He has clearly taken one too many blows to the head. https://t.me/JudgeSmoreCult/16023
🤣14💯1

Channel
@alogs4
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
537subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002027242417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alogs4 |
| Description | Lollygagging goatfuckers In this house, we stan MAGA (not really) Boost us though: https://t.me/alogs4?boost |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alogs4 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 537 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 537 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
154 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 47 | 30.5% | |
| 💯 | 42 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 13.6% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 12.3% | |
| ✍ | 14 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.60% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 10 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
He has clearly taken one too many blows to the head. https://t.me/JudgeSmoreCult/16023
🤣14💯1
If that grifting broad Witzke is telling the truth about the new pope "attacking the MAGA agenda," then I suppose that pretty much more than makes up for his other flaws. https://t.me/LaurenWitzkeOfficial/11604
Photo, posted without a caption
"Hotheaded youngsters could be here," he thought. "There could be hotheaded youngsters anywhere... "I HATE HOTHEADED YOUNGSTERS." https://t.me/JudgeSmoreCult/15945
👍2
"Even in death, I still cuck." https://www.npr.org/2025/05/07/g-s1-64640/ai-impact-statement-murder-victim
😁6
And in time, "handsome" Lomez too.
https://vxtwitter.com/Black_Pilled/status/1920092913566179522
Her chat is back. Have at it, boys. https://t.me/lauren_witzke_chat25
The Houthis declared victory on Tuesday after President Trump announced the US would stop bombing Yemen as part of a deal between the US and Yemen which reportedly does not include any provisions for Israel's security. As the entire point of the US bombing campaign was to secure Israel's safety, this amounts to a total capitulation and an acknowledgement that the Trump administration's ramped up bombing campaign acc…
👏4🤨2
Nuked? Not deleted by her? X to doubt. https://t.me/LaurenWitzkeOfficial/11587
Lauren Witzke made a new chat/comments not too long ago only to shut it down again 🤣
🤣7
https://fixupx.com/Black_Pilled/status/1918638375008891331
💯19
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alogs4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alogs Anonymous 4” (@alogs4), 537 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alogs4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.