Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

غلوپژوهی

@gholoow2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

292subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002500701741
TypeChannel
Username@gholoow2
CreatedBetween 1 January 2025 and 13 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gholoow2

Growth

291292291.56 Aug 2026, 05:35 — 291 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:02 — 291 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:56 — 292 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 05:357 Aug 2026, 00:56
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 291–292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:56292+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:02291no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:35291first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2025, 11:36 UTC593 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

💐 نشيد للأطفال لفرحة الزهراء سلام الله عليها 🌹 متباركين بهلاك الطاغي الثاني اللعين

12 Aug 2025, 02:29 UTC790 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

این دو شخص (ع.الف، ع.ع) در کانال‌های خود 40حدیث درباره اینکه ائمه علیهم السلام علم غیب ندارند و به اکثر امور جاهلند قرار داده‌اند. در حدیث 43 مدعی‌اند امیرالمؤمنین علیه السلام درباره برخی اشخاص فریب خورده و آنها را نمیشناخت. توجه به قد و قواره این اشخاص بهتر نشان می‌دهد درباره چه چیزی و چرا اظهار نظر می‌کنند. فهرست نجاستخواری ها: https://t.me/gholoow2/310

12 Aug 2025, 02:28 UTC585 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kofromarPhoto

پست موقت نگارنده این پست، یک شیعه نما میباشد که این حدیث را بابت نسبت دادن جهل و فریب خوردگی به امیرالمومنین علیه السلام پست کرده است😡 ایشان چهار نفر اصلی بنام های عادل زاده و اکبری و خوروش و اسدالبرائه لعنت الله علیهم اجمعین هستند که برای اثبات علم غیب نداشتن معصومین علیهم السلام انواع و اقسام جهل، ندانستن و فریب خوردگی را به اهل البیت علیهم السلام نسبت میدهند. درحالی‌که تمام این شبهات را شیعیان به وهابیت پاسخ

13 Jul 2025, 07:25 UTC713 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

اسد پلاستیکی🦁 نتیجه استاد استاد گفتن به کسی که جنبش رو نداره همین میشه ❌استفاده از منابع شیعه و پاک بودن نسب اهل دنیا = دهن گشادی ✅استفاده از اخبار مشابه عمریه و کل خلق رو حاصل زنای با محارم خواندن = معذور آخه این سی سال دیگه هم تو لولی نیست که بخواد در مورد نمازی شاهرودی اینجوری حرف بزنه شاید از مباحث علم غیب نمازی سوخته داره عقدش رو اینجوری خالی میکنه 😁باور کن شما در مجامع علمی اصلا مطرح نیستی اسد جان

25 May 2025, 19:34 UTC893 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🔺 🔺 🔺 🎥 ویژه برنامه غلو پژوهی با موضوع علم غیب با اجرای : 🎙 عایشه اکبری و 🎙 حفصه عادلزاده 📡 پخش از شبکه وهابی کلمه #حنجره_إبلیس #غلوپژوهان

22 May 2025, 18:57 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🔴 شاگردان إبلیس و شبهات مشترک #حنجره_إبلیس #غلوپژوهان حنجره پیشین: https://t.me/gholoow2/373

21 May 2025, 05:54 UTC≈2,660 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

وحدت کلمه، با شبکه کلمه عینیت اشکالات غلوپژوهان و وهابی‌ها واقعا چه نیازی بود که غلوپژوهان تازه سر برآورده، اینهمه زحمت بکشند برای بازنشر شبهات هم‌مسلکان وهابی‌شان؟! وقتی صدها سال است که سلفیه و وهابیت همین شبهات را گفته و‌ شیعه پاسخ داده! شاید لازم بود مثل قرآنیون این‌ شبهات از زبان مدعیان دروغین تشیع خارج شود! عجیب است که غلوپژوهان با بی‌انصافی تمام کلمات علما را که اثبات علم غیب به نحو تعلیمی کرده‌اند را با عنو

20 May 2025, 08:56 UTC719 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

نفرین وهابی مسلکان غلوپژوه در حرم سید الشهداء علیه السلام پاره‌‌‌ای از عقاید این افراد: https://t.me/gholoow2/313

19 May 2025, 22:48 UTC609 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

نفرین وهابی مسلکان غلوپژوه در حرمین عسکرین علیهما السلام پاره‌‌‌ای از عقاید این افراد: https://t.me/gholoow2/313

18 May 2025, 21:52 UTC700 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

نفرین وهابی‌مسلکان غلوپژوه در آسمان! پاره‌‌‌ای از عقاید این افراد: https://t.me/gholoow2/313

18 May 2025, 17:25 UTC932 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

نفرین وهابی مسلکان غلوپژوه در حرم مولای متقیان، امیرالمؤمنین علیه السلام این وهابی‌منش‌ها معتقدند گفتن ذکر یاعلی، و ایستادن رو به ضریح، و طلب حاجت از حضرت خلاف شرع است پاره‌‌ دیگری از عقاید این افراد: https://t.me/gholoow2/313

18 May 2025, 09:47 UTC647 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

این از نحوه ترجمه کردن اشتباهت، این از اغلاط املاییت، به چی مینازی اسد پلاستیکی؟! فقط بلدی انکار علم غیب داشتن اهل بیت رو بکنی؟ هر روز یک گند جدید بالا میاری، چرا سکوت نمیکنی؟! نکنه هک شدی؟

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gholoow2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 144,802 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“غلوپژوهی” (@gholoow2), 292 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gholoow2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.