Channel
@ekmnlekh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
338subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003603835579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ekmnlekh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ekmnlekh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 338 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 337 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 337 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,426 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 33.3% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌿 इतरांनी आपल्याला समजून घेणं न घेणं हे त्यांच्यावर सोडा... 🥀 परंतू आधी स्वतःला किती समजावून घेतलं हे महत्त्वाचे... 🫶🏻💭 कारण जग फक्त आपल्याला स्वार्थापुरते समजून घेते... 💔 पण स्वतः स्वतःला समजून घेतलं तर कोणाकडून कोणतीही अपेक्षा करायची गरज नाही... 🕊️✨ @Writer_sonya ✍🏻🥀
👍3
आदिवासी समाज आणि भारतीय संस्कृती.. (९ऑगस्ट जागतिक आदिवासी दिनानिमित्त विशेष लेख ) “खरतर आदिवासी समाज ही आपल्या भारताची मूळ ओळख मानल्या जाते..हजारो वर्षांपूर्वी प्रत्येक माणूस आदिवासीच होता.. तो जंगलात राहत होता फळं, कंदमुळे खात होता आणि आपलं जीवन जगत होता..पुढे ह्या परिस्थितीमध्ये खूप बदल झाले.. आणि आजचा आधुनिक मानव साकारला गेला..हे खर असलं तरी आजही असंख्य आदिवासी माणसं जंगलात राहतात जल, जंगल, प्राणी, पक्षी हेच त्या…
परिस्थिती माणसाला कधीच कमजोर बनवत नाही, तर आपण त्या परिस्थितीशी कसा लढा देतो, ती संघर्षाची वाटच आपल्याला मजबूत आणि यशस्वी बनवते! जर तुमच्याकडेही आज साधनांची कमतरता असेल, तर रडत बसू नका. कष्टाला आपली ताकद बनवा, यश नक्कीच तुमचे असेल. संघर्षाची वाट' — रस्त्यावरच्या दिव्याखाली अभ्यास करून IAS बनलेल्या रोहनची जिद्दी कथा. कष्टाला पर्याय नाही हे सांगणारी मराठी गोष्ट नक्की वाचा! https://motivationmarathi2026.blogspot.com/2…
पुस्तक बंद केल्यानंतरही जर एखादा विचार मनातून जात नसेल, तर समजावं— आपण पुस्तक वाचलेलं नसतं, पुस्तकाने आपल्याला वाचलेलं असतं. @rutuja_writes1203
👍1
आई... सर्वामध्ये असूनही ती एकटी बसली आहे... कळेना मलाही तिला कोणती भीती आहे... दुःख ऐकून सर्वांचे ती त्यास सावरत आहे... तरीही मनाच्या गुंत्यात ती एकटीच का वावरत आहे... बंधन तोडून जगाचे कधी, मनासारखं वागशील गं... दुसऱ्यांच्या नव्हे तर स्वतःला स्वत:हाच्या नजरेतून कधी पाहशील गं... थोडीशी चिडचिड अन भरपूर काळजी करते... रागावून लेकरांना स्वतःच ती रडते... ती खुश रहावी एवढीच माझी प्रार्थना... थोड सावर तू आई स्वतःलाही, …
❤2
_*शहरात ताण घालवायला थेरपी लागते, गावात जुन्या दोस्ताचा एकच खळखळून हसलेला चेहरा पुरेसा असतो!*_
जे आपल्याकडे आहे त्यात आनंदाने जगायला शिका कारण आपण जसं जगत असतो तसं जगण्याचं कित्येकांच स्वप्न असतं पण या जगात परिपूर्ण सुखी असा एकही व्यक्ती नाही मात्र ज्या माणसाच्या जीवनात सुखाची सावली कधी पडली नाही त्यांच्या चेहऱ्यावर हमकास समाधान बघायला मिळत बाकी जे नाही त्याचं दुःख करण्यापेक्षा जे काही आपल्याकडे आहे त्यात समाधाने जगणं खूप महत्त्वाचं असतं!,,,✍🏻 एकमन#लेखक @Ommshelke
काही पुस्तकं आपण निवडतो, आणि काही पुस्तकं आपल्याला शोधून काढतात. योगायोग इतकाच असतो की, त्या वेळी आपल्याला त्यांची गरज असते. @rutuja_writes1203
_*आयुष्यात आनंदी रहायचं असेल तर कळून न कळल्या सारखं वागायचं असतं.*_
Photo, posted without a caption
कौतुक अति पण करुन चालत नाही बरं..नाहीतर समोरची व्यक्ती हुरळुन जाण्याची शक्यता असते. कौतुकामागे प्रशंसा तर असतेच पण ज्याने खरंच त्या व्यक्तिचा पुढे जाऊन तोटा होणार आहे अशा थोड्याफार चुकांची जाणीवही त्या व्यक्तिला करुन देणे योग्य ठरते. दुसरी बाजु अशीही कुणी आपल्याला Appreciate करावं म्हणुन कोणतीही गोष्ट करु नये तर ती आपल्या मनाच्या समाधानासाठी करावी. प्रत्येकवेळी कुणीतरी आपलं कौतुक करावं..आपल्याला छान म्हणावं ही अपेक्ष…
❤3👍1
मानवी नातेसंबंधावर, आणि थोडं-बहुत त्यामधील भावनांचा चढ-ऊतार तसंच नात्यांमध्ये वाढत चाललेला व्यावहारिकतेचा कडुपणा असं काहीतरी लिहिलं की मला काहीजण लग्गेच रिप्लाय करतात काय झालंय? काय घडलंय का? मुळात लिहिण्याची आवड असल्यामुळे मी ब-याच विषयांवर लिहित राहते याचा अर्थ मी लिहिलेला प्रत्येक विषय माझ्या आयुष्याशी रिलेट होतो असं मुळीच नसतं. हां तो योगायोगाने काहींच्या आयुष्याशी रिलेट होतो आणि त्यांना तो लेख आपलासा वाटतो. त्या…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ekmnlekh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 134,268 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“एक ❣️ पाऊल स्कारात्मकतेकडे💯” (@ekmnlekh), 338 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekmnlekh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.