahooo_Daroon · 24,829
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 September 2026
@agahiazadi0 · 32,032
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
@moovafaghiat2017 · 37,762
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
@mojezetaqirebavar · 34,234
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
@jazbomoraghebe · 36,979
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
@parisanasri · 123,280
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
@abasmanesh · 37,015
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
@jadidtarinha3 · 19,889
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 28 September 2026
@hamisherahii · 63,768
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@Sahahrtaraneh · 42,298
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💸 مغز ثروت ساز 💸 دکتر مهدی خیرالهی” (@mmovafaghiatt), 9,626 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmovafaghiatt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.