Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Виля - тут

@vilyahere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,172subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612001706
TypeChannel
Username@vilyahere
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vilyahere

Growth

1,1691,1721,170.56 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,172 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,169–1,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:471,172+3
6 Aug 2026, 21:311,169no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:321,169first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.5%
avg views ÷ 1,172 subscribers
Avg views / post
335
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,673
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

441 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25658.0%
🔥5011.3%
🤣388.62%
🕊276.12%
👍184.08%
💯143.17%
😁132.95%
❤‍🔥92.04%
💔40.907%
👏30.68%
🥰30.68%
🐳20.454%
🙏20.454%
🎉10.227%
😢10.227%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 441reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC143 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Готова запись нашей беседы с Леной Лазорской https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk2uaTMJAXE Надо ли переложить с ютьюба на другую платформу или вы справляетесь?

10👍5🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC344 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Услышала фразу, которая понравилась мне настолько, что я даже запросила (и получила) разрешение на публикацию. ХОРОШО СЕБЯ ЖИТЬ Звучит немного как задача с тремя неизвестными. Или, как минимум, переменными. И немного как план.

45🕊4🐳2

25 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC345 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Про индивидуальную работу. Напоминаю, что сейчас есть часы для индивидуальных встреч. Разовые консультации, краткосрочные программы (в т ч про усталость и восстановление) или более долгосрочные истории для решения ваших задач. Есть даже вечерние часы (что большая редкость). Если вам актуально - контакты в профиле.

🔥8💯3🙏2

21 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC405 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В четверг вечером 23 июля я приду в гости к Лене Лазорской поговорить об эмбодименте. Лена специалист по работе с голосом, и, похоже, нам есть что горячо обсудить на эфире. Вот что пишет сама Лена: Друзья, рада вам сообщить, что на этой неделе состоится эфир, который я хотела очень давно. В гостях у меня - Александра Вильвовская, человек, благодаря которому тысячи русскоязычных специалистов познакомились с эмбодим

🔥106

9 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC432 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Спасибо большое всем откликнувшимся на предыдущий пост! Буду думать. А пока вот снова есть вопрос. Хочу в конце месяца снова сделать какой-то полезный практикум, но никак не могу нащупать тему, которая была бы актуальна сейчас (лето вообще такое время - как будто все не так остро, что ли...) Про что было важно сейчас получать, узнать, попрактиковать? Дайте знать в комментариях, пожалуйста

7❤‍🔥4🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC510 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Последние года 3 я ношу внутри себя один вопрос. Носила бы и дальше, но сейчас, похоже, он перешёл в сферу прагматики, поэтому я хочу проговорить его вслух и услышать ваш отклик. Проекту "Тело - в дело" осенью официально будет 12 лет. И все это время основное наше дело было обучение эмбодименту специалистов. Когда я все это затевала, у меня не было ни грана сомнения - это очень надо! И чем больше людей обратит вним

27💯11🔥4

5 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC484 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"У Байдена боли, у Трампа боли, у Нетаньяху боли, а у Дашеньки не боли!" Чего только ни услышишь воскресным утром в московской кофейне))

🤣30😁13🕊4

4 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC501 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Любимая Саша Гриева написала классный пост про усталость и выгорание. Плюсуюсь отчаянно. При этом одна мысль меня прям резанула своей очевидностью и важностью. Усталость ДО (пандемии/войны/эмиграции) — вообще не то же самое, что усталость ПОСЛЕ. Это выражается в том числе так, что старый подход к ним может вообще не работать... То, что раньше считалось бонусом, вишенкой на торте (медитация, прогулки, выезд на природ

29🔥6🕊4

3 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC402 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вчера было 1000 дней с 7 октября. А пред этим, в июне, - 4 года как я оказалась связанной с Израилем. Весь этот опыт - и израильской культуры, и, особенно, войн - вырастил во мне одну неожиданную позицию. Ее можно описать вопросом: И что, мир рухнет? Это новая для меня штука - я скорее всю жизнь была склонна к повышенной ответственности и поиску правильных решений/действий. А теперь вот отрос внутри такой неожиданны

19🕊8❤‍🔥5😢1

1 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTC381 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В субботу встретились. Записи практикума готовы (заказать можно по ссылке в предыдущем посте). Подробно разобрали про физиологию и всякие молекулы, про то какие "мелочи" съедают и возвращают энергию и попробовали всякие телесные лайфхаки. А вот в индивидуальной работе с этой темой все гораздо интереснее. Там есть возможность не просто по физиологии или эмоциям/границам пройтись, но обнаружить небольшие телесные патт

26🕊7

25 Jun 2026, 06:09 UTC490 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вернусь к теме восстановления сил. В начале месяца я приглашала вас на короткую программу (5 или 10 сессий) или разовые консультации (места ещё есть, пишите если что) и сейчас потихоньку встречаюсь с клиентами про это. И знаете, что любопытно? Многие состояния, проявления усталости, "симптомы" - они не просто повторяются, они и мне как родные. Теоретически понятно: "усталость" - это хорошо известный и понятный физио

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vilyahere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 191,844 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виля - тут” (@vilyahere), 1,172 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vilyahere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.