Channel
@ForeignPolicy_Ai
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
772subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002278019789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ForeignPolicy_Ai |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ForeignPolicy_Ai |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @icils_org/1321 Dec 2025, 18:04 UTC | @ForeignPolicy_Ai/135 · this entry1 Dec 2025, 18:05 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @icils_org/1417 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC | @ForeignPolicy_Ai/147 · this entry7 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ForeignPolicy_Ai/149 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC | @icils_org/14420 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC | 1.00 | 44 minutes |
| @ForeignPolicy_Ai/151 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC | @icils_org/14623 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @icils_org | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @icils_org (4–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 December 2025 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @icils_org. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 772 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 772 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 December 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 915 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
جمعه - 16 اَمرداد 1405 📚 McKinsey Report 🇯🇵 از سرگردانی تا پویایی: بازآفرینی ژاپن برای رقابت در عصری نو 🇯🇵 ✍️ مککنزی در [گزارش تازه خود](https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-asia/from-drift-to-dynamism-reinventing-japan-to-compete-in-a-new-era?stcr=58664585B1E14E41B6DF16CA97900AF8&cid=mgp_opr-eml-alt-asx-mgp-glb--&hlkid=4f381d3ae7ce4eb38ce5ab26a55c7574&hctky=15340552&hdpid=6ecc56e5-d044-43a3-aa92-…
⏳ تنها چند ساعت تا آغاز نشست McKinsey Review باقی مانده است. امشب، از ساعت ۱۹:۰۰، مهمترین گزارشها و بینشهای هفته McKinsey را با حضور دکتر میثم طهرانی مرور و تحلیل میکنیم. 👈 یکی از نقاط قوت این نشست، حضور دکتر میثم طهرانی بهعنوان تحلیلگر برنامه است. ایشان دارای دکترای فیزیک از مؤسسه فناوری ماساچوست (MIT)، ایالات متحده آمریکا و دکترای فلسفه علم از دانشگاه بریتیش کلمبیا (University of British Columbia)، کانادا …
🌍 یکی از دغدغههای اصلی مدیران امروز اینه که دنیا با سرعت زیادی در حال تغییره، اما زمان کافی برای دنبال کردن همه تحلیلها و منابع وجود نداره. 🎯 هدف McKinsey Review اینه که این فاصله رو کم کنه، یعنی مهمترین ایدهها و تحلیلهای مدیریتی دنیا رو در زمانی کوتاه، به شکلی کاربردی در اختیار مدیران قرار بده. 👈 در واقع این برنامه هم یک جلسه آموزشی هست، هم یک مسیر برای بهروز ماندن، بهتر تصمیم گرفتن و توسعه نگاه مدیریتیه. 👉 …
مکنزی (McKinsey ) چیست؟ مکنزی یکی از معتبرترین و شناختهشدهترین شرکتهای مشاوره مدیریت در جهان است که نزدیک به ۱۰۰ سال سابقه فعالیت دارد. این مجموعه به مدیران عامل، هیئتمدیره، دولتها و بزرگترین شرکتهای دنیا کمک میکند تا تصمیمهای بهتر بگیرند، مشکلات پیچیده را حل کنند و سازمانهای خود را متحول کنند. به زبان ساده، اگر یک شرکت بزرگ یا حتی یک دولت با یک چالش مهم روبهرو باشد، معمولاً از مشاوران مکنزی کمک میگیرد …
سلام و وقت بخیر 🌱 از اینکه به برنامه McKinsey Review علاقهمند شدید، خوشحالم. اجازه بدهید فقط یک نکته را بگویم... تقریباً هر هفته، مکنزی بهعنوان معتبرترین شرکت مشاوره مدیریت جهان، گزارشهایی منتشر میکند که قبل از همه، روی میز مدیران عامل بزرگترین شرکتهای دنیا قرار میگیرد؛ گزارشهایی درباره آینده کسبوکار، هوش مصنوعی، استراتژی، رهبری، اقتصاد و تحول سازمانها. اما واقعیت این است که اکثر این گزارشها: ✅ طولانی …
Think2Link | McKinsey Review از گزارش تا تصمیم؛ تحلیل عمیق آنچه McKinsey این هفته منتشر کرده است. هر هفته دهها گزارش، مقاله و پژوهش مدیریتی توسط McKinsey منتشر میشود؛ اما مدیران ارشد معمولاً فرصت مطالعه همه آنها را ندارند. در McKinsey Review، مهمترین بینشهای هفته را انتخاب میکنیم، آنها را تحلیل میکنیم و به زبان تصمیمگیری مدیران ترجمه میکنیم؛ تا بدانید کدام روندها، فناوریها و تحولات میتوانند آینده کسبو…
Photo, posted without a caption
علاقهمندان به شرکت در سخنرانی دکتر یاوری (میزبان: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی)، لطفا توجه داشته باشید که ثبتنام در این برنامه الزامی است. جهت رزرو صندلی و ثبتنام، از طریق لینک زیر اقدام بفرمایید: https://survey.porsline.ir/s/yyw64kGV با سپاس
🤖 آینده انسان در عصر هوش مصنوعی انجمنهای علمی دانشجویی حقوق و مدیریت دانشگاه شهید بهشتی برگزار میکنند: بشر در آستانه بزرگترین تحول تاریخی خود قرار دارد. هوش مصنوعی چه تغییری در آینده شغلی، حقوقی و زیستمحیطی ما ایجاد خواهد کرد؟ در این نشست ویژه، با حضور اساتید برجسته بینالمللی به بررسی این چالشها و فرصتها میپردازیم. 🎤 مدرسین دوره: دکتر علیرضا یاوری (نائب رئیس کنفدراسیون اتاقهای بازرگانی و صنعت آسیا و اقیا…
«ذهن، واقعیت را خام نمیخورد، آن را میپزد، ادویه میزند و معمولاً مسمومش میکند.» واقعیت، خیلی وقتها اونقدری که ما توی ذهنمون بزرگش میکنیم، ترسناک یا عجیب نیست. ولی مغز ما استاد داستانسازیـه یه اتفاق ساده رو میگیره، هزار تا نکنه، یعنی چی؟، پس حتماً... بهش اضافه میکنه، بعد هم تحویلمون میده به اسم حقیقت. یه نفر دیر جواب میده، ذهن فوراً سناریو میچینه: ناراحته… بیاحترامی کرد… دیگه مثل قبل نیست… یه اشتباه کو…
کارزار «درخواست عوارضی از تنگه هرمز» https://www.karzar.net/296894 با به اشتراک گذاری این لینک و ارسال آن برای دیگران، این کارزار را اطلاعرسانی کنید و از آنها برای جمعآوری امضا کمک بگیرید. #منفعل_نباشیم
جنگی که با هدف تغییر رژیم در ایران و نابودی زیرساخت هستهای و توان موشکی آن آغاز شده بود، اکنون به یک بنبست راهبردی رسیده و در تنگه هرمز قفل شده است. آنچه زمانی کارزاری مبتنی بر فشار بود، اکنون با جغرافیا برخورد کرده است. تنگه عملاً محدود شده و این وضعیت پیامدهای عمیقی برای بازارهای جهانی انرژی، زنجیرههای تأمین و جریانهای کلی ارزش در اقتصاد جهانی دارد. اهمیت استراتژیک تنگه تا آن اندازه بالاست که اگر ایران بتواند…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ForeignPolicy_Ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ForeignPolicy” (@ForeignPolicy_Ai), 772 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForeignPolicy_Ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.