Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for гуманитарный визг

Channel

гуманитарный визг

@legaldrama

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,158subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002093459863
TypeChannel
Username@legaldrama
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/legaldrama

Growth

2,1362,1582,1476 August 2026 — 2,136 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,138 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,136 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,157 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,158 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 11 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,133–2,161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:432,158+1
13 Aug 2026, 08:162,157+21
10 Aug 2026, 00:282,136-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:092,138+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:162,136no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:322,136first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.7%
avg views ÷ 2,158 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (23 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total25,474
Reactions total883
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

767 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥24231.6%
💘14719.2%
custom 608000331393009108511715.3%
😁10814.1%
💔8411.0%
custom 5265128785291798183364.69%
custom 5312028178896663364202.61%
custom 5350755400788502627101.30%
😢30.391%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 883reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC453 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#memetime

❤‍🔥19custom 60800033139300910854😁1

7 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC559 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Дороничев говорит, что на юриста нет смысла учиться пять лет, потому что юристов заменит клод😎, а философия будет нужна как и математика, потому что она, оказывается, наука фундаментальная💅 это я не чтобы поехидничать, а то еще подумаете, что у меня этот, как его... ресентимент... ведь на самом деле по отзывам клод довольно успешно выполняет некоторые юридические функции

💘17💔3😁3custom 53120281788966633641

6 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC626 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawyersreading

789. Соловьева А.Е. К вопросу о соотношении услуг эротического массажа и проституции // Человек. Общество. Право: материалы межд. науч. конференции. Омск, 2025. С. 180-182.

❤‍🔥27😁12custom 60800033139300910852

4 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC858 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

на каком уровне неопределенности вы находитесь?😋

  1. 1. вау, вы в практически полной определенности😎5%
  2. 2. неплохо,у вас есть несколько возможных сценариев будущего, для которых можно оценить вероятность😎12%
  3. 3. ну что ж, у вас есть сценарии будущего, но точно вероятность их наступления не оценить🤢25%
  4. 4.пупупу.у вас есть сценарии будущего, знаете их исходы, но какой наступит - хз😓24%
  5. 5. поздравляем! вы в ситуации «неизвестные неизвестности» - не знаете ни сценариев, ни вероятности🤡🥰34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 608000331393009108515custom 53507554007885026277

4 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC811 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я тут давеча выяснила, что Decision making under deep uncertainty (DMDU) — это наука, стремящаяся прокалькулировать принятие решений в условиях неопределенности. как и любая наука DMDU 😏 задает классификации — в ее случае виды неопределенностей см. опрос ниже

❤‍🔥22

4 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC760 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

один из основных моих выводов #memetime

custom 531202817889666336419custom 608000331393009108513❤‍🔥6

3 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC855 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

это концептуальная юриспруденция понятий… эй…а вы что подумали?🤑 #memetime

custom 608000331393009108527😁10❤‍🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC842 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

штош у нас тут #события ⏺ философы и юристы, ну мёд... обсуждение философии права Гегеля Axia Education + Андрей Александрович Тесля когда/где: 8 августа 12:00, онлайн ⏺ Трёхчасовой мастер-класс по работе с большими языковыми моделями для гуманитариев от Ольги Алиевой когда/где 10 августа 16:00 онлайн ⏺ Социализм в ХХ веке: многообразие моделей и социокультурных практик когда/где: 11 сентября 2026 г. в Научно-кул

custom 526512878529179818320❤‍🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,130 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я извиняюсь…🪩 вчера была в ДК Рассвет (обожаю) на концептуально уморительном и по факту восхитительном ивенте - дне рождения Арнольда Шварценеггера – музыкальном фестивале ансамбля Hauntology. Послушала симфоническое техно, встретила Катю Хан💕 в ДК Рассвет много классических и экспериментальных мероприятий, кино, театр, поэтические вечера – и рядом ресторан Альма, кстати💕

💔16💘9custom 60800033139300910855😁2❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,070 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥10

31 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,090 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💅undesirable💅 organisation опубликовала книгу Сергея Антонова про громкие уголовные процессы 1866-1884 #книжка

💘17❤‍🔥10custom 60800033139300910854

30 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,170 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

довольно нишево

❤‍🔥32custom 608000331393009108514💘12

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @legaldrama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTCFinal Results177 voters

на каком уровне неопределенности вы находитесь?😋

  1. 1. вау, вы в практически полной определенности😎5%
  2. 2. неплохо,у вас есть несколько возможных сценариев будущего, для которых можно оценить вероятность😎12%
  3. 3. ну что ж, у вас есть сценарии будущего, но точно вероятность их наступления не оценить🤢25%
  4. 4.пупупу.у вас есть сценарии будущего, знаете их исходы, но какой наступит - хз😓24%
  5. 5. поздравляем! вы в ситуации «неизвестные неизвестности» - не знаете ни сценариев, ни вероятности🤡🥰34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 44,664 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“гуманитарный визг” (@legaldrama), 2,158 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legaldrama.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.