Channel
@JudgeSmoreCult
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,465subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001853654035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JudgeSmoreCult |
| Created | 23 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JudgeSmoreCult |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 4,465 | +6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 4,459 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 4,465 | +6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 4,459 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 4,454 | +13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 4,441 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 4,437 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 4,445 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 4,448 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 4,450 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 4,446 | +23 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 4,423 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 4,426 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 4,427 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 62 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,465 reactions across 62 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 546 | 37.3% | |
| 🥰 | 160 | 10.9% | |
| 🙈 | 150 | 10.2% | |
| 🗿 | 149 | 10.2% | |
| 🔥 | 147 | 10.0% | |
| 💊 | 93 | 6.35% | |
| 👨💻 | 76 | 5.19% | |
| 💅 | 74 | 5.05% | |
| 🍌 | 70 | 4.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Citing Gaza war, pharma firm Teva seeks to keep its Israeli origins from US jury — Times of Israel https://www.timesofisrael.com/citing-gaza-war-pharma-firm-teva-seeks-to-keep-its-israeli-origins-from-us-jury/
🙈4💅1
❗️Drug giant asks US judge to bar references to its Israeli origin at trial Teva Pharmaceuticals has asked a US judge to bar insurer Humana from telling jurors that the company is Israeli during a major drug price-fixing trial, arguing that public sentiment surrounding the Israeli war on Gaza could unfairly influence the proceedings and undermine its right to a fair trial. In a filing submitted Wednesday to a feder…
🙈4🍌3💅1
Photo, posted without a caption
🗿4🥰2
The same report notes that “the offspring of intermarriages have become increasingly likely to identify as Jewish in adulthood.” I would personally categorize them as jewish either way, but it’s notable that they do tend to embrace the label.
💯8🙈4
While he doesn’t cite a source, ZH is most likely referring to this Pew survey of American jews from 2020. The 75% figure (actually 72%) is only for non-Orthodox jews married since 2010. If you look at Orthodox jews alone, the intermarriage rate is only 2%. With around 10% of US jews being Orthodox, we’re left with a core group of 650,000-750,000 that is extremely averse to intermarriage. Ben Shapiro is one example …
🍌3👨💻3💯1🙈1
Anyone telling you that jews will become a “non-factor” due to outbreeding within a few generations is either misunderstanding or misrepresenting how jews operate. Having observed him for a while, I would guess that ZH is in the latter category. Jews bring in new blood from other races from time to time. It’s also true that some branches do peel off and mix to the point their conscious jewish identity is erased, but…
💯9💊1🙈1
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰6🗿3
Former NBA player and presumed aspiring rapper Royce White is selling this as a media stunt for BRCC conservatives to soyjak over, but it’s just as likely to be the initial stage of him coming out of the closet. All Lunchtime Rowdies are gay. It’s only a question of degree. https://x.com/foxnews/status/2085913583502680126
🍌8💅1
“We eat pork in this nation,” says jew larping as Crusader. https://x.com/jakelang/status/2085871791495368714
🍌13🙈6👨💻3
Posted without readable text
💯12👨💻11🥰1
As with all things, if you don't understand jewish power nothing in the world makes sense. Keeping the Egyptian government well funded is a top priority because Egypt is a country with a large, competent military and a population that hates Israel, which is within easy striking distance. That money is spent to maintain a ZOG puppet government with a brutal police state to keep the people in check. It needs to end.
💯19🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🗿9🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @JudgeSmoreCult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Judge Frog’s S’more Cult” (@JudgeSmoreCult), 4,465 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JudgeSmoreCult.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.