Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
136 measurements spanning 52 days, net -10,876. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141,937–156,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 136
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 21:56
143,568
-24
26 Sept 2026, 19:54
143,592
-197
25 Sept 2026, 18:57
143,789
-146
25 Sept 2026, 00:40
143,935
-841
19 Sept 2026, 16:16
144,776
-182
18 Sept 2026, 16:37
144,958
-239
17 Sept 2026, 12:55
145,197
-9
17 Sept 2026, 10:21
145,206
-26
17 Sept 2026, 06:57
145,232
-163
16 Sept 2026, 07:40
145,395
-153
15 Sept 2026, 11:40
145,548
-13
15 Sept 2026, 09:59
145,561
-60
15 Sept 2026, 04:18
145,621
-107
14 Sept 2026, 15:57
145,728
-142
13 Sept 2026, 22:00
145,870
no change
13 Sept 2026, 21:01
145,870
-149
13 Sept 2026, 11:36
146,019
-45
13 Sept 2026, 02:16
146,064
-213
12 Sept 2026, 07:00
146,277
-37
12 Sept 2026, 03:38
146,314
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.74%
avg views ÷ 143,568 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,380
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.938%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
50 (24 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
172,010
Reactions total
1,613
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 21s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,420 reactions across 49 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
946
39.1%
🔥
243
10.0%
🤣
239
9.88%
👍
222
9.17%
👏
84
3.47%
😁
70
2.89%
😍
59
2.44%
🤡
54
2.23%
👎
50
2.07%
👌
48
1.98%
💩
36
1.49%
😭
28
1.16%
😱
26
1.07%
💔
23
0.95%
🥴
23
0.95%
🤯
22
0.909%
👀
21
0.868%
🎃
19
0.785%
🤔
19
0.785%
🥰
18
0.744%
33 further kinds
170
7.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,454 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 50 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iphone. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😏 Not as scratch-resistant as we'd think
The difference between titanium and aluminum, visualized.
🥺 Turns out the new iPhone 18 Pro Max is pretty prone to scratches. Especially noticeable on the burgundy finish.
🔎 One tech guy put it side by side with his iPhone 15 Pro Max, which he's been using daily for three years. The 18 Pro Max? Only four days old.
@iPhone
🏋️♀️ Apple is working on a screenless fitness tracker
📰 According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple has been exploring the idea for several months and is now developing prototypes. The prototypes reportedly consist of a thin fabric band and a sensor-equipped computing module, with no screen in sight – the key difference from the display-driven Apple Watch.
• The move comes as competitors such as Whoop and smart ri…
👂 First detailed leaks on the @iPhone 20 Pro have surfaced
Even smaller Dynamic Island and a "borderless" display.
📰 Apple is repotedly testing a quad-curved design — where all four edges of the screen are curved. The result is a smooth effect that makes it look like there are no bezels at all.
📏 The displays themselves will grow too: 6.41 inches for the Pro and 6.96 inches for the Pro Max. This year's current mod…
🎙 Apple opens its own concert venue Apple Music Hall
📍 The venue is located at London's Battersea Power Station, right under Apple's European headquarters, and holds 600 people.
🎵 Both big-name artists and up-and-coming bands will perform on stage. All shows are set to be filmed and streamed live via Apple Music.
🔔 The visitors can already sign up for updates on upcoming events on the Apple Music Hall website.
@…
🔗 Google made a "MacBook" for Android and called it... Googlebook
📰 Google teamed up with Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP and Lenovo to ship the thing Android has been missing for a decade: a real ecosystem partner for your phone = their answer to iPhone + MacBook.
📱 Apple: iPhone + MacBook, Handoff, AirDrop, Universal Control
📱 Google: Android + Googlebook, Continue On, Files, Cast My Apps
Same idea, just with Gemini instead…
😒 But Mark Gurman isn't inspired
📱 He says we shouldn't bother upgrading to the iPhone 18 Pro if you're already on the previous model. Social media is flooded with glowing reviews from tech bloggers right now, but a lot of that "excitement" is reportedly just paid promo dressed up as organic content — deals struck in exchange for early units, not real enthusiasm.
🤷♂️ He doesn't spell out exactly what's underwhelm…
📸 Apple releases official photos from the iPhone 18 Pro launch day in NY and beyond
📍At the Apple Fifth Avenue store, customers were greeted by much of Apple's top brass: John Ternus, Greg Joswiak, Deirdre O'Brien, Molly Anderson, Steve Lemay, and Lily Rincon.
📱 The first buyers didn't just pick up their pre-orders, but also got hands-on time with the new lineup and tips on how to use the latest features.
@iPhone
📱 Apple rolled out a massive global campaign for the iPhone Duo
📍 Samsung, of course, couldn't resist. They swooped in and bought the billboard right next to Apple's ad at Delhi Airport, putting up their own clapback right beside it.
Classic: Apple announces and Samsung claps back within hours. The rivalry never sleeps 🍿
@iPhone
📱 iPhone 18 Pro reviews are in: great camera, better battery, no big surprises
🧐 First reviews of the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max are out, and the verdict is familiar: solid upgrade, nothing revolutionary. One reviewer described it essentially as last year's Pro with a better chip, camera, and bigger battery, plus new colors to help people spot the new models.
📸 Camera: New variable aperture (f/1.48–f/4) boosts low-l…
🍎 So, how do you like the new iOS and Golden Gate macOS?
What's new, general:
🤪 New Siri – understands on-screen context, in-app actions, and has broader world knowledge (iPhone 15 Pro / 16 and newer)
🛝 Siri Camera – ask questions right from the Camera app, even split a restaurant bill
🖋 Write with Siri – writing help in Messages and Mail, adapts to your personal style
🌼 Photos – Clean Up, Extend, and perspective ch…
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @iphone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Technology Boxs @TechnologyBoxs · 25,031 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
Tech Guide @techguide · 41,573 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Cute Cats @cutecats · 36,099 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
🤖 OpenAI | ChatGPT | GPT-4o | GPT-4👨🏻💻 @gpt_anthropic · 24,950 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Apple News” (@iphone), 143,568 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iphone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.