Когда меня вновь спросят, почему я люблю Москву, я покажу это!
❤15
Signed Вероника

Channel
@vingratit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,194subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001811809056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vingratit |
| Created | 19 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vingratit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 4,194 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 4,199 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 4,206 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 4,206 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (26 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,653 |
| Reactions total | 612 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
612 reactions across 22 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 608 | 99.3% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 612reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vingratit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда меня вновь спросят, почему я люблю Москву, я покажу это!
❤15
Signed Вероника
Mirabile V Canto Старт – мята. Возможно, переворачивающаяся в анис или гвоздику. Сперва зеленый холод обретает мягкую специевость. Лаванда и герань. Затем проявляется пыльная мягкая сладость опопонакса, ванили и бобов тонка. Лактоны. Существует ли мятное молоко? Кажется, было что-то такое на азиатских полках. Оно должно пахнуть так! Различные смолы. Совсем не восточные и не раскаленные. Они не плавятся и не текут.…
❤33
Signed Вероника
Сегодня без зла, я в Superstitious Frederic Malle просто потому что ничего иного на себе в эту жару видеть бы не хотела #sotd
❤18
Signed Вероника
Amberesque Moresque Смолы с каплей розы. Или аромату нужно больше жары, или он сам по себе такой, но смолы не разогреваются и не плавятся на коже, а сидят довольно холодно. Золотой флакон с золотыми переливами внутри. Хочется больше роскоши и размаха! Пачули и цитрусовая шипучесть. Малина, герань, розовый перец, бобы тонка. Пузырчатая розовая газировка. Красивый аромат. Он меняется. Играет. Показывает в раскрытии …
❤22
Signed Вероника
Fire At Will Jovoy Paris Сахарный-сахарный. Кажется, буду думать о флаконе. Не знала, что вне Baccarat Rouge 540 Maison Francis Kurkdjian можно создать идеальный десерт из детства, тот самый расплавленный в ложке сахар. Местами подогревшая кипящая карамель. Один в один. И нет смысла что-то сверху придумывать и описывать. В раскрытии появляется мягкая пудровая ваниль.
❤29
Signed Вероника
Canvas Aqualis Мятная жвачка и мыльная пена. Мягкий цветочный кондиционер. Фрезия, иланг, ирис, жасмин, роза, мимоза. Околопятерочный цветочный блок. Не могу не похвалить такую отсылку к классике. Конечно, этот аромат уступает, но он звучит мягче и современнее, а No 5 Chanel может пугать, я это знаю, хоть и совсем не понимаю. Я из тех, кто назовет ее без сомнений величайшим творением парфюмерии!
❤25😁3
Signed Вероника
Loudo Sarah Baker Почему-то ожидала больше шоколада. Опять наложила свои ожидания на чужую задумку. Так делать нельзя. Черный горький шоколад есть, но он далеко не главный в композиции. В первую очередь я бы назвала сухой уд, папирус, нагармоту. Не помню, в какой бане неявно пахнет шоколадом. В финской? Сухой ароматичный воздух плавящегося под довольно приличной температурой дерева. Нравится!
❤26
Signed Вероника
Только хотела жаловаться что целиком ушла в #бьюти покупки, а последний флакон брала 19 апреля, как моя парфюмерно-покупочная импотенция испарилась. Были приобретены душочки. Да какие! Редкие, снятые… Жду посылку с нетерпением. PS: В коменты скину макияжики зелеными палетками Воеводиной. Прекрасные в работе тени!
❤25
Signed Вероника
Hasard Bazar Maison Matine Сладкий, ванильный, древесный, слегка розово-фруктовый. Приятная пудровая сладость мускуса. Мускус, ваниль, пачули, бобы тонка. Обычный аромат, но флакон симпатичный.
❤21
Signed Вероника
#sotd Myths Amouage. Описывать не буду, просто знайте, что мне в них хо-ро-шо!
❤31
Signed Вероника
Phantasma Les Liquides Imaginaires Приятный свежий чай с мятой. Пирамида: черный чай, рис, юзу, мускус, можжевельник, древесные ноты, имбирь. Для меня это не рисовый аромат. Только если слегка рисовая вода, и то не вслепую,а притягивая за уши после взгляда на пирамиду. Пока не нашла для себя ничего полностью и правдиво рисового, но чайность здесь приятная. Прирудренная. Правда, во многих линейках бренда я слышу оче…
❤37
Signed Вероника
Не могла выбрать парфюм под образ. Попросила мужа описать меня сегодня, что бы на основе его характеристики выбрать парфюм. - Лимончелло Сразу вспомнила один прекрасный Lemon Sorbet Etro, но у меня его в коллекции нет, и вообще я не лимонная душа. Дальше. -Ромашка Mémoire d’une Odeur Gucci где-то в отливантах был, но и искать среди трех сотен лень, и его мускусность в +27 меня уничтожит. - Тюльпан Оно! Сама бы …
❤43
Signed Вероника
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @vingratit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 669,723 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В поиске лучших духов” (@vingratit), 4,194 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vingratit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.