Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال شخصی یاشار سلطانی

Channel

کانال شخصی یاشار سلطانی

@yashar_soltani

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

117,486subscribers

+746 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001419337210
TypeChannel
Username@yashar_soltani
Descriptionروزنامه‌نگار تحقیقی و مشاور رسانه ارتباط با من و ارسال گزارش @yasharsoltani_126 https://twitter.com/yasharsoltani
Created23 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yashar_soltani

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

84,500 average views per post against 117,486 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.0%. Across the 1,121 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,020–315,932 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 1.85% and 8.83%, with a median of 4.42%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,014,500
Mature posts only74.8% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers117,486 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb100000:fas · 1,121 channels · p10 0.72% · p25 1.85% · p50 4.42% · p75 8.83% · p90 16.9%
Position in cohort99.018th percentile · 16.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.041% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

116,559117,616117,087.55 August 2026 — 116,740 subscribers6 August 2026 — 116,740 subscribers6 August 2026 — 116,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 116,692 subscribers7 August 2026 — 116,665 subscribers8 August 2026 — 116,631 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116,598 subscribers11 August 2026 — 116,559 subscribers11 August 2026 — 116,661 subscribers13 August 2026 — 116,862 subscribers14 August 2026 — 116,831 subscribers16 August 2026 — 116,780 subscribers17 August 2026 — 116,976 subscribers18 August 2026 — 117,066 subscribers19 August 2026 — 117,060 subscribers20 August 2026 — 117,045 subscribers21 August 2026 — 117,087 subscribers23 August 2026 — 117,154 subscribers24 August 2026 — 117,150 subscribers25 August 2026 — 117,172 subscribers26 August 2026 — 117,203 subscribers27 August 2026 — 117,189 subscribers28 August 2026 — 117,265 subscribers29 August 2026 — 117,235 subscribers30 August 2026 — 117,216 subscribers31 August 2026 — 117,209 subscribers1 September 2026 — 117,202 subscribers2 September 2026 — 117,193 subscribers4 September 2026 — 117,161 subscribers6 September 2026 — 117,141 subscribers10 September 2026 — 117,453 subscribers12 September 2026 — 117,616 subscribers14 September 2026 — 117,560 subscribers15 September 2026 — 117,534 subscribers17 September 2026 — 117,486 subscribers117,4865 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +746. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116,400–117,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:19117,486-48
15 Sept 2026, 18:22117,534-26
14 Sept 2026, 00:56117,560-56
12 Sept 2026, 08:40117,616+163
10 Sept 2026, 03:37117,453+312
6 Sept 2026, 22:20117,141-20
4 Sept 2026, 05:56117,161-32
2 Sept 2026, 17:54117,193-9
1 Sept 2026, 18:18117,202-7
31 Aug 2026, 17:59117,209-7
30 Aug 2026, 21:32117,216-19
29 Aug 2026, 20:17117,235-30
28 Aug 2026, 19:47117,265+76
27 Aug 2026, 17:32117,189-14
26 Aug 2026, 20:32117,203+31
25 Aug 2026, 20:23117,172+22
24 Aug 2026, 20:07117,150-4
23 Aug 2026, 04:17117,154+67
21 Aug 2026, 15:05117,087+42
20 Aug 2026, 10:43117,045first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.0%
avg views ÷ 117,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
84,500
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held37 (5 May 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total1,014,500
Reactions total48,972
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 21:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
785
Videos
275
Links
231

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 22s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

145,578 reactions across 37 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍142,19997.7%
👎3,3792.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145,578 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 06:57 UTC≈48,300 views3,309 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

‏ریچارد نفیو طراح معماری تحریم ایران در کتاب «هنر تحریم» می‌نویسد: ‏«آمریکا عمداً واردات کالای لوکس را تحریم نکرد تا: ‏ ‏۱. منابع ارزی ایران سریع تر تحلیل برود. ‏۲. وجود کالای لوکس و عدم وجود کالای ضروری باعث تشدید حس تحریم‌شدگی در مردم شود.» ‏مسئولان طی چند دهه خواسته یا ناخواسته به تئوری‌های «نفیو» لبیک گفته‌اند. ‏برای مثال: ‏در حالی که در واردات واکسن انفولانزا یا داروی بیماران خاص کمبود شدید داریم؛ اما شاهد آ…

👍3,250👎59

25 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC≈58,100 views1,860 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

‏▫️صحبت‌های مهم احمدی‌مقدم درباره شلیک به توافق: ‏ بعد از توافق‌نامه، نود میلیون بشکه نفت‌مان از محاصره خارج شد اما خریداری نشد. چون ناگهان نفت زیادی عرضه شده بود، مشتری‌ها با قیمت‌های پایین می‌خواستند بخرند. با بسته شدن تنگه، همان را با قیمت بالا فروختیم. ‏احمدی‌مقدم رئیس دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی و رئیس پلیس پیشین ایران است. @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی

👎1,650👍210

24 Sept 2026, 19:17 UTC≈60,000 views5,711 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

‏پس از افشاگری درباره تراستی‌ها و رانت ۸۰ میلیون بشکه نفت به ۴ تریدر؛ یکی از #نهادی_امنیتی⁩ خواستار #بازداشت⁩ و #تحقیق⁩ از من شده است. ‏وظیفه نهاد امنیتی خشکاندن ریشه فساد است، نه عمله مفسدان شدن و دهان افشاگر را بستن! ‏فساد در هر قبیله‌ای؛ اعم از اصلاح‌طلب، اصولگرا، خاخام یا پایداری، باید بدون حب‌وبغض پیگیری شود. ‏وظیفه شما پوشاندن و پنهان کردن فساد نیست، به فکر اموال و‌ ثروت ملی باشید. ‏سوال من همچنان باقی است:…

👍5,690👎21

23 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC≈57,400 views2,767 reactionsread 26 September 2026

▫️محسنی اژه‌ای: توضیحات وزارت نفت و بانک مرکزی درباره تراستی‌ها قانع‌کننده نبود محسنی اژه‌ای، رئیس قوه قضائیه، با اشاره به موضوع «تراستی‌ها» و نحوه بازگشت ارز حاصل از صادرات، بر ضرورت تعیین تکلیف این پرونده تأکید کرد. او گفت توضیحات ارائه‌شده از سوی وزارت نفت و بانک مرکزی درباره این موضوع برایش قانع‌کننده نبوده و بر بررسی دقیق ابعاد پرونده و ادامه پیگیری‌ها برای روشن شدن موضوع تأکید کرد. رییس قوه قضاییه پرونده …

👍2,710👎57

22 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC≈78,800 views3,387 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

▫️صحبت‌های اقای دستغیب، رییس دیوان محاسبات کشور در صحن علنی مجلس که عین صحبت‌های من است. او از دست‌های پشت پرده فروش نفت می‌گوید. از مجوزهای خاص و امنیتی‌سازی فروش نفت! چرا وزارت نفت از فروش نفت می‌ترسد؟ @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی

👍3,370👎17

21 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC≈79,600 views4,652 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

‏جماعتی عادت دارند گنج را در خرابه‌ها مردم پیدا کنند. ‏سؤال من ساده بود: ‏ماجرای واگذاری ۸۰ میلیون بشکه نفت به ۴ تریدر چیست؟ این چهار نفر چگونه انتخاب شدند و خط اعتباری با چه مجوزی برایشان ایجاد شد؟ ‏اگر بنا دارید با کج‌فهمی عمدی از تعبیر «موشک به توافق»، اصل ماجرا را منحرف کنید، از فردا اسناد بیشتری منتشر می‌کنم تا سوءتفاهم‌های ساختگی‌تان کاملاً برطرف شود. #پول_نفت_کجاست؟ #نفت_دست_کیست⁩؟ ▫️لینک کامل برنامه در …

👍4,620👎32

19 Sept 2026, 20:21 UTC≈78,800 views4,397 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

▫️۱۰۰ میلیون بشکه نفت گم شده! به قرارگاه‌ها، ستاد کل، نیروی انتظامی و نیروهای مسلح چه ارتباطی دارد که نفت می‌فروشد؟ چرا متولی فروش نفت باید امنیتی‌ها و اطلاعاتی‌ها باشند؟ [ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ] @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی

👍4,350👎47

18 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC≈98,000 views4,779 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

نفت در ایران صاحب ندارد؟ ▫️محمد جواد #باوند معاون سابق اقتصادی اطلاعات سپاه الان مسئول فروش نفت شده است. او به ۴ نفر ۸۵ میلیون بشکه نفت واگذار کرد که سود ۱/۵ میلیاردی نصیب‌شان شد. یکی از آنها روح الله رضوی داماد سخنگوی پایداری‌ها که ۱۷ میلیارد دلار نفت فروخت. و دیگری پسر شمخانی که طی این سالها ۳۰ میلیارد دلار نفت فروخته است. ▫️درباره بایندریان و مومنین هم بعدا می‌نویسم. [ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ] @yashar_soltan…

👍4,750👎29

18 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC≈88,700 views4,530 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

مصدق صنعت نفت را ملی کرد؛ اما همان نفت الان دست چند جوجه‌اطلاعاتی و امنیتی افتاده است. کارگروه نفت شورای عالی امنیت ملی چرا و چگونه تشکیل شد؟ اعضا بی‌مسئولیت آن چه کسانی بودند؟ [ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ] @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی

👍4,510👎20

18 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈123,000 views4,351 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

▫️فساد در نفت؛ نقش امنیتی‌ها چیست؟ نفت ایران سال‌هاست زیر تحریم فروخته می‌شود؛ با واسطه، تراستی، تریدر و شبکه‌های پنهان انتقال پول. اما سؤال اصلی این نیست که نفت چطور فروخته می‌شود؛ سؤال این است که چه کسی تصمیم می‌گیرد، چه کسی تأیید می‌کند و وقتی پول برنمی‌گردد، چه کسی پاسخگوست؟ در این برنامه می‌خواهیم درباره فساد در نفت و نقش #نهادهای_امنیتی در این ساختار حرف بزنیم. [ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ] @yashar_soltani | ی…

👍4,330👎21

13 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC≈98,800 views4,719 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

بزودی… @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی

👍4,670👎49

9 Sept 2026, 06:26 UTC≈145,000 views4,510 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

‏▫️کیفرخواست فساد در فوتبال ‏در پرونده #فساد_فوتبال⁩، برای تعدادی از مدیران ارشد و چهره‌های فدراسیون فوتبال به اتهام #اختلاس⁩ کیفرخواست صادر شده است. ▫️مهدی تاج⁩ ‏▫️محمدمهدی نبی ‏▫️احسان اصولی‌صفا ‏▫️تهمورث حیدری ‏▫️خداداد افشاریان ▫️محمدرضا ساکت ‏بر اساس قانون با صدور کیفرخواست همگی این افراد از حضور در فدراسیون منع و از کار منفصل می‌شوند. ‏این فقط یک پرونده درباره چند مدیر فوتبالی نیست؛ پای ساختاری در میان است …

👍4,500👎10

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @yashar_soltani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@yashar_soltani edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 September 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال شخصی یاشار سلطانی” (@yashar_soltani), 117,486 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yashar_soltani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.