Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Любовь Берлянская / Evaluatrix 🌹🐈‍⬛ 🐈

Channel

Любовь Берлянская / Evaluatrix 🌹🐈‍⬛ 🐈

@evaluatrix

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,495subscribers

-94 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001060931312
TypeChannel
Username@evaluatrix
DescriptionЛюбовь Берлянская Ceylon Fragrance Group Syren Ольфактофил. Здесь обо всем, что нюхают, чувствуют, пробуют и пьют. Связь @unfragranced РКН https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67335bf43438580dea814a11
Created14 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/evaluatrix

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,49310,59210,542.55 August 2026 — 10,589 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,589 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,592 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,589 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,587 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,586 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,585 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,588 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,587 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,583 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,581 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,585 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,582 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,583 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,578 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,574 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,575 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,576 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,573 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,572 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,565 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,561 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,556 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,560 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,557 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,558 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,552 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,544 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,539 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,541 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,540 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,538 subscribers30 September 2026 — 10,526 subscribers5 October 2026 — 10,522 subscribers9 October 2026 — 10,516 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,517 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,518 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,520 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,521 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,510 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,513 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,516 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,520 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,515 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,507 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,512 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,503 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,502 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,506 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,509 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,505 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,503 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,501 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,500 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,499 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,500 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,498 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,495 subscribers10 November 2026 — 10,493 subscribers12 November 2026 — 10,495 subscribers10,4955 August 202612 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,478–10,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 10:5710,495+2
10 Nov 2026, 05:5910,493-2
8 Nov 2026, 15:2010,495-3
7 Nov 2026, 10:5510,498-2
6 Nov 2026, 09:5610,500+1
4 Nov 2026, 08:3610,499-1
3 Nov 2026, 08:4710,500-1
2 Nov 2026, 09:5910,501-2
1 Nov 2026, 10:3610,503-2
31 Oct 2026, 13:0610,505-4
30 Oct 2026, 14:2810,509+3
29 Oct 2026, 11:3610,506+4
27 Oct 2026, 06:1610,502-1
26 Oct 2026, 09:0710,503-9
25 Oct 2026, 09:3510,512+5
24 Oct 2026, 06:5510,507-8
23 Oct 2026, 08:1510,515-5
22 Oct 2026, 07:0610,520+4
20 Oct 2026, 22:2110,516+3
19 Oct 2026, 22:1410,513first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 10,495 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held67 (26 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total72,768
Reactions total3,500
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,150
Videos
≈379
Links
≈1,730

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32m 33s
Average length
10m 51s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,701 reactions across 65 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,10281.6%
⚡4815.53%
✍3293.78%
👏2122.44%
😱1942.23%
🤔1391.60%
🦄1051.21%
👌881.01%
🗿470.54%
😈20.023%
🤬20.023%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 67 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evaluatrix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (16.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC588 views59 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Немного выдохнула перепоручив Дзена профессионалам. И #комоднедели

❤59

14 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,060 views150 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

Никогда не делала таких вещей, но к сожалению все бывает в первый раз. Дзен попал в беду. Собаки пролезли под забор на соседний участок, где наши коты часто тусят и котику досталось. 6 рёбер сломано и ещё всякое неприятное. Ему сейчас нужен стационар, который я со своими текущими расходами просто не тяну финансово. Прошу помощи канала. Перевести можно на сбор в альфе: https://alfaonline.org/public/mrv2/qvpgiU16Im…

❤108😱42

13 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,240 views69 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @parfologiyaVideo

В новом выпуске #7_фактов_7_кадров — Иван Якимов, главный парфюмер компании SYREN и автор канала Parf Scriptum. В этом видео живой и искренний рассказ о пути, который привёл Ивана в парфюмерию, о его творческих поисках и личных увлечениях. Вы узнаете, как устроен обычный день главного парфюмера, с какими задачами Иван сталкивается ежедневно в своей работе и что служит для него источником вдохновения. Приятного прос…

❤53👏13⚡3

13 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,340 views70 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Если вы не видели интервью с Ваней - посмотрите. Мне очень повезло с ним работать. Гениальный преподаватель в свои 26. Да и просто очень талантливый и добрый человек у которого всем есть чему поучиться.

❤52👏12⚡5🦄1

12 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,680 views51 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Paris Minuit Burdin вышел в 2014м за год до создания Баккары Руж. Но это пахнет как первая ласточка ольфакторного профиля, ставшего прародителем целого направления. В моем понимании Париж гораздо больше классические духи, чем хит 2015го, но и таких бешеных характеристик у Парижской полночи нет, хотя и тех что есть достаточно, чтобы придушить полвагона метро. Аромат яростно накатывает алой штормовой волной выдержанн…

❤51

10 Nov 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,480 views444 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

Новый год и свои 47 отметила ударным рабочим днем: не только поработала, но и тренинг провела. А ещё у меня самые лучшие коллеги. Потому что реально на работу как на праздник. Без шуток.

❤339👏70⚡21🦄14

8 Nov 2026, 08:39 UTC≈2,920 views136 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Rouge Nocturne by Terry Розы, вино и кровь. И пачули, конечно. Сексуальность в стиле старого времени. Создавала картинку в готическом стиле, а получились вайбы СССР. И я решила оставить как есть, потому что аромату это очень подходит. Дурацкий фильм, комедия положений (ненавижу такие комедии) 1991го - Агенты КГБ тоже влюбляются. Не помню, что за кино, но само название очень ложится в суть аромата. А если посерьез…

❤136

7 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC≈2,940 views152 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#комоднедели

❤134🦄14👏4

6 Nov 2026, 09:59 UTC≈3,140 views77 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026

Киндрэт - самый слабый и скучный цикл у Пехова. Классические вампиры, кланы и конспирологическая чушь. Мне категорически не нравится лор, но за сюжетом все равно следить интересно. И па-бам. Первое провальное и дурацкое описание ароматов у Пехова. Бессмысленный набор фраз с перечислением ноток. Не несёт никакой смысловой или ольфакторной нагрузки. Если убрать это описание - не изменится вообще ничего. Ее присутств…

❤59🗿18

4 Nov 2026, 07:52 UTC≈3,010 views176 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

Passage d'Enfer L'Artisan Parfumeur - композиция переходных состояний, тонкого пограничья и лиминальных пространств. Почти всегда носится у меня несколько дней подряд. Цветочный, дурманящий ладан с умирающими лилиями. Запах тонкий, спокойный, умиротворяющий. Есть в нем что-то от храмовых благовоний, но нельзя назвать такой ладан церковным. Здесь какая-то более древняя религия, ближе к язычеству. Аромат тихий, не н…

❤152🦄15⚡9

1 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈3,440 views79 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Ajmal Chapter 2 из коллекции The Untold Stories. Лирическое отступление о том, как я ненавижу маркировку цифрами в парфюмерии и насколько это не запоминается и безлико. (Лично для меня) Все эти опусы, истории, нумерованные главы и части сливаются в белый шум без дополнительной информации. С другой стороны это практически тестирования вслепую. Ряд одинаковых пробирок с номерами для смеллинг сессии. Вторая часть Аж…

❤49🤔28👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @evaluatrix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Что-то на томфордовском
@tf_love · 22,073
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
Духи наизнанку | Кирилл Хайкин
@sciscent · 35,697
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Я вас не слышу!
@vasneslyshno · 49,503
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Богдан и его нос по ветру™
@hearthesmell · 19,127
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 September 2026
Та самая хранительница
@kosmetan_fr · 25,513
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Подержите мой шлейф
@Perfumeritta · 20,346
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 September 2026
Geltek за стеклом
@geltek_cosmetics · 41,064
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Мать флаконов
@smelldate · 31,437
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
ANGERMOLAEVA
@angermolaeva · 81,299
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
BeautyAD Anna Dycheva
@Beauty_AD · 25,991
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Randewoo.ru
@randewoo_official · 68,821
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
Бьюти-телеграммы
@beauty_goldman · 21,619
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
Гели всея Руси
@geltek_skincare · 37,017
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Ксения Вебер
@xeniaweber · 30,488
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Любовь Берлянская / Evaluatrix 🌹🐈‍⬛ 🐈” (@evaluatrix), 10,495 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evaluatrix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.