Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تاجیکستان شناسی

@irtaj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,762subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001944602
TypeChannel
Username@irtaj
Created12 November 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/irtaj

Growth

3,7603,7623,7615 August 2026 — 3,761 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,760 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,760 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,762 subscribers5 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,760–3,762 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 13:223,762+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:323,760no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:203,760-1
5 Aug 2026, 21:093,761first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 3,762 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 December 20252 August 2026)
Views total3,293
Reactions total65
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 48s
Average length
3m 48s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

531 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40576.3%
👍5810.9%
🤮275.08%
👏173.20%
👎81.51%
🔥61.13%
🤬40.753%
🤔20.377%
🥰20.377%
😁10.188%
🤯10.188%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 531reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC≈1,230 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

جوره جان نسخه صوتی @irtaj

11

2 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC≈1,340 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

جوره جان - نگینه امانقلوا @irtaj

13👍1

1 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC723 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ghotbeelmiferdowsiVideo

🔸🔸شعرخوانی دختر تاجیک برای ایران https://t.me/ghotbeelmiferdowsi

39👏1

5 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,910 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دانشگاه ملی تاجیکستان دانشکدۀ فیلولوژی گروه تاریخ ادبیات تاجیک فراخوان مقاله کنفرانس بین‌المللی علمی ـ نظری «شاهنامه فردوسی و جایگاه آن در گسترۀ شعر و ادب فارسی تاجیکی» کافدرای (گروه) تاریخ ادبیات تاجیک فاکولتۀ (دانشکده) فیلولوژی دانشگاه ملی تاجیکستان شما را برای اشتراک در کار کنفرانس بین‌المللی علمی-نظری در موضوع ««شاهنامه» فردوسی و جایگاه آن در گسترۀ شعر و ادب فارسی تاجیکی» دعوت می‌نماید. در کنفرانس مسئله‌های زی

14🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,320 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

به مناسبت روز دیپلماسی فرهنگی و تعامل با جهان میراث مکتوب و دیپلماسی فرهنگی سخنان جناب آقای دکتر علی‌اشرف مجتهد شبستری رئیس انجمن دوستی ایران و تاجیستان مؤسسهٔ پژوهشی میراث مکتوب – چهارشنبه ۱۰ تیرماه ۱۴۰۵ @mirasmaktoob @irtaj

13🤬1

5 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC≈1,290 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bonyadeferdowsitousPhoto

#گزیده‌روزنامه‌ها 🟩آشتی دوباره تاجیکستان با خط فارسی 🟨روزنامه #خراسان 🟪در کفتگو با #دکتر_ناهید_یوسف‌زاده 🆔https://sarasari.khorasanonlin.ir/?nid=22083&pid=9&type=0 💠#كانون_شاهنامه_فردوسي_توس 💠#بنیاد_فردوسی_توس ‏ 🆔 http://bonyadferdowsitous.ir/ 🆔https://t.me/bonyadeferdowsitous 🆔https://www.instagram.com/bonyadeferdowsitous 🆔https://x.com/bonyadferdowsi/ 🆔https://www.aparat.com/BonyadeFerdowsiMashad 🆔https

16👎2👏2

5 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,190 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

گزارش تلویزیون دولتی تاجیکستان از سفر امام علی رحمان، به ایران برای شرکت در مراسم تشییع رهبر پیشین @irtaj

🤮1612👍5👎3

1 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,360 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kheradsarayeferdowsiVideo

سخنرانی دکتر محمدجعفر یاحقی، مدیر مؤسسهٔ خردسرای فردوسی، عضو پیوستهٔ فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی ایران از دو اقدام رئیس‌جمهور تاجیکستان دربارهٔ توزیع رایگان شاهنامهٔ فردوسی به مردم این کشور و تقویت آموزش الفبای نیاکان «خط نیاکان و فردوسی، میراث مشترک ماست و دو پنجرهٔ مهم برای ایجاد ارتباط میان تاجیکستان و ایران و پیوند با جهان است.» در همایش بین‌المللی «نقش جوره بیک نظری در رشد علم و فرهنگ تاجیک» کتابخانهٔ ملی تاجیک

10

28 Jun 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,690 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📌از سوی دفتر ادبیات و زبان فارسی؛ فراخوان شعر «قند مکرر» منتشر شد فراخوان شعر «قند مکرّر» در دو بخش «شعر بزرگسال» و «شعر کودک و نوجوان» منتشر شد. موضوعات: ▪️زبان فارسی و همبستگی ملّی ▪️پاسداشت زبان فارسی ▪️ظرفیت‌ها و ظرافت‌های زبان فارسی ▪️زبان فارسی در گستره تاریخی ✨بخش ویژه: شعر طنز با محوریت ترویج «درست‌نویسی» ⏳فرصت ارسال آثار: ۲۴ مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۵ ارسال اشعار: از طریق شناسه تلگرام و بله: @Qandemokarrar *متن

14

23 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTC≈2,240 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ایجاد فرهنگستان مشترک ایران و تاجیکستان؛ فرصتی برای اتحاد نظام‌مند 👤 حسن قریبی، عضو پیوسته انجمن دوستی ایران و تاجیکستان و رئیس سابق پژوهشگاه زبان فارسی در تاجیکستان، درباره ظرفیت‌های پیوند بیشتر ایران و تاجیکستان گفت: 🔹ایجاد فرهنگستان مشترک ایران و تاجیکستان از فرصت‌هایی است که نباید رها شود؛ باید توجه به زبان فارسی و خط فارسی نظام‌مند شود. 🔹تلاش‌های فردی باید تبدیل به یک مکتب شود. مرحوم لایق شیرعلی از شاعران معاصر

21👍7🔥2

18 Jun 2026, 20:39 UTC≈2,380 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

زمانی غنی‌سازی صفر مطالبه می‌شد، اما اکنون حتی نیازهای هسته‌ای ایران در این سند پذیرفته شده است. زمانی توقف حمایت ایران از متحدان منطقوی خواسته می‌شد، اما اکنون حزب‌الله لبنان به عنوان متحد ایران در چارچوب این یادداشت تفاهم مورد اشاره قرار گرفته است. به همین دلیل می‌توان گفت که این یادداشت تفاهم، در صورت اجرای مفاد آن، یک موفقیت مهم برای ایران و نشانه‌ای از عقب‌نشینی بزرگ امریکا محسوب می‌شود. با این همه، ساده‌لوحان

23🤮8👍3🤬3🤔2

18 Jun 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,980 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

نگاهی به یادداشت تفاهم اسلام‌آباد به قلم رامین هادی‌زاده، تاجیکستانی و کارشناس ارشد علوم سیاسی 🔸متن فارسی و انگلیسی یادداشت تفاهم میان ایران امریکا را با دقت مطالعه کردم. طوری بسیاری‌ها تا به حال گفتند، این سند به طور قابل توجهی به سود ایران و خواسته‌های اعلامی آن تنظیم شده است. حتی بیش از برآوردهای خوش‌بینانهٔ بنده انتظار می‌رفت. امریکا و رژیم صهیونی در آغاز جنگ اهداف خود را «تغییر رژیم»، «تسلیم بی قید و شرط»، «

👍108👎2🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irtaj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 144,905 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تاجیکستان شناسی” (@irtaj), 3,762 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irtaj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.