Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116,514–116,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:08
116,862
+201
11 Aug 2026, 22:11
116,661
+102
11 Aug 2026, 00:11
116,559
-39
9 Aug 2026, 21:11
116,598
-33
8 Aug 2026, 20:34
116,631
-34
7 Aug 2026, 22:51
116,665
-27
6 Aug 2026, 23:27
116,692
-33
6 Aug 2026, 02:50
116,725
-15
6 Aug 2026, 01:32
116,740
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:06
116,740
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
87.5%
avg views ÷ 116,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
102,000
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
15 (5 May 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
511,200
Reactions total
19,776
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 09s
Average length
1m 35s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48,953 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
47,984
98.0%
👎
969
1.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,953reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▫️پول نفت کجاست؟ چه کسانی تراستی ها و تریدرها را تایید کردند؟
مسئولیت انتخاب و تأیید صلاحیت تراستیها و تریدرهای فروش نفت، برعهده «هیأت هفتنفره شعام» بوده است؛ همان اتاق فرمانی که درباره محرمانهترین بخش فروش نفت ایران تصمیم میگرفت.
اکنون باید روشن شود اعضای این هیأت چه کسانی بودهاند و هرکدام چه تصمیمی گرفتهاند؟
▫️صلاحیت حرفهای و امنیتی واسطهها را چه کسانی تأیید کردند؟ پشتوانه مالی تراستیها و توانایی آنان ب…
▫️امریکا به شاه هم اجازه غنی سازی اورانیوم نداد!
در دوره محمدرضا شاه پهلوی، ایران و آلمان به دنبال پیشنویس مهمی در قرارداد ساخت راکتور هستهای در ایران بودند.
بر اساس اسنادی که در ویکیلیکس مشاهده کردم، طی سالهای ۱۹۷۵ و ۱۹۷۶ میلادی (۱۳۵۴ و ۱۳۵۵) وزارت خارجه آمریکا رسماً به آلمان نوشت:
«پیشنویس توافق هستهای شما با ایران را قبول نداریم و ایران حق غنیسازی اورانیوم در خاک خود را ندارد.»
@yashar_soltani | یاش…
▫️پول نفت کجاست؟
رئیسجمهور و رئیس مجلس، کشور به کشور دنبال آزادکردن دلارهای بلوکهشدهاند؛ اما در وزارت نفت، پول نفت ایران در تاریکخانهای از تراستیها، واسطهها و حسابهای غیرشفاف گم میشود و گاهی فقط روی کاغذ وجود دارد.
به آن میگویند «#خالی_خوانی»!
این دیگر ضعف نظارت نیست؛ غارت ثروت ملی زیر پوشش محرمانگی و دور زدن تحریم است.
آقای وزیر نفت؛
یا نمیدانید پول نفت کجاست که صلاحیت ماندن ندارید،
یا میدان…
«از تهران راه افتادم و رفتم جنوب. رفتم اهواز، رفتم سوسنگرد، رفتم هویزه... وقتی برگشتم، واقعاً دلم تلنبار شده بود. برادرم هم کشته شده بود، دیدم چه مصیبتی را دارم تحمّل میکنم و مردم چه تحمّلی دارند و چه آراماند مردم دیگر شهرها. چون تهران تا موشک نخورد، جنگ را حس نکرد. درد من این بیحسی و بیتفاوتی مناطق دور از جنگ بود. دلم میخواست لااقل مناطق دیگر مملکت ما بفهمند که چه اتفاقی افتاده است. همین فکر وادارم کرد که بنشین…
اگر ایران هنوز ایستاده است،
بخشی از این ایستادگی را باید در #جنوب جستوجو کرد؛
جایی که مردمش سالهاست
بارِ امنیت این سرزمین را
بیهیاهو و بیادعا بر دوش کشیدهاند.
ثروتش را بردند؛
نفتش را بردند،
گازش را بردند،
اما سهم مردمش، سالها فقر، محرومیت و فراموشی بود.
با مردمی چنین نجیب،
همینقدر نانجیبانه رفتار شد.
@yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
▫️حاکمیت میداند از چه کسانی حرف میزنم.
عباس عراقچی از رفع تحریم نفت و پتروشیمی در توافق اولیه با امریکا خبر میدهد.
اما بدون پاکسازی این صنایع از برخی مدیران رانتی و فاسد، این درآمد هم مثل همیشه به جیب همانها میرود.
این پرونده را دنبال میکنم.
حاکمیت خوب میداند از چه کسانی حرف میزنم.
@yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
پاسخ به توییت رضایی سخنگوی کمیسیون امنیت ملی مجلس:
▫️نمیدانم از کدام لایه زمین توییت میزنی؛
▫️اما امیدوارم #تنگه_پایداری هم باز شود و این تفکر بحرانطلب و ویرانگر برای همیشه به حاشیه برود.
لینک توییت
@yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
🔴 ۶ میلیارد کره جنوبی در آلمان است؛ نه قطر!
۶ میلیارد دلار پول ایران قرار بود از کرهجنوبی به #قطر منتقل شود؛ اما در دوره #فرزین، سر از #آلمان درآورد و همانجا بلوکه شد.
حالا قالیباف و عراقچی برای آزادسازی همین پول راهی قطر شدهاند تا گرهای را باز کنند که تصمیم آن در دوره فرزین گرفته شد.
اگر درباره سرنوشت ۶ میلیارد دلار کشور به مقامات ارشد و نهادهای مسئول واقعیت گفته نشده، این فقط یک اشتباه مدیریتی نیست؛ ضر…
اینترنت پرو در آیینه توییتر
✍️ محمد تقیزاده
در اوایل سال ۱۴۰۵، طرح «اینترنت پرو» با هدف ارائه دسترسی پرسرعت و بینالملل به کسبوکارها راهاندازی شد. در مقابل، عموم مردم همچنان از اینترنت ملیِ محدود و کند استفاده میکنند.
1. مردم چه میگویند؟ (تحلیل گفتمان)
2. ساختار اعتراض چگونه است؟ (تحلیل شبکه بازنشر)
درحالی که یک خشم عمومی یکپارچه و اجماع نظر بر ضدیت با این طرح وجود دارد، ساختار اجتماعی این اعتراض پراکنده، ق…
▫️حالتان از این همه تناقض و دورویی بهم نمیخورد؟
دیروز هتل تاریخی عامریها کاشان را بهخاطر «حجاب» پلمب کردند؛ مسافران سرگردان شدند و ۹۰ نفر از پرسنل بیکار!
اما همزمان، شبها در میدانها و مراسمهایی مثل #جان_فدا، شعار «بیحجاب هم خواهر ماست» تکرار میشود و همان زنان با آزادترین پوشش در قاب رسمی دیده میشوند.
اگر حجاب قانون است، چرا اجرای آن اینقدر مقطعی و گزینشی است؟
حالتان از این همه تناقض و دورویی بهم ن…
▫️بحران زیستمحیطی در جزیره مارو (شیدور) ملقب به «مالدیو ایران» در خلیج فارس در پی نشت نفت به دلیل مورد هدف قرار گرفتن پالایشگاه لاوان
@yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
👍760👎50
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yashar_soltani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,139 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال شخصی یاشار سلطانی” (@yashar_soltani), 116,862 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yashar_soltani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
