Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Богдан и его нос по ветру

Channel

Богдан и его нос по ветру

@hearthesmell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,792subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001107704378
TypeChannel
Username@hearthesmell
DescriptionЭвалюатор в парфюмерном R&D. Нюхаю духи, смотрю сериалы и читаю книги, но платят мне пока лишь за первое… Сотрудничество: директ канала (Богдан). Реклама: @valeria_agenty (Валерия). РКН: https://bit.ly/nahu1c3n5uru
Created9 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hearthesmell

Growth

19,79219,84119,816.56 August 2026 — 19,841 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,838 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,835 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,826 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,824 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,815 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,813 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,803 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,796 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,792 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,785–19,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:3919,792-4
13 Aug 2026, 11:1419,796-7
12 Aug 2026, 11:3719,803-10
11 Aug 2026, 14:1519,813-2
10 Aug 2026, 15:1619,815-9
9 Aug 2026, 18:4219,824-2
8 Aug 2026, 19:3219,826-9
7 Aug 2026, 20:2319,835-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:3019,838-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:1919,841first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 19,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,470
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held34 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total83,810
Reactions total2,473
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,110
Videos
1,380
Links
2,630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 06s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,170 reactions across 29 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
97645.0%
😁61928.5%
🔥1788.20%
🥰813.73%
🥴813.73%
🤔783.59%
🌚401.84%
👏361.66%
👍281.29%
🤯221.01%
🐳210.968%
🤩100.461%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 34 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hearthesmell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,240 views45 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Eto ya достаю Тринадцатый час Картье, CDG BLACK и Le Labo Patchouli 24, стоит лишь столбику термометра опуститься ниже 20°С.

😁387

14 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,900 views50 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

MIXIT выпускает дебютную коллекцию Perfume Diary, которая задумана как дневник воспоминаний. В самом деле, как сообщает бренд, «фотографии хранят лица, а песни — слова. Но только запах может по-настоящему вернуть нас в прошлое, перевернуть страницу и заставить пережить прекрасные мгновения снова». Слоган коллекции — «Позволь хорошему случиться». PAGE 01 раскрывает модную тему, в которой интенсивное фруктовое звучани

24🐳10🌚6🔥6🤔2🤯2

14 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,810 views62 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Когда вера в науку иссякает, в ход идут суеверия. Сегодня лаборатория отмечает медовый спас 🍯

😁40🔥22

13 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,110 views77 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Метеопрогноз до конца недели ☔️

🥴46😁31

12 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈2,300 views158 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Идея лежала на поверхности, но только сегодняшняя встреча с клиентом соединила эти разрозненные мысли в моей голове. Овощные ароматы стали пользоваться умеренной популярностью только сейчас, потому что завершился второй демографический переход и выросли целые поколения, которым в детстве не приходилось заниматься прополкой и собирать колорадских жуков. Для них поездка в деревню не вызывает вьетнамских флешбэков в де

78😁65👍9👏5🥴1

12 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈2,470 views80 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Я: думаю возобновить французский Лента: напоминает, как опасны оговорки на языке Дюма 🎞️ lara.explique.fr

😁728

11 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈2,490 views126 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Когда коллега-флейворист на просьбу показать вещество говорит «о боже, нет, пожалуйста, только не это!», значит, компонент действительно воняет. Сегодня нам с этим итальянским panzerotto понадобился бисметилтиометан, также известный как сульфид трюфеля. В следовых количествах, в сочетании с 1-октен-3-олом (грибным спиртом) и пачулями, формирует ту самую нуарную грань в TF Black Orchid. В лаборатории флакончик этой ч

😁8527🔥12🐳2

11 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈2,460 views96 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Мой новый любимый мем. А губа у студентов московского GIP не дура!

😁7119🤔6

10 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈2,750 views124 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Просто такая сильная любовь 🤍 Terre d’Hermès Eau Très Fraîche, «ледяная прохлада альдегидов и горечь севильских апельсинов». Снят с производства.

84🔥35🤯5

10 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,800 views52 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Хорошая идея — отправить книжному блогеру аромат Sailing Day вместе с копией «Одиссеи». Идея так себе — не проверить, что перевод гомеровской поэмы почему-то в прозе. Кто бы мог подумать, что наличие гуманитарного образования будет так цениться в XXI веке: наделяет ещё одним фильтром критической оценки, помогает распознавать несостыковки и отделять зёрна от плевел. Нужно ли для этого четыре года просиживать штаны в

52

9 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC≈2,950 views51 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Кто-то ухватит Essential Parfums The Musc от Калиссы Борисовны Беккер, пока мы с Викой ржём без причины🤹‍♂️🎪

44🌚7

9 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈3,150 views74 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Video

Такая я мразь, девачьки: не писал о дарёном флаконе, который стоял в шкафу все эти годы и мощнейше символизировал. Композиция, на самом деле, красивая: розово-смородиново-пачулевый неошипр от вундеркинда Патриса Ревийяра. Дизайн, я бы сказал, эклектичен. А что думаете вы?

🥰3720🥴9🌚3👏2🤔2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @hearthesmell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,968 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Богдан и его нос по ветру” (@hearthesmell), 19,792 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hearthesmell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.