Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Девичья фамилия

@femlobby

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,524subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001524807222
TypeChannel
Username@femlobby
Created8 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/femlobby

Growth

2,5212,5242,522.56 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,523 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,521–2,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:182,524+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:432,523+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:572,522+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:162,521no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:462,521first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.0%
avg views ÷ 2,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,757
Reactions total645
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,619 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
83231.8%
💯55921.3%
🤬42216.1%
💔1967.48%
🔥1535.84%
🤡1315.00%
🤯823.13%
👍632.41%
👏612.33%
😭301.15%
🤔220.84%
🤣180.687%
🤨120.458%
👎110.42%
🗿90.344%
🥰70.267%
🕊40.153%
💋30.115%
😱20.076%
😐10.038%
1 further kind10.038%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,619reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC737 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня я узнала, что в московских частных клиниках приём детского психиатра стоит 15-20 тысяч рублей. 15 — это в немодных, у психиатра без регалий. Как легко и удобно пользоваться тем, что мать боится, что по ОМС ребёнка «поставят на учет»! Представляю, с каким удовольствием за 20 косарей в час можно поголовно диагностировать детям СДВГ, ведь специфических симптомов у этого диагноза нет. Можно еще аутизм за каждый

🔥54💯24🤬1613🕊4😭2

27 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC≈1,580 views193 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пиарщики метро боятся слова «машинистки». Я даже знаю, почему: «патамушта машинистка — это которая печатает на печатной машинке». Ну, знаете, в 1993 году, до появления ПК-бояр. Да забудьте уже этот историзм и переприсвойте название профессии. Машинистка — это та, кто водит поезд. Она не «машинист» и не «женщина-машинист». Не чувствуют язык точно так же, как с суффиксом «-ш[а]».

129💯33👏26👍5

24 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,870 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Горжусь знакомством, качество гарантирую, горячо рекомендую книгу Эльвиры https://t.me/ikseluikgorodu/745

🔥4217

24 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,570 views280 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @optimismequation

Допустим, есть условный Дмитрий. У него есть аккаунт в Фейсбуке. Дмитрий может выражать свое мнение. Его мнение о работающих женщинах такое: «Женщинам бы только бумажки перекладывать в офисе. На стройках, в шахтах, в автосервисах женщин не встретить. Зачем пачкать руки о тяжелую работу, когда можно сложить губки бантиком, рассказать, какая ты лапа и что тебе обязательно нужно стать директором?» Он не знает о списке з

134💯108🤬28💔6👍2🔥2

5 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC≈1,870 views114 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lisa_lisistrata

Женщин медикализируют и назначают препараты из психофармакологии даже по причинам, не связанным с психиатрией. Есть даже термин «медикализацией женского тела и репродуктивных функций» (medicalization of women's bodies). Это процесс, при котором естественные биологические процессы (менструальный цикл, менопауза, послеродовой период) или соматические симптомы (например, хроническая боль) трактуются как «психические деф

53🤬48💯5🗿5👎1💔1🤡1

1 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,090 views186 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @labour_gender_naturePhoto

Ну и про психологические проблемы: Joanna Macy рассказывает нескольку комичную историю, как она поделилась с психотерапевткой своим возмущением по поводу вырубки древних лесов и чувством безнадежности, с этим связанным. Однако, специалистка тут же попыталась все свести к частному неврозу: согласно ее интерпретации, бульдозеры представляют собой либидо, а чувство отчаяния - страх перед собственной сексуальностью. Кла

🤡128🤯33🤬25

16 Jun 2026, 04:50 UTC≈2,820 views182 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @govoryakakvzroslaya

Ты хочешь, чтоб тебе оторвали голову, или ехать на дачу? В «Подкидыше» героиня Раневской задает девочке этот вопрос. Один вариант абсурден и невозможен, а второй уже выбран. Возможность выбирать сохраняется в грамматике, хотя исчезает в самой ситуации. Когда женщины в интервью рассказывают о своей жизни, они часто говорят про выбор. Выбрала семью и детей, выбрала не делать карьеру, выбрала терпеть, выбрала уйти, вы

💯14531👍4🤡2

12 Jun 2026, 12:21 UTC≈2,990 views226 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тред немецкой докторки об афганских беженцах Как многие из вас, наверное, помнят, пару лет назад я работала в институте судебной медицины, и, помимо ежедневных вскрытий трупов и обследования жертв насилия, у нас была ещё одна функция. Ведомства по делам иностранцев разных федеральных земель раз в неделю привозили нам мужчин-беженцев из Афганистана, которым якобы было по 16 лет и у которых не было при себе документов

💔130🤯49🤬42💯32

2 Jun 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,780 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychopathology_chan

Свежее исследование в Acta Neuropsychiatrica о диагностических критериях #СДВГ из DSM-5-TR. Szymaniak K, Bell E, Shivakumar G, Malhi GS. Breaking down the ADHD construct to build a valid diagnosis. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2026 May 22:1-41. Критика критериев DSM-5-TR: 1) Возраст начала расстройства (12 лет) выбран без эмпирического обоснования (в DSM-IV было 7 лет). 2) Пороги симптомов (≥6 для детей, ≥5 для взрослых,

73💯19🔥16

25 May 2026, 20:40 UTC≈3,310 views180 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поймали инопланетяне мужика, решили узнать, что у него в черепной коробке. Залезли, а там пустота и веревочка натянута от уха к уху. Инопланетяне разрезали веревочку, у мужика уши и отвалились. #анекдот Мужчине очень легко ни о чем не думать. Это у женщины семеро по лавкам и бесконечная «ментальная нагрузка» в голове: всякая административная фигня в придачу к основной работе, график прививок для каждого ребёнка, сп

93👏35💯26🤣15🗿4😭4👎3

25 May 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,270 views145 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Осуждение поступков женщин, но не самих женщин» Это вот так что ли: «*******а не тупая, она просто пишет тупое*. *Все имена и события выдуманы, совпадение с реальными людьми случайно» Ну как, стала эта фраза менее мизогинной и оскорбительной из-за оскорбления поступка, а не женщины? То-то же. В чат входят авторы насилия, а не насильники, потому что мы осуждаем поступки, а не мужчин. Прямо как в современной педа

104🔥22🤨7🥰7👎2🤣2👍1

25 May 2026, 11:28 UTC≈2,000 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026

вообще, когда я поняла, что психиатрия и психотерапия в каком-то смысле такого же рода капиталистический институт, направленный на получение сверхприбылей за счет людей, как та же бьюти-индустрия, для меня многое прояснилось. https://t.me/bbbreaking/230169

👍51💯143🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @femlobby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 841,991 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Девичья фамилия” (@femlobby), 2,524 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/femlobby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.