Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 10 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 32 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 10 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Marathi_Motivation_7. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 10 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,883–5,972 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 09:10
5,893
-3
8 Nov 2026, 01:01
5,896
-2
5 Nov 2026, 06:27
5,898
-4
1 Nov 2026, 19:30
5,902
-15
29 Oct 2026, 15:58
5,917
-1
27 Oct 2026, 01:40
5,918
-5
24 Oct 2026, 01:11
5,923
-9
21 Oct 2026, 02:16
5,932
+3
18 Oct 2026, 01:47
5,929
-4
14 Oct 2026, 19:26
5,933
-5
11 Oct 2026, 20:36
5,938
-4
5 Oct 2026, 05:41
5,942
-10
27 Sept 2026, 03:02
5,952
+2
18 Sept 2026, 01:37
5,950
-1
13 Sept 2026, 18:40
5,951
+1
10 Sept 2026, 08:15
5,950
-4
5 Sept 2026, 08:41
5,954
-1
1 Sept 2026, 02:27
5,955
+3
29 Aug 2026, 07:18
5,952
+2
25 Aug 2026, 23:07
5,950
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 5,893 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.644%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
41 (2 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
29,861
Reactions total
192
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 02:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
403 reactions across 40 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
318
78.9%
👍
60
14.9%
👌
14
3.47%
🔥
7
1.74%
😍
1
0.248%
😢
1
0.248%
🤩
1
0.248%
🥰
1
0.248%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🌅 " आजचे सुविचार "
1) व्यक्तीचा आनंद ओळखू नाही आला तरी चालेल, पण त्याच्या वेदना वाचता आल्या पाहिजेत...! कारण आनंद अगदी सहज शब्दात व्यक्त होतो, पण दुःखाला व्यक्त होण्यासाठी शब्द सापडत नाहीत.
2) काही रस्ते हे नेहमी एकट्यानेच पार करावे लागतात. आयुष्यात येणाऱ्या एकटेपणाला कधीही घाबरु नका, कारण बऱ्याचदा हाच कठीण आणि एकांतवासाचा काळ तुम्हाला तुमच्या स्वतःच्या खऱ्या ताकदीची ओळख करून देतो. फक्त ईश्वरावर विश्वास ठेवा. सगळे …
🌅 " आजचे सुविचार "
1) बोलून दाखवायचं नाही फक्त लक्षात ठेवायचं कोण आपल्याशी कसं वागतोय. कारण वाईट बोलून वाईट होण्यापेक्षा शांत राहणे केव्हाही चांगलं. लोक खोटे बोलून माणसे जिंकतात आणि आपण मात्र खरं बोलून सगळ्यांपासून दूर राहतो.
2) प्रत्येकाला ज्याच्या त्याच्या परीने सुखही आहे आणि दु:खही आहे, दुस-याच्या नशिबाची बरोबरी आपल्या नशिबाशी करत बसू नका आपलं सुख कशात आहे हे शोधा आणि ते वाढवण्याचा प्रयत्न करा जगी सर्व सुखी असा…
दुसऱ्याला नाव ठेवणं खूप सोप असतं मात्र आपलं स्थान दुसऱ्याच्या मनात निर्माण करण खूप अवघड असतं म्हणून दुसऱ्या बद्दल गैरसमज करून घेऊ नका आपुलकीचं बीज पेरून माणुसकीची बाग फुलवा कारण शेवटी माणूसच माणसाच्या कामात येते त्याने निर्माण केलेली कुठलीच गोष्ट नाही✍🏻
एकमन#लेखक
@Omsmshelke
🌅 " आजचे सुविचार "
1) आनंदी राहण्याचा अर्थ असा नाही की सर्व काही चांगलं आहे, याचा अर्थ हा आहे की तुम्ही तुमच्या दुःखापेक्षा उंच होऊन जगणं शिकलात.
2) जबाबदारीने नातं टिकवा. जबरदस्तीने नाही.
3) आपलेपणा, आधार, आणि वेळ ही खूप मोठी संपत्ती आहे. कुणालाही देण्यासाठी यापेक्षा चांगली भेटवस्तू नाही.
•┈┈••✦✿✦•♥️•✦✿✦••┈┈•
❝ ♥️शब्द मनाचे♥️ ❞
Join👉@shabdamanache
•┈┈••✦✿✦•♥️•✦✿✦••┈┈•
🌅 " आजचे सुविचार "
1) आलेल्या अनुभवाने शिकवलंय, लोकांना तितकंच आपलं माना, जितकं ते तुम्हाला मानतात.
2) लोकांचं ऐका, त्यांना समजून घ्या, पण स्वतःच्या मनालाही किंमत द्या. कारण दुसऱ्यांसाठी जगताना स्वतःलाच हरवून बसणं, ही सेवा नाही स्वतःवर केलेला अन्याय आहे.
3) नाती जपण्यासाठी वेळ, प्रेम, जिव्हाळा आणि संवाद आवश्यक असतात, झाडांना जसं पाणी लागतं, तसंच नात्यांना आपुलकी.
•┈┈••✦✿✦•♥️•✦✿✦••┈┈•
❝ ♥️शब्द मनाचे♥️ ❞
Join👉@…
हल्ली ना आपल्या जगण्याचा दर्जा दुसऱ्याच्या म्हणण्यानुसार ठरत असतो आणि त्यानुसार आपण आपल्या जीवनात उगाच ताण वाढवून घेत असतो लोकांनी तर देवमाणसांना नाव ठेवली आहेत आपण तर काहीच नाही म्हणून म्हणतोय परिस्थिती कशी का असेना आपण स्वतःला एवढ आनंदी ठेवलं पाहिजे की सोमरच्या माणसाला आपल्याकडे बघून स्वतःच दुःख विसरता आलं पाहिजे कारण तुलना करणे हा जरी माणसाचा स्वभाव असला तरी स्वतःला सकारात्मक ठेवणं नेहेमीच आपल्या हातात असते राव!,,…
🌅 " आजचे सुविचार "
1) प्रत्येकाला आपले कर्म माहित असतात, विनाकारण गंगेच्या काठी गर्दी होत नाही.
2) आनंदाचा स्त्रोत तर स्वतःजवळ आहे. अन्यत्र त्याचा शोध घेणे केवळ व्यर्थ आहे.
3) एका वयानंतर माणसाला महागडे कपडे, मोठी गाडी आणि दिखावा नको असतो, फक्त उत्तम आरोग्य, खरी नाती आणि मनाची शांतता हवी असते...!!
•┈┈••✦✿✦•♥️•✦✿✦••┈┈•
❝ ♥️शब्द मनाचे♥️ ❞
Join👉@shabdamanache
•┈┈••✦✿✦•♥️•✦✿✦••┈┈•
🌅 " आजचे सुविचार "
1) प्रत्येकाच्या सुखाच्या आणि आनंदाच्या कल्पना वेगवेगळ्या असतात, आपला आनंद कोण कशात मोजतो हा ज्याचा त्याचा प्रश्न आहे.
2) दुःखाची नाणी हातात पडूनही जो सुखाचा व्यापार करतो, त्यालाच तर जीवन जगणं असं म्हणतात.
3) विचारांचं नातं इतकं घट्ट असावं की मतभेद सुद्धा हसत हसत स्वीकारता आले पाहिजेत.
•┈┈••✦✿✦•♥️•✦✿✦••┈┈•
❝ ♥️शब्द मनाचे♥️ ❞
Join👉@shabdamanache
•┈┈••✦✿✦•♥️•✦✿✦••┈┈•
❤6
Signed कैलास शोभा रामराव बोबडे
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @shabdamanache. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
⛳️🪁घे भरारी तू🪁⛳️ @ghebhararitu · 18,752 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 October 2026
धडपडणाऱ्या_तरुणाईसाठी.... @Dhadpadnarya_Tarunaisathi · 29,567 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
Pune Rooms @pune_rooms_rental · 76,806 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
MANISH MANKAR @manishmankaryoutuber92 · 39,695 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Pune Rooms @Punerooms · 19,396 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 September 2026
Aims Study Center (स्पर्धा मंच) @aimsstudycenter · 36,846 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 31 August 2026
🚨ANUBHAV STUDY OFFICIAL 🎯 @ANUBHAVSTUDYOFFICIALNDSS · 21,483 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 September 2026
🏘 Pune Rooms 🏘 @pune_rooms_flats_pg · 74,179 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
🚨🚔 पोलीस भरती सराव प्रश्नपत्रिका कट्टा 2026-27 🚔 🚨 @policebharatisaravpaper2026_27 · 41,399 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
🚨 वनरक्षक भरती 2026 🚨 @Vanrakshak_Academy · 29,465 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Vitthal Kangane @vitthalkangane · 171,757 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
👮™श्री अकॅडमी पोलीस भरती सोलापूर ™👮♂️ @POLICEBHARTI1070 · 18,944 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 October 2026
Abhyas Mitra Official @AbhyaasMitra · 26,505 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 September 2026
🚨OFFICER'S KATTA🚨 @Officer_Katta · 62,696 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
🚨 महाराष्ट्र पोलीस भरती 🚨 @maharashtra_policebharti · 77,720 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
Marathi Corner @marathicorner · 97,860 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
🚨𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐇𝐮𝐛 ®🚨 @achievers_hubb · 20,226 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
⭕️ नाद वर्दीचा ⭕️ @nad_vardicha1 · 92,775 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
🏆 मराठी GK ™ 🏆 @chalughadamodi2024 · 89,760 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
चालू घडामोडी + GK (Official) @ChaluGhadamodiMPSC · 149,563 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
शालेय विज्ञान : by Gvs @Shaley_Vidnyan · 72,943 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️शब्द मनाचे❤️” (@shabdamanache), 5,893 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shabdamanache.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
