Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
9,290 average views per post against 8,432 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.2%. Across the 5,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,203–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
17 of 17 published in the window (0 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
157,920
Mature posts only
113.8% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net +850. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,514–8,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 00:58
8,491
+59
5 Nov 2026, 06:56
8,432
-1
2 Nov 2026, 05:40
8,433
-22
30 Oct 2026, 06:30
8,455
-2
27 Oct 2026, 01:46
8,457
+13
24 Oct 2026, 05:36
8,444
+19
21 Oct 2026, 09:36
8,425
+82
18 Oct 2026, 00:27
8,343
-22
14 Oct 2026, 18:21
8,365
+4
11 Oct 2026, 18:38
8,361
+70
5 Oct 2026, 08:15
8,291
+9
27 Sept 2026, 10:56
8,282
-1
17 Sept 2026, 18:19
8,283
-13
13 Sept 2026, 14:59
8,296
+26
10 Sept 2026, 05:36
8,270
-22
4 Sept 2026, 15:56
8,292
-14
1 Sept 2026, 00:26
8,306
-3
29 Aug 2026, 04:12
8,309
+41
26 Aug 2026, 00:54
8,268
+28
22 Aug 2026, 22:19
8,240
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
109.6%
avg views ÷ 8,491 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,310
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
55 (1 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
176,810
Reactions total
5,370
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 00:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,686 reactions across 55 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,615
31.4%
❤
3,765
25.6%
👏
1,870
12.7%
👌
1,638
11.2%
💔
1,189
8.10%
😭
629
4.28%
❤🔥
284
1.93%
😢
159
1.08%
💯
111
0.756%
👎
85
0.579%
🤬
54
0.368%
🤣
53
0.361%
😡
45
0.306%
🤝
44
0.3%
🥰
21
0.143%
🤔
16
0.109%
😱
15
0.102%
🤯
14
0.095%
😐
10
0.068%
🫡
10
0.068%
18 further kinds
59
0.402%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,686 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
مارهای ضحاک و سه جوان دیگر:
حسن دیوبند. حمید کاظمی. رضا زنگنه.
در دیخون ۱۴۰۴، بازداشتشان کردند.
به صورتهایشان با دقت نگاه کنید.
آینه ترک میخورد از این ستم و بیداد بر جان اسیر در بند. چنان رنجشان دادند که ظرف چند ماه، بیست سال پیر شدند. انگار خودِ زمان را هم به بازجویی کشیدند و شکنجهاش کردند.
وکلای زندانها از شکنجههای قرون وسطایی میگویند.
مانند بسیاری به شدت احساس ناتوانی میکنم و دنیا بسیار دیده که این جنس…
جمهوری اعدامی، هرچه در ترکش داشت از تهدید و هراسافکنی، یکجا رها کرد.
از تهدید به مصادرهٔ دارایی مخالفان در غربت گرفته تا تهدید به بمبگذاری در تظاهرات فرانکفورت. اما این تیرها بر سنگ آمد و از سنگ بازگشت و راست بر فرق سر خودش فرود آمد. هزاران ایرانی، با پرچمهای شیر و خورشید که چون یالهای شیر غران در باد میرقصیدند، به اوستپارک سرازیر شدند، و شاهزاده با مردم سخن گفت.
شکوه فرانکفورت در قابی از شجاعت نشست: ایرانیان …
سرنوشت پنج امیر فقط در همین چند ماه اخیر؛ چهار امیرحسین و یک امیروفا
امیرحسین ملکی؛ از بازداشتشدگان اعتراضات دیماه، دوازدهم آبان در اصفهان اعدام شد.
امیرحسین ابراهیمی؛ دانشجوی بیستسالهٔ پزشکی، همان روز در همان زندان اعدام شد.
امیرحسین ابراهیمیِ دیگر؛ سیوچهارساله، نوزدهم دی در اصفهان با شلیک نیروهای حکومتی از پشت کشته شد.
چهارمی، امیرحسین موسوی است؛ صاحب حساب توییتری «جیمز بیدین». او را ۲۸ آذر ۱۴۰۳، نزدیک شش…
در میان خبرهای انتخابات آمریکا، پست پیروزی ابر کواس با پرچم فلسطین، برای من پرسشی پیش میآورد که چرا نماینده مجلس سنای نیویورک، باید پرچم کشور دیگری را به عنوان نماد در پست پیروزیاش در ایکس پست کند؟
او دربارهی ١١ سپتامبر گفته این فاجعه نتیجه اسلاموفوبیا بوده است!
ما ایرانیها برای نشنیدن هشدارها بهایی نزدیک به نیمقرن پرداختهایم. احمد کسروی داشتیم؛ کسی که دههها پیش از استقرار جمهوری اسلامی، هشدار داد که نتیجهی…
در تصاویر توییتهای حسابی با نام «عصمت شیخلر»، کاربری میپرسد: چطور از کودکان میناب میگویید و همچنان خواستار ادامهٔ جنگ هستید؟ پاسخ خانم شیخلر که در قسمت بیو اکانتش نوشته: شاعر و نویسنده با «گور پدر بچههای میناب» آغاز میشود و به اینجا میرسد که «هزار تا کودک مینابی فدای یک تار موی اسلام».
در نوشتهای دیگر از همین حساب هم آمده است: «هزاران کودک مینابی فدای یک تار موی آقا سیدمجتبی»؛ و معترضان به این سخن، «منافق» و …
نامهای به معلمی که میخواهم بزرگ بماند دربارهٔ یک تصویر، چند پرسش و یک باور: بزرگترین میراث ناملموس ما «ملت» است
در تصویری که این روزها دستبهدست میشود، ژاله آموزگار، پژوهشگر فرهنگ و زبانهای باستانی ایران، در دیداری رسمی در برابر یک روحانی خم شده است؛ این نوشته پرسشهای من از معنای این لحظه و بهای حفظ کار فرهنگی است.
خانم ژاله آموزگار عزیز، آیا مفهوم «ملت» بزرگترین میراث زندهی «ایران» نیست؟ وقتی تن این میرا…
کوروش، پدر ایرانزمین؛ این خانه برای زندگیِ فرزندان بود، نه عزاداریِ پدران.
استوانهی کوروش، در کنار شرح استقرار فرمانرواییاش در بابل، از بازسازی خانهها و بازگرداندن گروههایی از کوچدادهشدگان به سرزمینشان میگوید.
من در مفهوم خانه و بازگشت درنگ میکنم. در پسِ این چند کلمهی تاریخی، مفهوم زندگی برجسته است.
بازسازی نیایشگاهها، خانهها و بازگشت یعنی زندهبودن و زندگی. خوشحالی کسانی را تصور میکنم که خانهشان آب…
تماشاگرِ فردای دیگران
ما انتخابات همهٔ دنیا را بلدیم، جز انتخابات خودمان.
این روزها تایملاین X پر است از پیامهایی که میان ایرانیان و ونزوئلاییها رد و بدل میشود. بعضی شادیها با گریه از راه میرسند؛ انگار آدمی وقتی بالاخره میتواند نفس بکشد، تازه درمییابد که چه مدت نفسش را در سینه حبس کرده بوده است.
مثل آن دختر در عکسِ بازگشت ماریا کورینا ماچادو به ونزوئلا؛ میان جمعیت ایستاده، دست بر دهان، و زارزار میگرید؛ گو…
ردّ پای مسکو :
به ایران که میرسد کمکدست حکومت میشود در سرکوب و به فرانسه که میرسد بنزین میشود روی آتش اعتراضات.
شبکههای روسی چگونه نارضایتی اقتصادی فرانسه را علیه حمایت از اوکراین به کار میگیرند؟
خبرهای اعتراض فرانسه را که میخوانم، دلم میرود ایران. ما ایرانیها تا آخر عمرمان دیگر خیابان را هیچوقت فقط خیابان نمیبینیم.
پشت هر جمعیت، خاطرهای از سرکوب است و پشت هر دوربین، ترسی.
در میان خبرهای فرانسه و گز…
حتی مزارفرزندان ما را تبعید کردید، اما بیابان هم «ایران» است.
تنِ فرزندان ایران را کجا میتوان پنهان کرد که خاکش بیگانه باشد؟
که ایران نباشد؟
اینجا فقط یک بیابان بود. جمهوری اسلامی شاهدی از او ساخت به وسعت جغرافیای حافظه.
جمهوری اسلامی ممکن است بتواند جای پیکرها را تعیین کند؛ اما این مزارها جای او را در تاریخ نشان میدهند.
برهوت را انتخاب کرد تا بازماندگان همراهی نداشته باشند. میخواست پس از جانشان، جایشان را هم ب…
در آبدانان مردم برنج به هوا پاشیدند و در فرانسه فروشگاهها غارت شد. این میان یک نفر دربارهٔ آن نوشت: «مردم آبدانان طبیعتاً نمیتونن از مغازههای پاریس دزدی کنن چون پاریس نیستن، آبدانانن :)»
در این توییت رفتار باشکوه مردم آبدانان به نبودِ فرصتِ دزدی نسبت داده شده است. این یک نفر در این متن تنها نیست. او نمایندهی طیفی است که یاد گرفته به ایران و ایرانی از بالا نگاه کند.
برنجی که به آسمان میرود نشانه است. من این نشا…
باز هم تحقیرِ ملت بزرگ ایران که نیمقرن است بهای تاریخ را سنگین پرداختند با جان و مال و عمر و جوانی.
عدهای راه افتادهاند و مردم ایران را مسخره میکنند که چرا به آتشِ فرانسه با حافظهی تاریخی و تجربهی زیستهتان مینگرید و چون این کار را میکنید، مبتلای «جهل»اید.
آه که این فهمِ والامرتبهی! شما، ما را کُشت و تماممان کرد…
ای همهی شمایانی که این روزها مردم را به تمسخر گرفتهاید که شما همهچیز را به «کارما» فروکاست…
👌169👍64❤25❤🔥10🥰2👎1🤯1
Signed Zahra Abdi
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Abdinovelist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Abdinovelist edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ninja Nerd Videos @ninjanerdmedical · 32,470 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زهرا عبدی” (@Abdinovelist), 8,491 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Abdinovelist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.