Channel
@JohnFassbinderAFP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
933subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001790738811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JohnFassbinderAFP |
| Created | 3 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JohnFassbinderAFP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 933 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 932 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 932 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (12 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,567 |
| Reactions total | 254 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
279 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 80 | 28.7% | |
| 🫡 | 71 | 25.4% | |
| 🤬 | 69 | 24.7% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 6.45% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 3.94% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.358% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.358% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Free Expression Foundation is in need of an attorney licensed to practice in Tennessee for an important First Amendment case. You can contact us by DM on X, by email glen@freeexpressionfoundation.org, or our contact form on our website: https://freeexpressionfoundation.org/contact-fef/
❤4
Attorneys in the Free Expression Foundation's network are riding the momentum generated by the victory at the state level for the Jacobs "littering" case. FEF lawyers filed a motion to expedite the Jacobses' appeal to pursue 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the officials who attacked their First Amendment rights. The motion recounts, "Abstention in the face of such manifest bad faith is error, any further prosecutio…
🔥13❤1
Glen Allen, a lawyer in the Free Expression Foundation's network, sent a demand letter to Accuracy in Media on behalf of Austin Franco for various causes of action related to their impersonation of Justice in the Classroom. Full details to be released soon!
🫡17⚡2
The New York Post, which, like Fox News, is owned by Rupert Murdoch, got Austin Franco's parents to denounce him for a story—then doxed their home and plastered his parents' photos up on their website just to punish them anyway. You can see from the caption that they sent one of their reporters to another state just to get a nice photograph of their house that they could share with the world (I censored the pic here…
🤬15❤1
Furthermore, I believe in leading by example. While I’m hardly in the position to do so, if nobody in the vast network that is Our Cause is capable of housing him, as a last resort, I will do what I can to offer him temporary accommodations in my own home, or help locate them elsewhere. If I am willing to offer this, nobody else has an excuse not to. I therefore hope and call upon others within Our Cause, especially …
🫡21⚡2
Austin Franco’s parents have decided to kick him out of their home. In a just and normal society, one that still functioned as a nation rather than a managed dystopia, parents would be proud of a son who walked onto a national platform, stood his ground, and refused to recant what he knows to be true. They would recognize that, above every other consideration, he is their son, and the integrity under pressure he has…
⚡21
For those of you who do not know, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is a federal civil rights statute. It essentially allows private citizens to sue state or local government officials in federal court when those officials violate constitutional rights, most relevantly here, the First Amendment. In practice, it is a major legal tool used to go after officials who retaliate against protected speech. When the government uses arrests, …
⚡8
Huge victory for the First Amendment by attorneys in the Free Expression Foundation's network! Judge Brian Fortner granted the general demurrer and motion to quash by defendants Philip and Hilary Jacobs. Georgia brought littering charges against them for distributing flyers the Thought Police didn't like. Granting a general demurrer means that, even if every fact set out in the indictment is true, no crime occurred…
👏11
Embrace being called an anti-Semite. They do not care how carefully you frame it or how softly you couch the language. There is no soft-pedaling being anti-jewish power, and this interview is further evidence of that. They will call you immature. They will call you irresponsible. They will call you a hypocrite. They will call you evil incarnate. They will tell you that you’re barred from their institutions. In retur…
🫡33⚡3
Piers Morgan doing the bidding of the kosher-system and attempting to assassinate Austin Franco's character. T.me/TheWesternChauvinist1
🤬15⚡1
🇺🇸 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 Piers Morgan Cuts the Interview Short After Austin Franco Refuses to Apologize and Doubles Down “They are tired of seeing their country destitute by third worlders” 📎 Charging
⚡15🤬1
Shiloh Hendrix has been found guilty of one of the two counts of Disorderly Conduct against the foreign man who went out of his way to follow and film her and her child. This is a gross miscarriage of justice, and a clear example of a two-tiered, anti-White justice system which clearly motivated these unjust charges. While at a park with her child, Shiloh was allegedly the victim of theft, then followed and filmed b…
🤬28
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JohnFassbinderAFP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 275,748 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@JohnFassbinderAFP named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“John Fassbinder AFP” (@JohnFassbinderAFP), 933 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JohnFassbinderAFP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.