Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Formae Mentis

Channel

Formae Mentis

@formaementis

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,996subscribers

+109 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001026180480
TypeChannel
Username@formaementis
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/formaementis

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,85919,02818,943.55 August 2026 — 18,887 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,887 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,884 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,891 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,890 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,881 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,872 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,862 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,859 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,863 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,872 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,874 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,873 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,887 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,892 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,900 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,905 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,913 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,942 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,959 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,956 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,967 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,955 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,959 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,962 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,005 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,016 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,015 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,028 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,016 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,003 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,002 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,993 subscribers26 September 2026 — 18,996 subscribers18,9965 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,834–19,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 22:3718,996+3
19 Sept 2026, 17:5518,993-9
17 Sept 2026, 07:5719,002-1
15 Sept 2026, 06:5919,003-13
13 Sept 2026, 12:5919,016-12
11 Sept 2026, 19:1719,028+13
9 Sept 2026, 06:5619,015-1
6 Sept 2026, 02:1819,016+11
3 Sept 2026, 20:1519,005+43
2 Sept 2026, 11:1118,962+3
1 Sept 2026, 07:4418,959+4
31 Aug 2026, 04:5318,955-12
30 Aug 2026, 06:4718,967+11
29 Aug 2026, 03:3818,956-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:5418,959+17
26 Aug 2026, 07:5818,942+29
24 Aug 2026, 04:5818,913+8
22 Aug 2026, 11:2418,905+5
21 Aug 2026, 04:0618,900+8
20 Aug 2026, 03:3818,892first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.81%
avg views ÷ 18,996 subscribers
Avg views / post
915
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held83 (26 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total9,146
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 35s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

454 reactions across 72 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29164.1%
❤14832.6%
👏102.20%
🤔20.441%
👎10.22%
🔥10.22%
🤩10.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 83 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @formaementis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 05:10 UTC429 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Le parole possono mentire, il corpo NO! Hai mai avuto la sensazione che qualcuno non stesse dicendo tutta la verità? Anche se le parole sembravano sincere. Anche se il tono era calmo. Anche se il contesto era formale. Quella sensazione non era intuizione. Era il tuo cervello che aveva registrato un’incongruenza. Prima che tu potessi nominarla. 👉 https://formaementis.net/le-parole-possono-mentire-il-corpo-no/

👍6

2 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC864 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐧 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐞: 𝐋𝐚 𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚̀ 𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐛𝐮𝐠𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨 Nel linguaggio del corpo, l'indice puntato è un "illustratore" aggressivo. Chi mente lo usa spesso per: 1️⃣ Sottolineare con forza una bugia per renderla più credibile 2️⃣ Spostare l'attenzione da sé all'interlocutore (attacco come difesa) 3️⃣ Convincere razionalmente quando l'emozione manca di sincerità Ma attenzione: un singolo gesto non è mai una prova …

👍5

2 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC461 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

LINGUA. ENERGIA. ALCHIMIA. Dove ti guido a trovare la tua libertà di esprimerti in inglese. ENTRA nel canale 👉 ingleseolistico

2 Sept 2026, 06:19 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Corso online su telegram: Linguaggio del corpo La teoria non diventa competenza. Solo la ripetizione quotidiana lo fa. Il 7 Settembre inizia 6 Mesi Senza Scuse 1 contenuto operativo al giorno. Casi reali. Verifica finale. Iscrizioni aperte fino al 5 Settembre 👉 https://formaementis.net/corso-6-mesi-senza-scuse/

1 Sept 2026, 18:04 UTC491 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

TERZO MILLENNIO Canale di Resistenza, diffusione e rilancio delle notizie. Il nuovo millennio nasce sotto una cattiva stella e le sfide che si parano davanti all'umanità paiono insormontabili. Una Nuova Resistenza è urgente e necessaria. SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS Unisciti su Telegram https://t.me/terzomillennioanni20 Unisciti su X https://x.com/3thMillennio

1 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 3 September 2026

Ogni giorno su instagram, un Reel sul linguaggio del corpo o una Storia sulla comunicazione non verbale Seguici: ♨️ Formaementis 👇👇👇 https://www.instagram.com/formaementis/ Ti aspettiamo! ❤️

1 Sept 2026, 05:36 UTC≈1,330 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

La risposta corretta è: C) Mediorientale ✅ Spiegazione scientifica: Nel contesto della comunicazione non verbale interculturale, il gesto del pollice alzato, comunemente interpretato in molti Paesi occidentali come segno di approvazione o di “ok”, può assumere significati molto diversi in altre aree del mondo. 📍 Medio Oriente: In alcuni Paesi del Medio Oriente (come Iran, Afghanistan, e parti dell’Iraq), il gesto d…

👍5👏3❤1👎1

31 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,220 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ti hanno fatto credere che fosse colpa tua Che "forse non eri abbastanza". Che "avresti dovuto capire prima". Che "in fondo qualcosa avrai sbagliato". È una bugia Il tradimento non nasce da ciò che manca nella coppia. Nasce da ciò che manca nella struttura emotiva di chi tradisce. È un bisogno patologico. Una ferita infantile non risolta. Un fallimento strutturale del traditore — non tuo. "Quante notti hai passato…

❤5

31 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC931 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🔤🅰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🅰️🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🅰️🔤🔤🔤🅰️ ➡️ Ricerche scientifiche da tutto il mondo ➡️ Materiali completamente tradotti in italiano ➡️ Documentari e approfondimenti da tutto il mondo ➡️ Testi e video a tema ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ L'UNICO CANALE CHE VI FARÀ VEDERE QUANTO È PROFONDA LA TANA DEL BIANCONIGLIO. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 👇UNITEVI E DIVULGATE I VIDEO👇 📱https://t.me/lanuovanormalita📱

❤2

31 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,160 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ti hanno fatto credere che fosse colpa tua 👉 Che "forse non eri abbastanza" 👉 Che "avresti dovuto capire prima" 👉Che "in fondo qualcosa avrai sbagliato" È una bugia Il tradimento non nasce da ciò che manca nella coppia Nasce da ciò che manca nella struttura emotiva di chi tradisce È un bisogno patologico. Una ferita infantile non risolta. Un fallimento strutturale del traditore — non tuo. Ma tu lo sapevi? No.…

❤2👍2

30 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,380 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐠𝐠𝐢𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐩𝐨: 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐥𝐚 𝐭𝐮𝐚 𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐚 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐞 🧠 Le persone decidono cosa pensare di te… prima ancora che tu finisca di parlare Una postura Uno sguardo Un sorriso La distanza che mantieni Il corpo comunica continuamente, anche quando resti in silenzio E spesso sono proprio questi segnali invisibili a determinare: ✔️ fiducia ✔️ attrazione sociale ✔️ autorevolezza ✔️ connessione emotiva Ma attenzione …

👍3❤2

30 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,270 views4 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

𝐒𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐢 𝐝𝐢 𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢 𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐮𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐳𝐞. 𝑆𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑖 𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑙 𝑡𝑢𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜, 𝑖𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑖 𝑡𝑢: 𝑒̀ 𝑙𝑎 𝑡𝑢𝑎 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑎. Ognuno di noi decide ogni giorno. Non esistono persone che non decidono, esistono solo persone che decidono con difficoltà e che ignorano i vantaggi secondari nascosti dietro ogni obiettivo mancato. Il cambiamento avviene naturalmente, ma il miglioramento dipende solo da te…

❤2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @formaementis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🧠💡Accendi La Mente🔌💥
@accendilamente · 41,434
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
Libri PDF Gratis ITA
@libri_pdf_gratis · 87,743
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 August 2026
🧠 Sapiens³
@sapiens3 · 26,997
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
Aforismi e Citazioni
@aforismiecitazioni · 35,547
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
🎙 AudioBook Italia 🇮🇹
@AudiolibriFreeCopyrite · 28,265
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
DeepWeb
@DeepWebITA · 56,555
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026
Planet 🌍
@pianetafantastico · 24,484
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 September 2026
Le foto del passato
@lefotodelpassato · 61,235
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Formae Mentis” (@formaementis), 18,996 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/formaementis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.