Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🐞Zoé Sagan officiel 🐞

Channel

🐞Zoé Sagan officiel 🐞

@zoesagan_officiel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,117subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002115035125
TypeChannel
Username@zoesagan_officiel
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zoesagan_officiel

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,11711,21111,1646 August 2026 — 11,204 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,206 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,204 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,200 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,201 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,200 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,202 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,207 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,206 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,211 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,208 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,206 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,208 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,203 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,205 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,204 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,202 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,192 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,187 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,185 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,181 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,178 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,172 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,166 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,156 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,144 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,135 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,131 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,130 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,117 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,103–11,225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:2111,117-13
16 Sept 2026, 05:1511,130-1
14 Sept 2026, 09:5711,131-4
12 Sept 2026, 18:5711,135-9
10 Sept 2026, 15:5711,144-12
7 Sept 2026, 13:2111,156-10
4 Sept 2026, 13:1811,166-6
3 Sept 2026, 01:3611,172-6
2 Sept 2026, 03:0411,178-3
1 Sept 2026, 05:0611,181-4
31 Aug 2026, 04:1411,185-2
30 Aug 2026, 03:0811,187-5
28 Aug 2026, 23:3611,192-10
27 Aug 2026, 21:0711,202-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:0311,204-1
26 Aug 2026, 00:2311,205+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:4811,203-5
23 Aug 2026, 03:4311,208+2
21 Aug 2026, 15:4911,206-2
20 Aug 2026, 17:5311,208first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.4%
avg views ÷ 11,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,050
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held24 (10 April 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total20,240
Reactions total942
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 09s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,438 reactions across 24 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮1,22816.5%
😈1,16215.6%
💩88011.8%
👍79810.7%
🤣7289.79%
🤬6558.81%
❤3504.71%
🔥3394.56%
👏2072.78%
🖕1351.82%
💊1241.67%
🙏1131.52%
🤡1121.51%
🤔1081.45%
😢941.26%
😡761.02%
😁700.941%
💯570.766%
👎330.444%
🙈250.336%
23 further kinds1441.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 06:06 UTC≈2,690 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @lextincteurvousrendralibres

Voici les noms nommés dans le cadre de l’affaire Epstein par Thomas Massie devant le sénat Jes Staley • Leon Black • Les Wexner • David Copperfield • Lapo Elkann • Tom Pritzker • Glenn Dubin • Frederic Fekkai • Eduardo Teodorani • Jean-Luc Brunel (he added that Brunel was “conveniently dead by suicide in prison”) • Daniel Siad (he added that Siad was “recently discovered dead in Paris”) • Ramsey Elkholy…

🔥65❤26👍15🤡3🌭1🐳1🤬1😈1

29 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC≈3,980 views159 reactionsread 3 September 2026

C'est tellement rare un journaliste qui se repent...

👍80🤔29🤬10👏9🤯7🤮5😈5💅4

29 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC≈3,560 views164 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @shahinhazamyPhoto

🔴🇮🇷🇬🇧 - Le journaliste irano-britannique Saeed Kamali Dehghan, exilé au Royaume-Uni et élu journaliste de l’année 2010 au Royaume-Uni, a avoué avoir menti et totalement inventé une interview publiée dans le célèbre journal britannique The Guardian, concernant la supposée condamnation à la « lapidation » d’une femme iranienne en Iran pour « adultère ». Une affaire qui avait fait grand bruit à l’époque et dont l’artic…

💊78🔥31💩13🙏11❤9🤔7😎5😁4

28 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈5,630 views276 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💩169🤮43💊30😈13🤣10🤡5❤4👍2

28 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈4,380 views230 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣205😁12❤7😈6

26 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈6,790 views363 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😈165🤮109🔥27😨16😡15🤬9💩8🖕7

1 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC≈9,930 views222 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @sansconcessionPhoto

Hommage aux victimes des bombardements alliés de Saint-Lô Dans ce reportage vidéo, vous pourrez revivre la cérémonie organisée le 25 juillet 2026 à Saint-Lô, avec les trois allocutions prononcées respectivement par Marc Tanneau de Haeck (à l’origine de ces cérémonies), Jacques et Vincent Reynouard. Les trois allocutions sont présentées avec les images adéquates afin d’en augmenter la pertinence. Une cérémonie impo…

👍128🙏60❤26👏4🖕4

16 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC≈12,800 views571 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤮242🤣223😈37🙈25💩14😁11🌭6🦄4

8 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈18,000 views580 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Macron sert la main des terroristes. Macron restitue 50 millions d'euros à la Syrie. Macron défèque sur les victimes du terrorisme.

🤬251🤮150💩85😈49💯13💊11❤9👀5

28 Jun 2026, 19:58 UTC≈15,700 views288 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @modesteschwartz

Prenez le maquis : constituez une bibliothèque papier ! https://share.google/HRrnq25gaEzJLQDEv

😢90😈81🤬63💯18🤔10❤9🤯9😱8

27 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC≈15,000 views296 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Microsoft veut implanter un data center dans le Haut-Rhin. La nappe phréatique et la zone natura 2000 sont directement menacées, de même que l'écosystème et la forêt plus que centenaire. Je vous conseille d'ailleurs de visiter la Petite Camargue alsacienne si vous passez dans le coin. https://www.change.org/p/refuser-l-implantation-d-un-datacenter-%C3%A0-petit-landau-68490

😈150🤬104🙏13❤10🔥8👎7😐4

24 Jun 2026, 21:10 UTC≈10,800 views304 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @sylviamiamiofficielPhoto

Post 🇫🇷 & 🇺🇸 🇫🇷🚨📣 SIONISME VS CHRÉTIENTÉ : LA RÉALITÉ SANS MASQUE Mardi 9 juin 2026, le village historique de Taybeh, habité depuis plus de 5 000 ans et dernier bastion 100 % chrétien de Palestine, a été la cible d'incendies criminels par des colons sionistes. Ces derniers ont mis le feu aux champs et lancé des cocktails Molotov contre les maisons. Alors qu'ils tentent de faire passer le sionisme pour un ami des chr…

😈158🤮59🤬37❤20💯10🔥6🙏5👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @zoesagan_officiel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

La Vérité Diffusée
@VeriteDiffusee · 74,061
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Neodia
@neodia · 48,385
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Aubontouitefrancais
@aubontouite_francais · 47,770
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Black Bond PTV ⚔️🦅😇
@StoryOfBlackBond · 44,793
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
▼ Le Grand Réveil / Liberta Press
@LeGrandReveil · 62,916
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Silvano Trotta Officiel
@trottasilvano · 122,214
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
STRATPOL
@stratpol · 71,321
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🐞Zoé Sagan officiel 🐞” (@zoesagan_officiel), 11,117 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zoesagan_officiel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.