Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Golems Klub

@golemsklub2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,567subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002104587540
TypeChannel
Username@golemsklub2
DescriptionUn complotiste, c'est juste un con qui a compris trop tôt ! Canal d'humour trash, méchant, hétéro et viril avec des poils ! Pour contacter l'admin en privé ⤵️ @Thegolemsbot Pets et giclées ♥️
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/golemsklub2

Growth

12,55112,56712,5596 August 2026 — 12,554 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,551 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,558 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,556 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,551 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,558 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,565 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,567 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,549–12,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:0312,567+2
11 Aug 2026, 20:0112,565+7
10 Aug 2026, 22:2112,558+7
9 Aug 2026, 23:3312,551-5
9 Aug 2026, 01:1112,556-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:4612,558+7
6 Aug 2026, 22:5512,551-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:4612,554first reading

Engagement

103 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.5%
avg views ÷ 12,567 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,580
103 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
103
of 103 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held103 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total368,548
Reactions total22,985
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12,500
Videos
9,900
Links
1,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
40m 57s
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

22,985 reactions across 103 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣10,12144.0%
💩1,7427.58%
🤮1,3846.02%
👍1,2465.42%
🤬1,0724.66%
💊1,0644.63%
💯9304.05%
🤡8613.75%
7393.22%
🍌6102.65%
👏5272.29%
🔥4762.07%
🎉4331.88%
🤯3491.52%
😎3321.44%
🙏2250.979%
🗿1780.774%
😢1540.67%
💅1490.648%
🤔1390.605%
3 further kinds2541.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,985reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC724 views56 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/Golemsklub3 Déjà de retour 😏

😎32👏11🔥4🤣3👍21🐳1💅1

12 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC822 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Le compte X est définitivement suspendu. On ne peut doxxer le compte de Sword, un compte dédié au doxxing. C'est un privilège juif !

💊28🤮11🔥8🤬6🤣5🎉21👍1

12 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,520 views121 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Avez-vous déjà entendu un écologiste alarmiste parler du CO2 émis à cause des guerres ? Ukraine, Russie, Gaza, Israël, les pays arabes, l'Iran... Ça fait 4 ans que des infrastructures pétrolières sont bombardées, des pétroliers, des missiles dans tout les sens, etc. J'imagine même pas le nombre de gigatonnes de CO2 dégagées, mais ils nous parlent encore de nos climatiseurs qui causent des îlots de chaleur. Ils ve

💯76🤣26👏84👍2💊2🤡2🤬1

12 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈2,340 views206 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

C'est un génocide.

💯91😢48💊27🙏12🤬8👏7😱5🤮4

12 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈2,350 views231 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Les médias vous font croire qu'il y a une éclipse, mais en fait, c'est Alice Cordier qui est passée devant le Soleil.

🤣215👎6💩3🍌2💅2💯2👍1

12 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈2,500 views242 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Voici à quoi ressemble un bébé de 34 semaines hors de l’utérus. Dans le Massachusetts, vous pouvez désormais avorter un bébé non né à cet âge en raison du nouveau décret signé par les démocrates. La seule différence est l’emplacement de l’enfant.

🤮119🤬66😢28🙏119🔥3💊2💯2

12 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈2,420 views110 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

On entend beaucoup parler de l'AIPAC mais pas assez du parlement juif européen. Un parlement dans le parlement de la colonie sioniste EU.

🤮68💊25🤯7💯3👍2🗿2💩1🤬1

12 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈2,490 views172 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🎯

🤣121🍌248🐳7😱5💩4💅2🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈2,610 views197 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Glissade irlandaise chez Auchan à Avignon. Paddy parle bien le sioniste.

🤣11150👏21😎9🔥4🗿2

12 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈2,900 views141 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

A gauche, Débunker des Étoiles se plaint des ingérences russes. A droite, Débunker des Étoiles en soirée.

💊78💩45🤣14🤬2🔥1🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,760 views212 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Je suis sûr que c'est un Snorky

🤣145💩31👍16💯12💊7😎1

12 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,980 views225 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Kenji Girac affirme que les Gitans sont les frères des Gitans circoncis. Le présentateur n'a pas l'air trop d'accord.

🤣151💩51💊12🤮9😎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @golemsklub2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@golemsklub2 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTCAnonymous Poll1,460 voters approx.

Pour les présidentielles, vous :

  1. Votez28%
  2. Ne votez pas33%
  3. Ne votez plus37%
  4. Ne votiez plus mais vous allez voter en 20277%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTCAnonymous Poll1,500 voters approx.

Nos plus gros problèmes sont : (Plusieurs réponses possibles parmi ces propositions)

  1. L'immigration65%
  2. L'EU73%
  3. L'ingérence Sioniste81%
  4. L'extrême gauche stream35%
  5. L'extrême droite stream25%
  6. Le socialisme économique44%

The shares total 323%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTCAnonymous Poll948 voters

Je suis :

  1. D'accord70%
  2. Pas d'accord7%
  3. Pas tout à fait d'accord25%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,604 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Golems Klub” (@golemsklub2), 12,567 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/golemsklub2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.