Channel
@ReinfoFrance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
766subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001415072745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ReinfoFrance |
| Description | Une synthèse des meilleures analyses du moment pour contourner la censure de l'information. "A une époque de supercherie universelle, dire la vérité est un acte révolutionnaire." Georges Orwell - 1984 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ReinfoFrance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 766 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 766 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,039 |
| Reactions total | 162 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
162 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 93 | 57.4% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 9.26% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 8.02% | |
| 🤮 | 11 | 6.79% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 4.94% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 3.70% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
En 2023, un tour de passe-passe législatif a conduit à la disparition subreptice de la loi empêchant le changement de destination de terrain après un incendie pour dissuader les promoteurs de tous poils de mettre le feu: Jusqu’en 2023, l’article L.131-13 du Code forestier, issu de la loi Barnier de 2002, protégeait nos forêts incendiées en interdisant, pendant 30 ans, tout changement d’affectation des sols (construc…
🔥1
Pour ne pas oublier que nos choix politiques conditionnent notre vie quotidienne: Les dirigeants Français ont clairement fait le choix d'appauvrir leur concitoyens.
👍9
Le Financial Times effondre un mythe : l’immigration de masse n’est plus la solution automatique au vieillissement, aux pénuries de main-d’œuvre et au ralentissement de la croissance. L’économiste Oren Cass indique qu’elle fait grimper les prix du logement et décourage l’investissement et l'automatisation. À l’inverse, la rareté du travail stimule l'innovation, la productivité, améliore les salaires et les condition…
👌3
Ce n'est pas la première fois que le Maroc envoie ses délinquants envahir l'enclave espagnole: L’UE finance le Maroc à hauteur de 343 millions d’euros depuis 2018 pour contrôler ses frontières et contenir les flux migratoires vers l’Europe. Le Maroc instrumentalise ces flux comme arme géopolitique après l’accueil espagnol du chef du Polisario en avril 2021. Entre le 17 et le 18 mai 2021, plus de 8 000 clandestins mar…
👍4❤2
Installer un "deep state", organiser le chaos, puis laisser le RN accéder au pouvoir dans un contexte ingérable pour le décrédibiliser et revenir aux commandes dans 2 ans? Une hypothèse de plus en plus crédible sur la stratégie du système pour 2027: https://www.polemia.com/presidentielle-2027-radioscopie-dun-piege-a-cons/ "Les Français pourraient ainsi, une fois de plus, redevenir les figurants d’un scénario déjà éc…
👍6🤔1
Qui est derrière le Middle East Forum ? Créé en 1990 par Daniel Pipes (ancien fonctionnaire du département d'État américain), qui en est aujourd'hui le président/chairman. Le think tank est basé à Philadelphie. La direction opérationnelle est assurée par Gregg Roman, décrit par plusieurs sources critiques comme un ancien employé du ministère israélien de la Défense. Le MEF se définit comme un think tank conservateu…
🔥2👍1
Les dessous de la campagne américano-israélienne pour Ceuta et Melilla Depuis mars 2026, une série d'articles d'opinion publiés par des figures liées au think tank américain Middle East Forum a relancé la question du statut de Ceuta et Melilla, les deux enclaves espagnoles au nord du Maroc. Le 12 mars 2026, Michael Rubin, senior fellow à l'American Enterprise Institute, publie via le Middle East Forum un premier te…
👍2
Cette analyse du fiasco de l'incendie en Gironde pointe les dysfonctionnements graves des services publics : https://www.lemondemoderne.media/feu-de-gironde-tout-le-monde-ment/
👍5❤1
La suite logique de l'euthanasie est déjà prête : https://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/la-volonte-du-patient-s-arrete-a-la-loi-le-conseil-d-etat-valide-l-arret-des-traitements-d-un-malade-contre-son-avis-20260724
🤬8🔥3❤1
4 ans après, des champs de … panneaux ! Etonnant ... @la_nouvelle_france
🤮3🤯3👍2❤1
« La Révolution est l'exemple et la source, à la fois lointains et immédiats, du refus de la vie. Elle est l'origine exacte de la mort de la civilisation occidentale, une mort qui nous concerne tous. Quoi d'étonnant à cela ? La Révolution avait pour devise La Liberté ou la Mort, tel qu'on peut le lire sur ses en-têtes courants et sur les plaques émaillées de ses dignitaires*. Ayant très vite cessé d'être la Liberté, …
👍7🙏2🤔1
La spirale de la dette ne date pas d'hier: les rois ont enclenché dès le XIVème siècle ce mécanisme pernicieux, qui n'a fait que s'amplifier, pour financer guerres et avantages de castes. Or, l'histoire a montré que le cycle dette-dévaluation-inflation-impôt qui mène inévitablement à la faillite peut être enrayé par des réformes profondes. Mais le courage manquant à nos nouveaux monarques, ils y renoncent souvent pou…
👍8💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ReinfoFrance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
D'après vous, quelle proportion de la population française est encore dans le déni de la réalité?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,141,951 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Réinfo France 📣 actualités” (@ReinfoFrance), 766 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReinfoFrance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.