11 measurements spanning 8 days, net +55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,367–17,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 07:34
17,434
+4
12 Aug 2026, 23:05
17,430
+27
11 Aug 2026, 19:45
17,403
-3
10 Aug 2026, 22:45
17,406
+20
10 Aug 2026, 02:17
17,386
-14
9 Aug 2026, 02:52
17,400
+9
8 Aug 2026, 04:53
17,391
+13
7 Aug 2026, 01:56
17,378
+2
6 Aug 2026, 05:28
17,376
-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:50
17,379
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:49
17,379
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.8%
avg views ÷ 17,434 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,600
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
41 (29 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
257,210
Reactions total
4,041
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
624
Videos
69
Links
265
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,015 reactions across 38 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,159
53.8%
👍
1,441
35.9%
👌
173
4.31%
👏
60
1.49%
👎
47
1.17%
🔥
32
0.797%
❤🔥
29
0.722%
🥴
23
0.573%
🙏
14
0.349%
🤔
11
0.274%
💔
5
0.125%
🫡
5
0.125%
🤷♀
4
0.1%
💯
3
0.075%
🤬
3
0.075%
😡
2
0.05%
🤷♂
2
0.05%
⚡
1
0.025%
🥰
1
0.025%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,041reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پرسش اصلی بنابراین فقط این نیست که «چه چیزی باید آزاد یا خصوصی شود؟»، بلکه این است که پس از اصلاح، چه کسانی قواعد جدید را کنترل میکنند و هزینهها و منافع آن چگونه توزیع میشود؟
اگر همان گروههایی که در نظم موجود به رانت دسترسی دارند، پس از اصلاح نیز کنترل داراییهای خصوصیشده، اعتبار، واردات، قراردادها و انحصارات بازار را در اختیار بگیرند، اصلاح اقتصادی ممکن است فقط شکل رانت را تغییر دهد، نه منطق آن را. بنابراین خطر…
از دولت رانتی-توزیعی تا سرمایهداری خویشاوندی: درس سوریه برای ایران
در بحث درباره زمینههای اقتصادی بحران سوریه، معمولاً دو روایت مطرح میشود: یک روایت، اقتصاد دولتمحور بعثی، یارانههای گسترده، بنگاههای ناکارآمد و فساد بوروکراتیک را عامل اصلی میداند؛ روایت دیگر، اصلاحات بازارگرایانه دوره بشار اسد، کاهش حمایتهای اجتماعی و گسترش بخش خصوصی را برجسته میکند. اما تجربه سوریه را نمیتوان صرفاً با دوگانه سوسیالیسم یا ن…
تحریم و سازوکار شکلگیری چرخه بحران ارزی
نمودار دو نقطه عطف مهم را نشان میدهد: تشدید تحریمهای نفتی و بانکی در سالهای ۱۳۹۰–۱۳۹۱ و بازگشت تحریمها پس از خروج آمریکا از برجام در سال ۱۳۹۷. همزمانی این دو رویداد با جهش نرخ دلار تصادفی نیست؛ اما تمام کاهش ارزش ریال را نیز نمیتوان فقط به تحریم نسبت داد. تحریم در اقتصاد ایران بیشتر بهعنوان «فعالکننده و تشدیدکننده ناترازیهای داخلی» عمل کرده و شوک خارجی را به یک چرخه …
آیا صادرات نفت ایران از مسیر ریلی میتواند جایگزین صادرات دریایی شود؟
در هفتههای اخیر گزارشهایی منتشر شده مبنی بر اینکه ایران در حال بررسی استفاده از مسیرهای ریلی برای انتقال نفت خود به چین، بهویژه از طریق خاک افغانستان و آسیای مرکزی، است. این ایده در نگاه نخست میتواند یک راهکار جذاب برای دور زدن محدودیتهای دریایی و کاهش وابستگی ایران به مسیرهای صادراتی سنتی باشد. با این حال، بررسی دقیق ظرفیتهای فنی، اقتصادی و…
عبارت «حمله به یکی، حمله به همه» تنها به اندازه اراده سیاسی و زیرساخت نظامی پشت آن اعتبار دارد؛ و در حال حاضر هیچیک از این دو به اندازه کافی وجود ندارد. هنوز فرماندهی مشترک، نیروهای از پیش مستقرشده، قواعد درگیری مورد توافق و حتی تعریف روشنی از معنای «پاسخ جمعی» وجود ندارد.
در عمل، اشتراک اطلاعات و انتقال تسلیحات بسیار محتملتر از اعزام نیرو خواهد بود. فروش پهپادهای ترکیه به عربستان و مأموریتهای آموزشی چندین دههای…
برعکس، راهبرد آنکارا دقیقاً بر انباشت گزینههای راهبردی بیشتر استوار است. بنابراین، توافق مکه به ترکیه اجازه میدهد خود را بهعنوان بازیگر و میانجی امنیتی جهان اسلام تثبیت کند. این امر با مسیر کلی سیاست خارجی ترکیه سازگار است: خودمختاری راهبردی بدون انزوای غربی. از این منظر، ترکیه ممکن است بزرگترین برنده راهبردی این توافق باشد.
عنصر چهارم، پوششی در برابر محور اسرائیل-امارات است؛ محوری که از زمان توافق ابراهیم به یک…
توافق مکه: محور سهجانبه جدید امنیتی در خاورمیانه؟
آرش رئیسینژاد
در ۷ اوت، محمد بن سلمان، ولیعهد عربستان سعودی، رجب طیب اردوغان، رئیسجمهور ترکیه، و شهباز شریف، نخستوزیر پاکستان، در مقدسترین شهر اسلام یک پیمان دفاع متقابل را امضا کردند؛ توافقی که بلافاصله «توافق مکه» نام گرفت. این چارچوب دفاعی متقابل که بر پایه پیمان راهبردی دفاعی دوجانبه عربستان و پاکستان در سپتامبر ۲۰۲۵ بنا شده است، تعهدی در زمینه دفاع جمعی، م…
از هرمز تا بابالمندب؛ محدودشدن مسیرهای جایگزین نفت
کنار هم قرار دادن این دو نمودار نشان میدهد که بازار نفت پس از آغاز جنگ هرمز در دو مرحله با بحران سازگار شده است. در مرحله نخست، عبور کشتیها از هرمز از متوسط حدود ۱۳۰ کشتی پیش از جنگ به سطوح بسیار پایین سقوط کرد، اما بخشی از این شوک از طریق تغییر مسیر جریان نفت جذب شد. نمودار بابالمندب این سازگاری را بهوضوح نشان میدهد: جریان غرب به شرق که در اواخر فوریه حدود ۳ …
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @iran_simorq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@iran_simorq edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 90,270 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آرش رئیسینژاد” (@iran_simorq), 17,434 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iran_simorq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
