Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Институт философии РАН

Channel

Институт философии РАН

@iph_ras

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

2,510subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001397285631
TypeChannel
Username@iph_ras
Created13 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iph_ras

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4662,5102,4886 August 2026 — 2,467 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,467 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,466 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,468 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,470 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,475 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,478 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,484 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,487 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,492 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,498 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,507 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,510 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,459–2,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 22:022,510+3
12 Sept 2026, 07:362,507+9
8 Sept 2026, 03:372,498+6
2 Sept 2026, 17:232,492+5
30 Aug 2026, 11:452,487+3
27 Aug 2026, 18:162,484+6
25 Aug 2026, 00:072,478+3
21 Aug 2026, 21:582,475+5
19 Aug 2026, 03:262,470+2
15 Aug 2026, 19:062,468+2
12 Aug 2026, 17:342,466-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:352,467no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:202,467first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3638.7%
🔥3335.5%
❤‍🔥1111.8%
👍77.53%
😁33.23%
👏22.15%
🤔11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC200 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

5.7.2. История философии | Аспирантура — 2026 🌟 Продолжаем знакомить вас с направлениями подготовки аспирантуры Института философии РАН. 📎 Направление 5.7.2 «История философии» даёт возможность углубленно изучить методы и подходы историко-философского исследования как одного из ключевых направлений гуманитарного знания. Программа помогает рассматривать историю философии как целостный мировой и одновременно многогр…

❤5❤‍🔥2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC355 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

XII Всероссийская премия «За верность науке» ⚡️ Министерство науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации объявило о старте приёма заявок на XII Всероссийскую премию «За верность науке» — одно из ключевых мероприятий Десятилетия науки и технологий. 🌟 Премия направлена на популяризацию научных достижений, формирование позитивного образа ученого, привлечение молодежи в научно-технологическую сферу и укрепление до…

❤‍🔥4👍2🔥2❤1

5 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC438 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Беседа с Ольгой Столяровой о монографии «Мир в контексте: реализм, релятивизм и философское объяснение» 🔸Мы обсудили с д.филос.н., ведущим научным сотрудником сектора социальной эпистемологии Ольгой Евгеньевной Столяровой ключевые проблемы её недавно вышедшей монографии «Мир в контексте: реализм, релятивизм и философское объяснение» 🌐 Подробнее

🔥14❤5❤‍🔥3🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC479 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Идеи академика И.Т. Фролова в XXI веке Идеи академика И.Т. Фролова в XXI веке Фроловские чтения в Институте человека РАН и Институте философии РАН / под ред. С.Н. Корсакова, Г.Л. Белкиной; ред.сост. М.И. Фролова. – М.: Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация», 2026. – 352 с. ISBN 978-5-88373-913-1 🔸В книге «Идеи академика И.Т. Фролова в XXI веке» представлены материалы научных Чтений, посвящённых памяти выдающегося русского фил…

❤7🔥3😁2

3 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC492 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый выпуск журнала «Человек» 💡На сайте опубликован выпуск журнала «Человек» за 2026 год. Т. 37. Nº4. 🌐 Предлагаем ознакомиться с номером по ссылке. #журнал_человек #человек

🔥5❤4👏2

3 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC529 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

5.7.3. Эстетика | Аспирантура 2026 🌟 Продолжаем знакомить вас с направлениями подготовки аспирантуры Института философии РАН. 🔸 Программа 5.7.3 «Эстетика» направлена на изучение эстетики как философской дисциплины, исследующей природу художественного опыта, восприятия и культурных практик. Аспиранты осваивают методы анализа чувственной, эмоциональной и аффективной сфер человеческого существования, что позволяет гл…

❤2🔥2❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC735 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Взгляд: июль Июль подарил немало интересных публикаций сотрудников Института философии РАН. Собрали главное в ежемесячном дайджесте 😎 ☀️ ВЕРЮ & НЕ ВЕРЮ Екатерина Коростиченко, н.с. сектора современной западной философии, обратилась к истории Дня семьи, любви и верности. Она рассказала о житии Петра и Февронии Муромских, напомнив, что история святых начинается вовсе не с романтического сюжета. Испытания, данные об…

❤11👍3🔥2😁1

30 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC566 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

5.7.4. Этика | Аспирантура 2026 🌟 Продолжаем знакомить вас с направлениями подготовки аспирантуры Института философии РАН. 🔸Направление 5.7.4 «Этика» ориентировано на подготовку исследователей в области философии морали и современных этических исследований. В ходе обучения аспиранты: — формируют целостное представление об этике как философской дисциплине и самостоятельной области научного знания; — осваивают основ…

🔥3👍2❤1❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC≈623 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Интервью с Анной Сахаровой о монографии «Лингвистическая одиссея науки: через сомнение к границам знания» 👤 Научный сотрудник сектора социальной эпистемологии Анна Сахарова – о том, почему физики пишут «вероятно» чаще, чем «несомненно», чем ИИ отличается от учёного и как лингвистика может стать эмпирическим фундаментом философии. 🌐 Подробнее

29 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC≈620 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Розин В.М. Реконструкция философских и художественных произведений Розин В.М. Реконструкция философских и художественных произведений. (Гуманитарно-методологическое исследование). – М.: Голос, 2026. – 290 с. ISBN 978-5-91932-038-8 📖 В издании представлены реконструкции философских и художественных произведений, выполненные автором в последние годы. Книга знакомит читателя с новым прочтением известных произведений,…

28 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC≈578 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

5.7.5. Логика | Аспирантура 2026 🌟 Продолжаем знакомить вас с направлениями подготовки аспирантуры Института философии РАН. 🔸Направление 5.7.5 «Логика» ориентировано на углублённое изучение ключевых разделов современной логики. 📎 В ходе обучения аспиранты изучают основные теории и актуальные проблемы логической семантики, знакомятся с фундаментальными результатами металогических исследований и осваивают современны…

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @iph_ras. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Гуманитарные конференции
@confhum · 25,812
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Брэндом, Роберт (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…РООИ «Реабилитация»|год=2021|страниц=224|isbn=978-5-88373-690-1}} [https://t.me/iph_ras/37][https://syg.ma/@anastasiia-konishchieva/fienomienologhiia-du…”
read 13 September 2026
Джохадзе, Давид Викторович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…добавлен ботом -->]; общественный деятель[https://t.me/iph_ras/1331 Telegram: View @iph_ras]…”
read 13 September 2026
Умершие в сентябре 2023 года (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…советский и российский философ, сотрудник [[ИФ РАН]]{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/iph_ras/1089 |title=Telegram: View @iph_ras<!-- Заголовок добавлен ботом…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Институт философии РАН” (@iph_ras), 2,510 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iph_ras.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.