Channel
@Noiregoutte
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
466subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001829076908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Noiregoutte |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Noiregoutte |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 466 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 466 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 22.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 21.2% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 11.7% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 8.03% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 6.57% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 5.11% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 5.11% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.92% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.92% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1873. Un 29 juin, une cinquantaine de députés français, au nom de 203 collègues, prononcent la consécration de la France au Sacré-Coeur de Jésus à Paray-le-Monial.
❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
😁11
29 juillet 1983 - Brigitte Simonetta nous annonçait, tout sourire, que la température avait atteint 42,6° à Saint-Raphaël. #caniculemoncul #secheressemoncul N'écoutez pas ceux qui agitent une prétendue menace climatique afin que vous renonciez de vous-même à vos libertés. pic.twitter.com/q47PMnWqSL
💯6👍3
Mon interprétation personnelle des prophéties catholiques (suite et fin) J'ai donc demandé à une IA de superposer deux cartes : celle de l'invasion supposée et celle localisant les principaux sites français de production d'armement, notamment les usines fabriquant des missiles, des drones et celles qui produisent des munitions à longue portée. Quelques observations visuelles ressortent de cette superposition. 1) L…
Mon interprétation personnelle des prophéties catholiques Jusqu'à présent, les cartes d'invasion élaborées à partir des prophéties de Marie-Julie Jahenny, de l'abbé Souffrant ou encore d'Alois Irlmaier m'étaient toujours appparues comme peu cohérentes. Pourquoi les forces russes n'emprunteraient-elles pas le vaste couloir des plaines d'Europe du Nord, qui constitue pourtant l'axe de progression le plus naturel vers…
👍2
En ces temps de mensonge généralisé, si vous voulez parler librement de la pluie et du beau temps, vous devez admettre qu'il vous faut d'abord changer de régime politique.
👏8
La grande semaine du réchauffement climatique est terminée ; effrayez-vous maintenant du refroidissement climatique qui arrive, avec son triste cortège nébuleux et pluvieux. L'essentiel, c'est de bien avoir peur, de bien se sentir coupable et de bien se censurer.
👏8💯1
L'église Saint-Pierre Le Jeune catholique, à Strasbourg.
❤🔥9
NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS : 1 NOUVEL APÔTRE IDENTIFIÉ Des ex élèves de Camondo ont travaillé à l'identification des apôtres restants Visage fermé en prière devant la pseudo 'Vierge Marie', c'est bien Aleister Crowley qui prend les traits de l'apôtre chauve et imberbe du vitrail phare de Notre-Dame de Paris. Père du satanisme moderne, vénéré par Manson, Aleister Crowley est le grand-père de la Manson Family, l'aïeul embléma…
🤬3🤮3🔥2✍1😱1
13 mai 1917, apparition de Notre Dame à Fatima. "A la fin, Mon Cœur immaculé triomphera !"
❤11🙏3
Nous serons bientôt faits comme des rats. https://www.cnews.fr/monde/2026-04-22/fin-du-code-4-chiffres-pour-les-cartes-bancaires-ce-quil-faut-savoir-sur-le
Trés vrai.
🥰7
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Noiregoutte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Avez-vous une bonne image d'Israel ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 29 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 853,277 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Noiregoutte 🇲🇫” (@Noiregoutte), 466 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Noiregoutte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.