Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Софья Ребрей о фем. экономике

@fem_eco

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

988subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001737409602
TypeChannel
Username@fem_eco
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fem_eco

Growth

988989988.56 August 2026 — 989 subscribers6 August 2026 — 989 subscribers13 August 2026 — 988 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 988–989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:16988-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:19989no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:17989first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 988 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (7 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,995
Reactions total210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

381 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23260.9%
💯4612.1%
🤬379.71%
🔥236.04%
💔102.62%
🤣82.10%
❤‍🔥71.84%
61.57%
👍51.31%
👏20.525%
😭20.525%
😱20.525%
🍓10.262%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Новости феминистской экономики Несколько свежих работ, которые я положила себе в закладки. Marriage, Menarche, and Agency: Understanding Women’s Outcomes in Indonesia Syed Hassan Raza, Uswa Tun Nabi Авторы изучают связь между возрастом наступления первой менструации (менархе), вступлением в брак и последующими результатами жизни женщин в Индонезии. Исследование показывает, что время этих событий связано с дальней

2

Signed Sofia Rebrey

5 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC160 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

История Маргарет и Рейчел Макмиллан, благодаря которым дети не учатся голодными. Очередной пример, как женщины в разных сферах повышают качество заботы, представляя интересы ВСЕГО общества и в первую очередь детей.

25🔥6

Signed Sofia Rebrey

5 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC155 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Выступила на конференции НИУ ВШЭ среди социологов. Обсуждали агентность и заботу. Вечный страх сторонников патриархата - если прекратить угнетать женщин, они перестанут рожать и заботиться, а будут жить ДЛЯ СЕБЯ! Я с этой идеей категорически не согласна. Женщины заботились и рожали тысячи лет до создания патриархата. А расширение прав и возможностей женщин (рост женской агетностности) приводит к росту качества забот

25🔥5

Signed Sofia Rebrey

5 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC226 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Хан Бен Чхоль в своем Обществе усталости полагает, что хваленая многозадачность - это атрибут не сверхчеловека, а животного. Животные всегда находятся в состоянии бей или беги, всегда настороженно мониторят окрестности на предмет опасности. Неважно, животное ест или занимается сексом, оно все равно не полностью отдается процессу. В этом состоянии невозможно созерцать - о чем то глубоко задуматься, творить. Это, мне к

36💔6

Signed Sofia Rebrey

28 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC308 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rbc_news

Одна из причин, почему мировой спад рождаемости усугубляется, — несоответствие (mismatch) ценностных установок у женщин и мужчин. К такому выводу пришла лауреат Премии по экономике памяти Альфреда Нобеля 2023 года Клаудия Голдин из США. В статье, посвященной «росту женской автономии» (опубликована в июле 2026 года Национальным бюро экономических исследований США), Голдин пишет, что женщины выступают агентами перемен

15

Signed Sofia Rebrey

28 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC461 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Дорогие коллеги присылают новость о новой статье К. Голдин (с цитатой моего научного консультанта, кстати) и интересуется, не из моей ли докторской Голдин берет мои идеи. Ведь именно об этом я и пишу. Еще в 2023 г. мы с коллегами опубликовали статью об актуальных инструментах стимулирования рождаемости, где доказали на эмпирических данных, что самыми эффективным инструментом выступает вовлеченное отцовство. О нем у

36

Signed Sofia Rebrey

27 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC326 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @women_of_sciencePhoto

#новости_недели 🇯🇵 Первая в истории Японии: мэр ушла в декретный отпуск Мэр города Явата (префектура Фукуока) Сёко Кавата стала первой в истории Японии действующей главой муниципалитета, ушедшей в декретный отпуск. Это событие вызвало широкий резонанс и острую дискуссию в обществе. Кавата, которой сейчас 35 лет, стала самой молодой женщиной-мэром Японии в 2023 году. Её декрет продлится около двух месяцев до родов (о

18

Signed Sofia Rebrey

26 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC325 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

С легкой руки Мальтуса борьбу с бедностью приравняли к уменьшению рождаемости. Очень логично - меньше бедных, меньше бедности. В Индии эта идея реализовавалсь масштабно. Одна из самый бедных и самых многонаселенных стран. Правда меры Ганди были очень прогрессивными и гуманными - бесплатная контрацепция, планирование семьи, женское образование. Они не давали быстрого эффекта, потому что демография так устроена - изм

17🤬106😭2🍓1

Signed Sofia Rebrey

14 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC550 views58 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Читаем с детьми детские рассказы Зощенко из списка литературы на лето про умных животных, умных и храбрых детей - и девочек, и мальчиков. Вот где начинается социальная справедливость и понимание свобод - с сюжетов про ум и волю животных, как курица бесстрашно набросилась на собаку, защищая цыпленка, как гусь придумал размочить корку хлеба в луже. В андроцентричной картине мира животные существуют, для того, чтобы чел

39❤‍🔥7🔥7👍5

Signed Sofia Rebrey

10 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC601 views68 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Молодой человек сделал калькулятор, сколько вы должны своей маме. Комментарии убивают. Почему обществу так невыносимо, когда кто-то пытается повесить ценник на бесценный труд матери? Причем, в этот калькулятор не включены беременность и кормление грудью (можно посчитать используя рыночные цены на суррогатное материнство и грудное молоко), издержки здоровья матери, стоимость услуги няни 24/7, уборщицы, специалиста по

💯4613🔥5💔4

Signed Sofia Rebrey

7 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC548 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#гениальные_мужчины

🤣86👏2

Signed Sofia Rebrey

7 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC545 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Угадайте, в каком году в Италии отменили закон, согласно которому насильник мог избежать уголовного наказания, женившись на своей жертве (тоже насильно, разумеется)?

  1. 18916%
  2. 193712%
  3. 198183%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤬27😱2

Signed Sofia Rebrey

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @fem_eco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz173 voters

Угадайте, в каком году в Италии отменили закон, согласно которому насильник мог избежать уголовного наказания, женившись на своей жертве (тоже насильно, разумеется)?

  1. 18916%
  2. 193712%
  3. 198183%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 339,041 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Софья Ребрей о фем. экономике” (@fem_eco), 988 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fem_eco.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.